Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: [DELETED]

Posted 11 years ago on Dec. 11, 2011, 12:46 p.m. EST by anonymous ()
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

[DELETED]

70 Comments

70 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 8 points by RichardGayTits (293) 11 years ago

Richard Gates, The king of trolls and multiple screen names wants us to be mature.

You have dropped this on me from three different names. Are you saying we should be more like you and post things like this when we lose a debate?

“Old hippie fuck I need your help. Need help making a t-shirt. We need to draw a picture of Zooccotti Park with a cage around it. Here are some ideas: Draw a hippie climbing the cage like a monkey and throwing shit. Draw a hippie rolling in mud and shit like a pig. Draw a hippies fucking like dogs. Draw a picture of a hippie eating peanuts like a big fucking elephant. Draw a hippie as a lazy fucking Ape doing nothing.”

Here is your counter argument. Your juvenile behavior an antics with your screen names Thrasymaque, Glaucon, puff6269, an others do nothing but reveal you as an imposter who is doing his best to sabotage anything but negative dialogue on this site.

[Deleted]

[-] 3 points by RichardGayTits (293) 11 years ago

What the fuck are you talking about!

Are you pretending I am John Bassist.....You really are a goofy fuck!

[Deleted]

[-] 2 points by RichardGayTits (293) 11 years ago

I do to.

So now where are we? You parnoid geek

[Deleted]

[-] 2 points by RichardGayTits (293) 11 years ago

Richard I am not stalking you. I try to avoid talking to you. But you or one of you screen names always manages to find me and start some shit.

Well at least you havent said you want to BF me yet. I am sure you will start talking about man on man sex after a couple more post.

You really do need to get that temper under control.

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 11 years ago

Seems to me you stalked him on this thread. Also, your username points to you being a stalker. It seems you're the troll around here. Richard is a spammer. He spams his link for his crappy website. However, he is not a troll like yourself. Only trolls try to pose as others and stalk them.

[-] 1 points by RichardGayTits (293) 10 years ago

Well you just have it all figured out don't you Richard. How about if you post a bunch of those pictures on your own thread. That will prove you are not Thrasymaque.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 10 years ago

I don't have to prove I am not Richard. You wouldn't care about evidence anyhow because you are just a conspiracy theorists who fantasizes with assumptions. If you cared to know the truth you would simply ask a moderator to cross-reference IPs. I already defaced a thread by Richard, but I don't post porn so don't expect that from Thrasymaque, nor Glaucon.

[-] 1 points by RichardGayTits (293) 10 years ago

My apologies Richard. I thought the pictures of gay men and penis' was porn.

Thanks for redefining porn and clearing everything up for me.

Maybe you should make a special thread and redefine porn there.

That way all the other people that are using the old definition will not think it is porn

[-] 1 points by dickheadgates (21) 10 years ago

But do ya know who I am?

[-] 0 points by RichardCuntGates (1) 10 years ago

Do you know who I am?

[-] 3 points by BlueRose (1437) 11 years ago

The trolls are useful in that they show the idiocy of the right.

[-] -1 points by Jflynn64 (337) 11 years ago

Idiocy of the right? You are the one who is espousing more control over people's lives.You want to steal people's money so to give it your own organizations. How is that fair?

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

Hey...........don't you work for an investment firm?

[-] 0 points by Jflynn64 (337) 11 years ago

No a bank.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

Are they paying you overtime?

[-] 0 points by Jflynn64 (337) 11 years ago

Unfortunately, no I don't get payed enough.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

LOL. I cannot figure out why the hell you would be up here on a Sunday night (or any night).

[-] 0 points by Jflynn64 (337) 11 years ago

ask me tomorrow.

Actually writing a proposal that included data work and I am doing both at the same time.

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 11 years ago

The lines you robotically give don't fool anyone here, Jflynn64.

[-] 0 points by Jflynn64 (337) 11 years ago

You don't want to debate, my arguments are all based on facts while yours are based on _?

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 11 years ago

Are you also tedscrat? No matter, same goes for you too. You are not ready for debate, and I'm not gonna babysit you tonight. Turn off Fox and get some sleep.

