Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: richard kent gates; troll

Posted 12 years ago on Nov. 27, 2011, 1:55 a.m. EST by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

richardkentgates said 12 minutes ago at Nov. 27, 2011, 1:42 a.m. EST (delete)

"i came on this forum doing my own thing. i have participated in many levels. it was your decision to fk with me. now you get mad because i didn't tuck my tail and run home? thats life bud. i'm the least of your worries. you think the rest of america is going to just let some canadian anarchists insight violence in our country and nothing happen?"

richardkentgates (Fort Walton Beach, FL) 1 points 0 minutes ago

"freeloading leach" oh, thats the insult of a republican one percenter zombot allright, we have us a real live one.

hes here to try to sell us on his happy little blog zone; but hes a troll; and hes the leach, and every major attack hes made against me is probably more accidental confession about what hes really up to.

this troll serpent wants you all to come join his little site, and get a blog. so he can shuffle you into a closet and shut you up and push you around.

SEE it. Catch it. Now ya'all go WARN his victims to get out of there.

The real question after that is, is occupy news just caught in the cross fire? or is this the buddy system, two con scam artists with blog sites trying to subvert and game the whole thing stupid?

richards a full positve red flag con scam head gamer abusive manipulator looking for cheap meat. Occupy news is aschroedingers troll. Occupy. news, lets see you reveal your hand.

Ever read any game theory? the chapters on reality testing are particularly interesting.

List of Threads on OccupyWallStreet.org

http://occupywallst.org/forum/organizational-map-2/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/dangers-of-unmoderated-forums/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/purple-dialogue/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/enough-jabbing-at-wall-street-lets-go-for-the-knoc/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/its-time-the-occupy-movement-as-a-whole-become-a-m/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/corporate-oligarchy/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/thetruth-socialismcapitalismcommunismmarxism/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/capitalism-versus-corporatism/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/no-war/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/help-me-understand/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/capitalism-a-love-story/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/sociology/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/energy-101-solution/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/ethics/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/systems-theory-primer/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/organize-inform-take-action-effect-change/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/better-website-needed/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/stop-playing-the-devils-games/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/nonviolence-the-only-path/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/ows-not-against-capitalism/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/this-is-not-about-political-stripe-it-is-about-bas/

72 Comments

72 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 5 points by OccupyNews (1220) 12 years ago

gawd of truth, I consider you the troll here. I don't know all the trolls but I think you merit a spot near the top of the list.

[-] 2 points by CrossingtheDivided (357) from Santa Ysabel, CA 12 years ago

What's your evidence? I don't see your point. Although I disagree with the practice of making personal-attack threads. That lacks class, among other things.

[-] 1 points by OccupyNews (1220) 12 years ago

Thanks for asking. first off, there is NO transparency on Gawd of Truth's profile page, it is empty. So to accuse another of being a troll when they themselves have left no info on their profile page is the first sign.

Second, rather than simply starting their own topics, I have experienced Gawdoftruth attack a thread that I started and what I do rather than simply start their own thread and promote what they believe in.

http://occupywallst.org/forum/occupynewsnet-thanksgiving-request/

[Deleted]

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

lol. this is awesome. first, i have more transparency than most people here by a wide margin since i link back through the wiki which i constantly promote to Facebook, and hence my real name and ETC. Secondly, you have nothing here, because i don't have beliefs, i have knowledge, and third, i am the one who was attacked in each instance first after just trying to make a point of information.

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by thrasymaqwe (13) 12 years ago

here Richard makes sense- ows needs people like Richard - his site supports the spirit of ows- and is fighting injustice side by side with ows- i for one welcome richard in our mutual battle against this injust system.

[-] 1 points by ScrewyL (809) 12 years ago

Likewise. Even tho I like Glaucon a lot more than Thras, i would have to agree on this point.

On the other hand, I often see gawdoftruth make personal attacks and constantly claiming "TROLL! TROLL!" on this person or another.

It gets real old, and accomplishes nothing. I think he fancies himself a defender of the movement and what he percieves is its political leanings, but this would go contrary to the leaderless, non-political structure of OWS.

Rather than promoting defense, I more often notice him maintaining control -- which was never his anyhow.

What these OWS gatekeepers are going to ultimately have to accept, is that true "Consensus" can never come from censoring or belittling perspectives.

[-] 1 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

Screwy, you're talking to a poser - thrasymaqWe, not Thrasymaque. He keeps setting up user names and changing 1 letter which is difficult to catch unless you know what you are looking for.

