Forum Post: you troll
Posted 1 year ago on Nov. 14, 2011, 8:45 p.m. EST by MattLHolck
(14024)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
I post other posts here when people insult using the word you
I find this whole post and the comment thread almost completely unintelligable. I there is a point here, could you please spell it out and refrain from mystification?
10 points by PoliticalSquabbleKillsOWS (15) 15 minutes ago
How old are you, 12?
http://occupywallst.org/forum/partisan/#comment-823651
10 points by hchc (2098) from Tampa, FL 36 minutes ago
That was meant to draw attention to the fact that Walmart workers are getting screwed.
And yes, I dont shop there. I dont approve of their policies.
How do you misunderstand what 90% of the posters here post, day after day?
http://occupywallst.org/forum/a-labor-day-nod-to-labor/#comment-823619
8 points by PoliticalSquabbleKillsOWS (42) 29 minutes ago
No, you fail to understand OWS. Your style of protesting is à la moveon.org.
http://occupywallst.org/forum/partisan/#comment-823631
I'm sorry, but you fail to understand what OWS is about. You fail completely and miserably.
You should go back to moveon.org and dedicate your life to writing letters to the President.
http://occupywallst.org/forum/partisan/#comment-823620
I post other posts here when peole insult using the word you
Oh, I understand.
OIC. Come on. That's a matter of perspective. It's trivial. "You" can be used to mean a specific person or people in general. And when I said "You altered my post." I really meant MattHolck altered my post. You used one of the core principles of the occupier movement. Do whatever it takes to succeed, including lying, cheating and subverting the truth. Way to advance a ךּnƨʇ movement.
indeed
I thought about posting this as a subject since the thread ut was in was deleted
but I'd thought I'd leave that to you
anyway, these words have not been censored
well honestly I just can't help myself . . .
lol
where are you?
Best Comments Today Noemerner 2, 9 AM PST, 2012
If one person tells you that you have a tail 6 points 23 hours ago by DKAtoday (20023)
VQ - I do not know anymore who you are 6 points 23 hours ago by DKAtoday (20023)
You can not enter into a discussion and keep on 6 points 22 hours ago by DKAtoday (20023)
What party does Jean Quan belong to? Did she call 5 points 23 hours ago by GirlFriday (9445)
You are the only one here who has ever sent 5 points 23 hours ago by frovikleka (217)
You don't need to take a poll. 5 points 23 hours ago by DKAtoday (20023)
Wow, Shadz. You outdid yourself with that second link. 4 points 17 hours ago by beautifulworld (9883)
You are missing from your list.
[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (5140) 19 hours ago
[-] 1 points by jart (627) from Brooklyn, NY 6 minutes ago
Even nonviolence depends on state violence to expose the violence of the state. And what about crime? Are you against using violence to stop murderers and rapists?
http://occupywallst.org/forum/no-war/#comment-652272
↥like ↧dislike reply permalink
↥like ↧dislike reply permalink
this list is all about peoples unhappiness with me
so the American standards are being lowered to accommodate global rising standards? If that is the case, i'm down with that.
I'm not a troll!
I remember quite clearly those words: Flow like water.
Now, it's almost like a game. Game, set, match. Next...........
The faux arguments were an almost bloody brilliant touch and deserve a small round of applause.
Why limit it to insults using the word "you"?
because anything else is not a direct attack
"Fuck off!" = okay
"Fuck you" = not okay?
(you) "Fuck off!" is implied
and that is not an attack on the the character of the receipt
I don't like attacks, direct or indirect.
slizzo (-48) 1 minute ago
http://occupywallst.org/forum/list-of-top-forum-contributors/#comment-815440
TechJunkie (2499) from Miami Beach, FL 2 minutes ago
http://occupywallst.org/forum/louisiana-permits-freedom-speech/#comment-771756
TechJunkie (2499) from Miami Beach, FL 7 minutes ago
[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (9257) 5 minutes ago
I wasn't even talking to you!
Does Section 7 of the Louisiana state constitution give me the right to publish child pornography? (Pretend that I'm in Louisiana.) Or is there more to the story than that?
http://occupywallst.org/article/louisiana-permits-freedom-speech/#comment-771759
Yay, I made the high-score board!
Are you so weak that you can't respond directly? Those out-of-context quotes don't make much sense here.
writerconsidered123 (141) 5 minutes ago
I have one in particular that bugs me, you see all the hype over shingles vaccine. supposedly 1in 3 people will get shingles. when's the last time you saw anyone with shingles?
sorry this just bugs me and I know it's off topic
[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (8735) 2 minutes ago
my fiend has shingles
\
how did you know ?
[-] 1 points by Harrigan (2) 1 minute ago
wrong spelling, wrong subject, wrong forum
Harrigan (2) 0 minutes ago
are you strung out or just pulling your meaningless comments from a script?
http://occupywallst.org/forum/the-planet-wreckers-deniers-of-climate-science-are/#comment-757994
RealWorld2 (-29) 1 hour ago
Matt, work somewhere else. Your seach for every angle to preserve your sense of victimhood gets ridiculous.
http://occupywallst.org/forum/why-have-liberals-become-wed-to-government-unions/#comment-757539
[-] 1 points by occuman (9) 15 hours ago
http://occupywallst.org/forum/shortfall-in-californias-budget-swells-to-16-billi/#comment-736340
Wait, what?
I should start another thread for pointless pms
LOL at that Ghost guy. You literally made me cry from laughter by posting that.
phew
hardly any posts tonight
that worries me
It's Monday and we scared off many of the trolls. It will pick up by mid week.
I may have been too heavy handed
Tennessee ernie Ford - 16 Tons
says it all.