[-] -1 points by Jflynn64 (337) 11 years ago

No I don't hide behind pseudonyms. And unlike you it sounds like, I don't get my economic information from a TV news channel. I actually know my economics. So yes, maybe you should not debate me.

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 11 years ago

NEWS FLASH for you. "Trickle down economics" was designed by and for the 1%, and has been an utter failure at the expense of the middle class and the country.

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 11 years ago

I know my economics. I Dare you to throw some Austrian School BS my way. It is NOT accepted economics, got it?

[-] -1 points by Jflynn64 (337) 11 years ago

Resorting to profanity again. Yeah, you know your economics. So why don't we just tax at 100% then and regulate everything?

And who says what is accepted and not accepted, the Noble prize committee?

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 11 years ago

Trickle down was accepted by the United States of America. It was still an UTTER FAILURE.

[-] -1 points by Jflynn64 (337) 11 years ago

Because GDP growth was high and unemployment low? If that's failure...

[-] -1 points by Jflynn64 (337) 11 years ago

Still can't answer the question?

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 11 years ago

You have been brainwashed by the 1%. We need MORE regulation over corporations that trample workers and the environment, not less. Steal money? Is that what you call paying taxes? You just want to troll, you have to know you make the right look idiotic and clueless with your "no regulation and no taxes" position. As soon as you lose the attitude, I may try to talk sense into you. Right now you need to get off Fox and learn real news, not simply how to parrot 1%er lines about tyranny and freedom that are the exact opposite for the 99%. Get off this site and do some nonpartisan truth-searching.

[-] -1 points by Jflynn64 (337) 11 years ago

If taxes and regulation work as you suspect, why not tax everybody at 100% and have complete regulation.

Where has it worked? You expect the government to make allocation decisions. They made a good one with Solyndra.

Tell me where your idea has worked, where is the proof of it?

[Deleted]

[-] 3 points by BlueRose (1437) 11 years ago

I do. Richard, I know you want to co-opt OWS for the right, you are not fooling anyone. The right IS welcome to come to OWS and stop supporting the 1%, but you do, as fact, claim to be OWS and then BOOM! next sentence you are advocating policy that benefits the1%!

[-] 3 points by RichardGayTits (293) 11 years ago

You hit the nail on the head.

[+] -4 points by tedscrat (-96) 11 years ago

If OWS is promoting revolution, be prepared to face those you call trolls as well as anyone else who does not agree with your view. You need to withstand any and all attacks if you want to have any legitimacy at all. All the more so here, because some of your beliefs, if followed through in accordance with public policy, will completely turn the US on its head. I am on the right, if you want a category to put me in, While I wish you as individuals luck in your personal endeavors, I wish your movement as a whole nothing but failure.
That is only my opinion and should not have an impact on your movement :) However you should be fully prepared to have your balls nailed to the wall and come through stronger than before, if you are going to have any chance on the national scene.

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 11 years ago

Thank you for demonstrating exactly my point.

[-] 0 points by tedscrat (-96) 11 years ago

I am sorry, but what is your point? I am not trying to co-opt OWS for the right. While I associate myself with the right, I have productively debated with several of you in the past and hope to do so in the future.
I will spare nothing to debate you and expect none in return. But I do not believe in the categorization of people who slam your views or try to derail your beliefs as trolls. The stakes are high and the debate will be heated, but I believe we can do it calmly and in the end work together as a nation.
In the meantime, leave the terms of troll and 1% vs 99% at the door.

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 11 years ago

Debate? This is not debate, this is babysitting. I'm done here. Turn off Fox and learn something instead of trying to sound intellectual. I actually feel embarassed for you. You are not ready for debate.

[-] -1 points by tedscrat (-96) 11 years ago

Oh, Brandon Jacobs scored a touchdown! Shit, I want to see Dallas win! Good for my fantasy score. Do you like football, BlueRose? No? You should, it will lighten your mood.