[-] 1 points by ScrewyL (809) 12 years ago

Damnit, you're right. I caught him at this game once, but he got me this time. Thanks. Dinner later? XD

[-] 1 points by April (3196) 12 years ago

Dinner AND drinks. Your place or mine? : )

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

oh, watch the troll spin. no, the issue is with the primitivity of the kind of software, but your defensiveness tipped me off to the scent of con scam and i then we hound dogged you out. me? play the victim? no, i play sleuth. you are caught. you are self promoting here and in truth trying to do what you now try to argue i am doing; centralize a blog space and then shaft the movement and laugh it all up as you con scam dupes from the movement.

And now you want to shift blame back to me? your caught. slither back under a rock troll .

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

thats me, sniffing down a troll, and thats you, proving i was right about your con scam.

Whos been the dick all along? i just went off once i smelled a serpent.

i see right through you.

[-] 3 points by OccupyNews (1220) 12 years ago

Gawdoftrite, you don't seem to get that rather than just start your own threads and make points YOU believe in, you instead go around hassling other people.

You're the one that started this thread attacking another rather than simply making a point about what YOU believe in.

Unless what you believe in is, attacking others?

[-] -2 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

i stand up to liars and con artists, which is what you apparently are. Its not what i believe in since i don't have beliefs. I shared simple factual information about blogs being a primitive medium and you took that personally, turns out that you and kent have something to hide; your in this because you ar ehere to subvert the movement and suck in dupes to your con scam; And My job is to reveal the truth.

[-] 1 points by OccupyNews (1220) 12 years ago

You want to meet in person? We're only about 50 miles apart.

Call me a con artist to my face and we'll see what happens.

On a more communicative note, Why the f are you so frickin fixated on bloggers? Leave them alone if you don't like them.

sheesh.

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

gee, let me think about that. uhm. meet a liar AND a con artist in person, and then play games with them trying to intimidate me that way? i have more important things to do with my time...

and you aren't intimidating me.

I'm not fixated on bloggers. Its become clear that you people aren't just bloggers.

You are con artists, offering services to people inside of the movement while in fact Actively working against the movement- so anybody who trusts you with their time and energy is going to get shafted.

[-] 1 points by OccupyNews (1220) 12 years ago

I called you a dirtbag but that would just be an insult to the dirt and the bag.

[Deleted]

[-] 2 points by nucleus (3291) 12 years ago

Now that's funny, coming from the guy who trolls here for people to write for free for his for-profit website.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

oh. thats awesome, i'm loving this, the freaks all come out at once. lol.

[-] 2 points by looselyhuman (3117) 12 years ago

Dude, delete this divisive crap, please?

[-] -1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

sorry, no, i'm warning the public about a con scam troll. I take that responsibility seriously, and its not just being divisive given that the agenda of the person has been revealed. We need to be aware, this is how they will do it. Subvert, co-opt, invite us over to their con scam sites which they will control and probably eventually delete... People will spend all their time and energy only to have scum bags like this destroy it all.

[-] 1 points by ScrewyL (809) 12 years ago

Gawdoftruth, point blank: What about his agenda will hurt the OWS movement?

If you're right, I'll change my tune. Here and now.

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

if hes AGAINST the occupy movement, then you have to ask YOURSELF what his AGENDA is? Since i don't KNOW what his agenda is, other than the fact that hes AGAINST the movement, I can only guess that hes got his plans to marginalize those who fall into his web.

I think that is self evident; read what he SAID. He is the one who said what he said' READ THE ORIGINAL POST to this thread, WTF?

How am i supposed to know what his agenda is? I'm just PAYING ATTENTION... not psychic.

[-] 1 points by ScrewyL (809) 12 years ago

You're just casting vague aspersions here, not telling me specifically why I should fear that Richard will ruin everything.

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

Because he has proven time and time again that hes AGAINST the movement.

Maybe you don't remember his first few days here of outright trolling. I do.

WTF? his words as quoted say it all. Theres nothing left to discuss. Richard is a troll who hates this movement, anybody who trusts him or his site is asking to be con scammed and fucked sideways.

"i came on this forum doing my own thing. i have participated in many levels. it was your decision to fk with me. now you get mad because i didn't tuck my tail and run home? thats life bud. i'm the least of your worries. you think the rest of america is going to just let some canadian anarchists insight violence in our country and nothing happen?" richard kent gates- con scammer and troll.