[-] -1 points by tedscrat (-96) 11 years ago

Come on, debate me. I don't bite. Are you so afraid that you have to hide behind your rhetoric and stereotypical nonsense. This isn't a contest of who is smarter. If you really, truly believe in what you say, then try to convert me, or at least give me a point to ponder. If you stick by this attitude of yours, then your movement will fade into oblivion. Put down your signs and slogans and let's debate!

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

Well, hell........................

and you see, this is why I don't bother with making nice and "meet in the middle". :/

[-] 2 points by BofL (434) 11 years ago

You know the answer, Rick. Some of us have expended undue time untangling your hogwash. Only to find that you simply resort to foul language, ad hominem, or jibberish rants. Your "contribution" is as Thrasymaques- a subtraction distraction.

[-] 1 points by TIOUAISE (2526) 11 years ago

Completely AGREE, with you, "BofL".

BTW, is "richardkentgates" the same as the recently appeared "RichardGayTits"?

You're probably aware already that Gates won the TROLL AWARD in October as THE WORST TROLL on this forum:

http://occupywallst.org/forum/winner-troll-award-winner-is-richardgates/

[-] 2 points by RichardGayTits (293) 11 years ago

No! I am not the real Richard.

I am using his name to mock him after he used my name to trash people and make me look bad just like he did puff.

I thought is was kind of clever GayTits = Gates if you say it fast.

I don't think the real Richie likes it as much as I do............. :-)

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 11 years ago

The username you chose to attack Richard in a trollish manner is not clever. It's lame, uncreative, and attacks a minority. You shouldn't post derogative remarks towards homosexuals.

[-] 1 points by RichardGayTits (293) 10 years ago

Thank you for telling me how to behave I am just using you as a role model Richard. I think I'm about as big an asshole as you and all your cute little screen names.

Hey where is Glaucon, maybe he can post some gay porn. That seems to be quite acceptable to you.

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 10 years ago

No. Posting porn on a public forum is not acceptable to me nor Glaucon. You only think it is because your simple mind can only search for the truth using mere assumptions like lame conspiracy theorists.

[-] 1 points by RichardGayTits (293) 10 years ago

Come on Ricky/Thrasy, you know I am a Reptilian Illuminati of the 666 order. We make the conspiracies. Duh!

Oh I forgot, posting penis’ pictures (say that fast 3 times) is no longer porn, but you knew that or you wouldn’t have done it.

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 10 years ago

I didn't post those pictures, but if it makes you happy to believe I did, then that's fine. Conspiracy theorists like making assumptions. I understand it. Keep doing what makes you happy.

[-] 1 points by RichardGayTits (293) 10 years ago

Thanks but I really didn't need your permission.

An you just keep denying what many of us witnessed

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by RichardGayTits (293) 10 years ago

Ricky I am both my son, just like you are Ricky/Thrasy.

Guess what goof ball you didn't switch username and answered for Thrasymaque using your richardkentgates name.

I zoomed in real big and have a great screen capture to show everybody. Aint that a hoot!

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 10 years ago

You should report him to jart or the moderators. They usually stop posers. Thrasymkay was banned. This guys is posing as you, he should be banned. In addition, his username is insulting to gays and lesbians. He's just a looser making conspiracy theorists look even worst than they already are.

[-] 1 points by RichardGayTits (293) 10 years ago

Ban me! Arent you part of the no regulation, free speech thing.

Really, what I am doing is an art form, not everybody has my talentl

Isnt that how your Thrasymaque screenname rationalizes his behavior

[-] 1 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 10 years ago

Not exactly. I don't deface posts that abide by the forum rules, and I don't pose as others. I believe in rules. They are important.

[-] 1 points by RichardGayTits (293) 10 years ago

So defacing post is OK.

Richard you do pose as others. I busted you last night when you forgot to switch screen names and answered for Thrasy.

How long are you going to keep this charade up? Do you know how many people think you are a complete idiot?

http://occupywallst.org/forum/the-people-against-ows/#comment-484967 This is you posting your retarded "Old hippie" crap as your Faux Puff

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 10 years ago

Ah yes! The mind of a conspiracy theorist is so lame that it refuses to ask the moderators for the truth. So lame that it prefers to confabulate instead of researching. You little Reptilian Overlord you! So cute.

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 10 years ago

I am not denying anything. I'm simply saying you are a conspiracy theorist with an ill mind. When you witness something, your mind instantly starts confabulating and if confuses the truth of what you witnessed and you are unable to search for the truth using the proper scientific method. What you witnessed wasn't Thrasymaque posting porn, but a user named Thrasymkay. Because you are a conspiracy theorist with an ill mind you instantly assume that was me instead of doing proper research like asking the moderators to cross-check the IPs for you. The only troll around here is you because you accuse others of stuff without any proof. You are just a lame conspiracy theorist with an illogical mind.

[-] 1 points by RichardGayTits (293) 10 years ago

Christ, Richard must you alway resort to babble and rationalizing.

Present some facts.

You just keep making up shit as though somebody is stupid enough to believe it. Most of us are brighter than you.

How do you explain the fact that richard is here now.

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 10 years ago

Why wouldn't he be? I'm not concerned about proving anything to you. Conspiracy theorists cannot be proven wrong. You guys love to swim in a sea of denial. If you cared about the truth you would stop making lame assumptions and simply ask the moderators who can check in a few minutes who is who and what is what. You refuse to do this because you prefer to confabulate.

[-] 1 points by RichardGayTits (293) 10 years ago

That what that just more babble and bullshit. No substance, just name calling

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 11 years ago

Only trolls set up kangaroo courts.

[-] 0 points by BofL (434) 11 years ago

Richardgaytits shadows RKG and slams the dog out of him-who knows really-but doesn't seem like. There's a reason RKG isn't banned-he's a founder behind the scenes of the OWS flypaper disinfo cointelop sponsored by Cass Sunstein and Phil Zelikow.

[Deleted]

[-] 0 points by TIOUAISE (2526) 11 years ago

You're delusional, "RichardGayTits"!!!

[Deleted]

[-] 0 points by TIOUAISE (2526) 11 years ago

It's spelled "psycho". If you're going to insult people, the least you can do is make sure you spell it right... :)

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by TIOUAISE (2526) 11 years ago

"peoples threads"? Another spelling error... :)

[Deleted]

[-] 0 points by TIOUAISE (2526) 11 years ago

"rally"?

"to do is or"???

No, sorry to disappoint the narcissist in you, but my crush is on the beautiful English language, which you massacre daily with impunity... :)

Good day, Mr. "RichardGayTits"!

[-] 1 points by RichardGayTits (293) 11 years ago

LOL LOL you are fuckin' killin me!

Richard is such a patsy!!

"Correct me if I am wrong" Ha Ha Ha........... that was some funny shit.

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by BofL (434) 11 years ago

We've been through this-I don't debate Kol Nidre weasels. Your website is another Talmudic sewer-a waste of time and space.

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 10 years ago

oh, man, i have to say, richardgay tits, you sure make this fun and easy.

I don't know who you are, but thanks for trolling this troll back.

Occupy the occupy exists because the "movement " can't get its act together.

it can't get its act together because con scam evil bitches like you have people wasting their time at blog sites specifically so that you can isolate and silence your dupes.

You seem to have gotten me confused richard, with other people who know you are an evil beotch.

Richard Gay tits is not me, hes just somebody who clearly knows how to troll a troll. Which is you, richardkentgates, a guy who plays it both ways, who was here trolling the forum as a sick and demented potty mouth troll until he realized he could con scam people into coming over to his site. Then hes got a new game- trying to play and claim the moral high ground. We see right through you, richardkentgates TROLL. You are an evil person.

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 10 years ago

likewise. If i bore you so much, why are you posting threads in my honor? BTW... thanks for the advertising.

chimptard.

[-] 1 points by RockyJ (208) 11 years ago

:-)

[-] 1 points by Jflynn64 (337) 11 years ago

It would be interesting to see the impact of eliminating groups abilities to donate money to politicians. I think companies would survive but the unions and obviously the PACs would be minimized.

[Removed]

[Removed]