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

thats not what your WORDS as QUOTED actually say.

Also, you were trolling this site ten different ways before you began this con scam facade. What, you think we will just forget?

Should i find the time maybe i will pull up some OLD threads and show WHO YOU REALLY ARE ON THOSE.

Scum sucking troll.

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

or what? now troll is trying to threaten me?

i will post ANY version of your name i happen to find.

thanks for your help in keeping this thread floated to the top, con scammer trollboy.

[-] 2 points by RichardGayTits (293) 12 years ago

Really, who gives a fuck about the freak. He has no life he lives here 24/7.

He really is just looking for some human interaction. The porn is no longer doing it for him.

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

hey? moderators? when are you going to get to this?

Richardkentgates troll file

Richard Kent Gates is a noxious, evil troll, who spent his first few weeks at the occupywallstreet.org site as a potty mouthed troll.

He then changed his game and opened a blog service, which exists for the express purpose of isolating and thus silencing occupy activists.

He is almost certainly the same person who has taken the liberty of creating new accounts using a "G" capital G instead of a little g as "Gawdoftruth" to impersonate me and has also used my real legal name in order to create an account to stalk, lie, harass, libel, slander, and stalk me.

http://ows.superunion.org/results/?q=richardkentgates

perusal of his name in the search shows that he has deleted almost all of his early interactions in order to hide his true agenda.

http://occupywallst.org/forum/richard-kent-gates-troll/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/why-are-you-attacking-and-discrediting-instead-of-/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/the-trolls-on-here-are-not-republicans-nor-are-the/

a link to all of his posts according to other user...?

http://ows.superunion.org/results/?q=citicommons

http://occupywallst.org/forum/free-the-99-banner-creator-for-websites-to-show-th/#comment-501014

[-] 1 points by OccupyNot (23) 12 years ago

Get a life loser.

[-] 1 points by JesseHeffran (3903) 12 years ago

wow, do you know that me coming here, facebook, and other sites gives me the content to write on his blogg. i believe that dichotomy of the blog verse the wiki, bs could be the biggest cause of faction reformation. I believe that if any person takes issue with the words and methods of another, they are falling into the same trap the one percent snared on themselves. now, id admit i'm not as savvy as i should be on game theory, but i believe that what i lack in that i make up for in other places.

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

pay attention to what hes said. He is the wone who said adbusters was inciting violence, and who revealed that hes against he occupy movement. Hes been a troll since this whole site began. If you are using his services, hes duped you.

"you think the rest of america is going to just let some canadian anarchists insight violence in our country and nothing happen?" richardkent gates, con scammer troll.

[-] 1 points by JesseHeffran (3903) 12 years ago

If he really believes that just because this format was devised by a foreigner, that that entails conquest of his nation, then i could see him coming to the conclusion that you may not have our best interests at heart. that is a rational conclusion that should be pondered. but asking and bull shitting here, i believe, is not the same as making youtube videos and blogging. the wiki is the public space the rest of the internet is the market place.

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

i'm lost. i don't understand what the software being designed in some country has anything to do with anything. The issue here is that both occupynews and kent gates are actually against the movement, and are inviting people to participate in a manner that is caging and organization defeating. They have ulterior motives and an agenda that is against the movement.

[-] 1 points by JesseHeffran (3903) 12 years ago

i don't know what you may think the movement is, but I don't believe you have the authority to single handedly define what a leaderless movement is all about. that would tell me you have an unaltering view of the movement and that... well, you can imagine where my head is going.

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

i haven't tried to define what a leaderless movement is about. I have identified a con scam troll, who is patently against the movement, who has duped people including you, into trusting him with your time and energy on his blog system.

[-] 1 points by JesseHeffran (3903) 12 years ago

but i use Gates' format to get my ideas out there. this format is just for fun, in my opinion. Have you read his blogs? would you like me to read your blog? his makes points i believe in.

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

you are missing the point. what you use them for is one thing. what his agenda is is something else. making true points you agree with does not change the underlying fact that hes duped you and is against the movement. I am all for you getting your ideas out there. You get to decide. Hand those ideas to entrust to people who are for the movement and who agree with you; or hand those ideas to people who are fundamentally providing that service in order to control and isolate and confuse you.

Why would i read his blogs? After what hes revealed, theres no point in doing that.

I don't have a blog, i have a wiki.

This all started as i tried to explain the systemic differences between wikis and blogs. They revealed a lot more than just stupidity over the pros and cons of different mediums- they revealed that they are AGAINST THE OCCUPY MOVEMENT.

So? are you going to continue to trust them? PAY ATTENTION TO WHAT HE SAID TO ME IN PM. HES OUT TO "GET" the "ANARCHISTS". Hes USING YOU to GET REVENGE on THEM and YOU.

Don't be a dupe and a pwn. Wake up and smell the demon whose got you sucked into his con scam.

[-] 1 points by JesseHeffran (3903) 12 years ago

you are making my head hurt. a blog is a market place. you buy it if you want; i choose not to buy some. but to say one format is an evil con and the other is the light, i believe you have a twisted view of reality. no?

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

a blog is a control system for one person to emit, not a collaboration system, like a wiki, i never said that a blog is evil, just that it has systemic limitations. THIS is a different issue than the new core issue which is that THESE blogs in PARTICULAR are being supplied by somebody who IS AGAINST THE MOVEMENT.

You being dense about it does not mean i have a twisted view of reality.

[-] 1 points by JesseHeffran (3903) 12 years ago

but if you have not read my ideas how do you know you want to collaborate with me?

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

thats irrelevant. The core issue is you are being duped by a con scammer.

People who are into collaboration understand that the best way to go is collaborate with everyone as much as possible. Assuming you are sincere and for the movement, its obvious i am al lfor collaborating. Assuming you are a sock puppet of richard, which is looking more and more likely, or a member of his troll unit, which is another strong possibility, i can understand why you'd be spinning around in such circles.

[-] 1 points by Rico (3027) 12 years ago

If YOU gawdoftruth were truly transparent, a WHOIS search of your OCCUPYTHISWIKI.ORG would show your true identity rather than "Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc."

By the way, why on EARTH are you promoting Kohl's (the store) on your wiki ?

[-] -1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

i don't promote kohls. i don't even know about the option you are trying to spin regarding, whats the "whois"? i am quite a bit more transparent than almost anybody around here, having linked through to FB.

i have removed a lot of spam from my site if i somehow missed something, then where?

[-] 10 points by Rico (3027) 12 years ago

WHOIS is the standard Internet tool for determining who is operating a given site. As for Kohl's, you should probably read your own site.

No matter, your responses to my other comments illuminate your perspective quite fully; nobody can trust any source other than those you provide, and your only sources have been widely discredited.

Please stop peddling your hatred here. That's not what OWS is about.

[-] -3 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

right, more trolls trying to tell people who they can trust. This place is so full of fucking trolls its hilarious.

I'm not peddling hatred, i'm peddling truth. You are peddling nonsense, and lying about me and spinning about me to do that.

[-] 4 points by Edgewaters (912) 12 years ago

Anyone who says they are "peddling truth" is an ideologue and a fanatic.

[-] 1 points by TLydon007 (1278) 12 years ago

Rico's actually one of the most trusted users on this forum.

You'd probably be much better off addressing what he says than throwing a fit in response to his criticisms.

Also, WHOIS is definitely not nonsense. It gives unchangeable data related to who registered a website. It was used to discredit the Rick Santelli rant about registering chicagoteaparty.com that was already registered 4 months prior.

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

i don't know how to change or involve myself in the whois etc. It most definitely is nonsense to say that my action or inaction relevant to that has anything to do with anything. I have been here since day one, so don't tell me whos "most trusted."

There isn't one whit of substance to what he says, and hes attacking me after i am providing a rational service to the public in pointing out that there are con scam trolls trying to round everyone up into blogs so they can control the communication output of the movement.

http://occupythiswiki.org/wiki/THE_99%25_POLITICAL_PARTY

http://occupythiswiki.org/wiki/Main_Page

http://www.followthemoney.org/?gclid=CMbY87bB-qsCFUPt7Qod9HE8mQ

http://maplight.org/us-congress/guide/data/money?9gtype=search&9gkw=list%20of%20campaign%20donations&9gad=6213192521.1&9gag=1786513361&gclid=CP61oYbB-qsCFQFZ7AodcTF0jw

http://www.opensecrets.org/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/our-new-wiki/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/non-violence-evolution-by-paradigm-shift/

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

you can't even spell "incite", you ignorant game playing head fucker con artist.

yeah, i think the rest of America is going to let Canadian Anarchists INCITE LOVE AND TRUTH AND PEACE.

Your ad hom attack against the movement demonstrates your true agenda and true intentions. yet you have the trollish gall to try to confuse the issue after being caught red handed. what? you think i wouldn't just post the little jibe you thought you were needling me with?

i smelled a slime ball, i pushed back, and sure enough. your a con scam prig, here to sell services explicitly designed to shuffle your victims into a closet and snuff out their useful communication opportunities.

[-] 1 points by CrossingtheDivided (357) from Santa Ysabel, CA 12 years ago

Just ignore'em, that's what I've decided to do at last (as I've come to my senses and grown tired of the dumb little games they play.)

And you might like to try not to abuse the function of this hallowed (albeit troll-infested) website by starting threads to settle personal scores. You've made your little point though, I believe you. He's mainly looking for attention. So starve the creep already!

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

somebody has to stand up to them. Its a sick job. I have knee high combat shit kickers.

[-] 0 points by ChristopherABrownART5 (46) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

The levels of sincerity are the real test, gawdoftruth, someone I know personally, IS sincere, check the profile of ChristopherABrown if that is important. Note there are sites and video I've produced linked there. gawdoftruth does have a wiki developed with considerable adequacy which with some time and exercise may find some quality uses. It is a gift and real.

Most importantly is the unconditional support that gawdoftruth has shown here on OWS forum for an article 5 convention that defines the sincerity.

Aside from that, Mr. Gates seems to have started the mudslinging here and if he is a Canadian, then the ONLY approval I'll show for him here is that he support Americans in their defense of the "law of the land". I won't say he does not, but he does not focus on defense of the law of the land and appears to be shopping for writers to fill a site of some kind.

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

thanks chris, for your support.

[-] 0 points by ChristopherABrownART5 (46) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

Hey, you recognize with full cognition that article 5 is the only possible way to gain the needed authority. I have unconditional support for the constitution and value your level of information which impels you to realize the NEED for article 5.

I know gates cannot handle the truth and plays a social game of mediocrity in politics, responding to unreasonable social fears, which to me is far more complicated than lying:) -

Neither of you are trolls per se. Differences yes. Would have been nice if gates had not tried to gain judgement here rather than focusing on functional solution of the common need politically.

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

you seem to be missing the point that gates is against the occupy movement period, to start with. Hes definitely actually a con scamming troll, and the public needs to be warned not to trust him or use his so called "services."

[-] 0 points by ChristopherABrownART5 (46) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

Hmm, now . . I wasn't real clear on reading his site exactly what it was he was advocating other than advocating, but I know you know the complexities well enough to nail down specifics if he was advocating against OWS. He just posted, but didn't say what's important, just said "read the site."

For the record, OWS hasn't come out in support of Article 5 so it is the people here at this forum that are sincere I really support. Many of them do outright support an article 5 convention as a DEMAND. It's good OWS has made the forum available and the protestors have brought attention to it and lots of sincere people have gathered online.

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

right, article 5 convention is crucial and still not quite on the tip of everyones toungue. Ending the fed can probably only be done via such a convention, so you'd think the end the fed guys would get on board with that, maybe thats the place to focus- if they want to end the fed an article 5 convention is the currently legal apparatus of state by which to do that- and etc.

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

List of Threads on OccupyWallStreet.org

http://occupywallst.org/forum/organizational-map-2/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/dangers-of-unmoderated-forums/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/purple-dialogue/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/enough-jabbing-at-wall-street-lets-go-for-the-knoc/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/its-time-the-occupy-movement-as-a-whole-become-a-m/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/corporate-oligarchy/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/thetruth-socialismcapitalismcommunismmarxism/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/capitalism-versus-corporatism/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/no-war/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/help-me-understand/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/capitalism-a-love-story/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/sociology/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/energy-101-solution/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/ethics/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/break-your-left-right-conditioning/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/nader-kucinich-and-paul/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/5-facts-you-should-know-about-the-wealthiest-one-p/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/i-am-homeless-joe-jp-morgan-chase-accidentally-for/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/can-we-end-the-fed/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/why-end-the-federal-reserve-and-what-do-you-replac/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/where-are-we-and-how-do-we-move-forward/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/things-wall-st-did-were-not-illegal/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/teaching-the-occupation/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/this-forum-needs-structure/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/ows-is-not-your-personal-billboard-for-your-politi/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/systems-theory-primer/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/organize-inform-take-action-effect-change/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/better-website-needed/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/stop-playing-the-devils-games/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/nonviolence-the-only-path/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/ows-not-against-capitalism/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/this-is-not-about-political-stripe-it-is-about-bas/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/national-initiative-for-democracy/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/a-third-political-party-the-movement-of-the-middle/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/300-fema-camps/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/ows-is-a-false-flag-operation/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/why-this-will-not-work/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/paradigm-shift-now/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/a-proposal-for-focus/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/stop-the-bullshit-posts-and-get-organized/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/suggested-goals/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/oct-18-gao/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/naomi-klein-climate-change-fight-is-down-to-the-99/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/only-1-demand-includes-all-others-article-v-of-the/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/occupy-eco-villages/

[-] 0 points by OccupyNews (1220) 12 years ago

gawd of truth, it's somewhat ridiculous to accuse others of being a troll when you have left no info about yourself on your own profile page.

[-] 2 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

right, like i haven't on the other hand linked back both to FB and My wiki. lol.

[-] 1 points by OccupyNews (1220) 12 years ago

At least mention that you just did it since when I checked last night it was empty.

[Deleted]

[-] 2 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

lol, that only proves i'm right and your being dense.

further more, i think it warrants now the point that richard here is AGAINST the movement and is looking to give you blog space over it... nothing fishy about that? lol. you have the GALL to keep attacking me when you are caught red handed. trolling me thinking you can pm me with petty little jibes on the one hand, and trying to promote yourself in order to shaft anybody stupid enough to use your services on the other hand. Oh, i think its time to give you a foot note, to your happy little troll trap site.

[-] 1 points by OccupyNews (1220) 12 years ago

gawdoftruth

You have already done so many annoying and trollish things that I'll do a recap and then hopefully attempt to avoid you and your wikiholism in the future.

Came onto a thread I started about Occupynews.net and began insulting the contents of OccupyNews WITHOUT EVER HAVING VISITED the site. http://occupywallst.org/forum/occupynewsnet-thanksgiving-request/

As if that were not enough, GOT attempted to steal the thread that I started by talking about how superior wikipediaholicism is to all other forms of computer communication. Then GawdofTruth became enraged when I gave back that which he had already dished out.

Then I discover ANOTHER thread, this thread, where GOT is insulting ANOTHER forum poster by name.

I've offered good advice, to you, I'll offer it again, just post a topic about what YOU LIKE, and try to avoid flaming what other people like.

[Deleted]

[-] 0 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

thats me on those threads. standing up to you and others, sniffing down a scent of something just not right, and in the end, you prove i am right.

The end. lol. You can't twist this to be about me con scammer.

[-] 0 points by CrossingtheDivided (357) from Santa Ysabel, CA 12 years ago

Maybe he/she is like me and had no idea there was a profile page (didn't have time to figure that out.)

Thanks for mentioning it's existence, so when I have time I can fill it out.

Of course, while this will not prove I'm not a troll, it will show I have the time to fill out a meaningless form.

[-] 1 points by OccupyNews (1220) 12 years ago

Let me add that you don't have to fill out a form, any form, to be a contributor to these forums. But lets look at the title of this topic once more, then see that the person who started the topic also has nothing listed on their profile page, that's my point.

[-] 1 points by OccupyNews (1220) 12 years ago

It will also show your history. Trolls tend to not have histories of note because they are busy, trolling.

[-] 1 points by CrossingtheDivided (357) from Santa Ysabel, CA 12 years ago

I'm 100% positive richardkentgates is a troll. That's all I'm certain of at the moment.

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by CrossingtheDivided (357) from Santa Ysabel, CA 12 years ago

Oh, I see, you're one of those who think everything is about you.

Well, I wasn't thinking about you when I wrote it.

Now go be nasty to someone else for no good reason.

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by CrossingtheDivided (357) from Santa Ysabel, CA 12 years ago

Don't PM me again, please; I don't have time for your paranoid accusations, let alone time to invent alternate personas.

I really wish this site didn't Notify me of every little missive when I cruse in. You see, some of us work, aren't here all day and night. So stop wasting my time.

Now, I've asked you nicely, drop the attitude, I did nothing to you, and I certainly wasn't sticking up for your accuser (gawdoftruth.)

Think it over. Take a deep breath. Get a life.

[-] -1 points by stuartchase (861) 12 years ago

Here's the Revolution's new song!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VL4ei-RE3Nc

http://occupywallst.org/forum/something-to-think-about-part-2-again/

Brothers and sisters, the KTC needs to lean on you!

The Revolution starts here!