GhostInTheMachine
No Profile Information Private Messages
GhostInTheMachine said 11 minutes ago at May 8, 2012, 1:20 a.m. EST (delete)
Hey, Matt.
I'm the admin from the other site. This dude has been harassing us for about a month now. I keep trying to ban him, but he finds a way back onto our site. We have nothing against anyone. If you have any concerns, just pm me.
[-] 1 points by UnionsCare (0) 2 minutes ago
I have No doubt people like you think so. But you can do that all you want. Start a business and then turn it over to the employees. Just slide the keys across the table. But none of you are capable of that, so you want to do it with what someone else has already made. Creation comes first, re-distributors follow.
LOL
[-] 1 points by MikeInOhio (539) 1 minute ago
You believe that, if you like, but I refuse to accept that notion. You don't accept it either as you choose to express your opinion here. ↥like ↧dislike reply permalink
http://occupywallst.org/forum/teabaggers-embarrass-america-again/#comment-706363
9mills
Hello,
Please visit, Matthew's Presidential Campaign Website and learn about the monumental changes we are going to bring to America:
Campaign Website: www.wix.com/usa2012/campaign
Facebook: www.facebook.com/MattMills2012
I am hoping to receive the support of occupy wall street protesters. This campaign will be successful, but only with citizens standing together.
Please don't forget to sign the petition, we need 25,000 signatures by August in order to receive a very powerful famous endorsement. Then Obama's going to have some real competition!
I hope to get the support of you, your friends, and family.
Thank you, Matthew Mills Private Messages
[-] 1 points by ForrFredom (-23) 4 hours ago
http://occupywallst.org/forum/my-freedom-of-speech-is-being-denied-please-help/#comment-687466
You altered my post. This is what I actually said.
If your ideas are just and for the betterment of mankind than I hope you succeed. From what I've observed about OWS this couldn't be further from the truth. I've come to this conclusion by reading OWS literature, from videos posted by occupiers on Youtube, having interactions with occupiers and from the story you just told me. It's obvious that the core group of occupiers is increasingly willing to use whatever means necessary in order to achieve their goals. Including distorting the truth, squatting in places they aren't welcome, violating freedoms, harassing/antagonizing law enforcement officials, dramatizing events, censoring harmful evidence and being so overtaken by their need to win they will lie and cheat. This makes them exactly like the people they claim to fight against. If you don't purge your movement from these people and their ideas you will never succeed. Furthermore, the ideas of a revolution need to be concurrent with the ideas of the majority of the population. If they aren't, then the revolution isn't fighting for the people. It's only fighting for those who are active or supporting the revolution. If the motivating force behind a revolution is opposite of those of the majority of the population than you are the enemy of the majority of the population. If people want to be enslaved that's their option. If they are being enslaved without their knowledge the only just intervention is bringing the enslavement to their attention. If they still choose to be enslaved they have a right to do so. If it's someone's natural motivation to fight for the rights of people then they need to figure out what it is that people want. If in your endeavors you think your own ideas are better than those of the general populous and use those ideas as the motivation behind your efforts than you are the enemy of the people. If you expect your enemy to hear your words you should hear their's. The best solution is often a mixture of both party's ideas. That's how communities make positive, meaningful change. Lastly, it's a contradiction to say this land belongs to no one and then put up fences. OWS does this in both a figurative and literal way.
You've altered my posts.
I separated it into paragraph
one might consider saying the same thing in fewer words
I'll consider saying what I want.
indeed
you light up myyyyyyyy life.
[Removed]
[-] Thrasymaque 1 points 4 minutes ago
Wow, that was a really ugly site you linked to. Indeed yawn. ↥like ↧dislike reply permalink
http://occupywallst.org/forum/rise-up-trolls/#comment-522580
Did that hurt your feelings so much that you had to repost it here? If so, very sorry. I didn't know you were so sensitive. I guess I shouldn't always say what I think.
[Deleted]
Can you rephrase that in proper English? I have no idea what you are trying to say. "precipitating in communicating"? Are you just trying to make rhymes? It looks like a bad haiku, or some kind of doggerel.
Yea WTF is this thread and this guy, is he that "Mattlockian friend" you are always referring to; I think I have seen this clown out here from time to time.
What are you in stealth mode today?
[Deleted]
In that case, you should refrain from posting until you have clarified your thoughts. They seem confused at the moment. I can't make head or tails from them. Perhaps you need a good night's sleep?
shut up
You should consider taking your own advice you prescribe, as the prescription lithium as your doctors ordered. Perhaps then, you will be able to communicate better, and focus your thoughts.
Good day
[Removed]
[Removed]
[-] 1 points by DJnamaste (15) 0 minutes ago
http://occupywallst.org/forum/some-call-me-a-fool-for-thinking-that-supporters-o/#comment-752212
[Removed]
[-] 1 points by F350 (11) 0 minutes ago
You need to get back on your meds,paranoia and delusion are terrible things.
http://occupywallst.org/forum/the-reason-for-the-republican-war-against-women/#comment-682760
[-] 1 points by engineer4 (99) 0 minutes ago
Are you not able to write your own opinion or show some capacity of discussion. I see your comments all over these forums yet it seems that all you ever write is a few words. I am asking you to try, I am not here to ridicule but rather have some debate or discussion. Here is an easy one: how old are you?
http://occupywallst.org/article/6-ways-to-get-ready-may-1st-general-strike/#comment-675070
Marlow said 5 minutes ago at March 1, 2012, 11:50 a.m. EST (delete)
Wthe Hell are you Talking about? It's a Petition, people sign in Securely, give their names and Address, can choose to Opt out of having that published, but the names are verified thru their Emails!.. The Site ranks #1 for independent Petitions... Why dont you research before you assume all over the place?
have a nice day
any paper petition on the street requires name and address
there must be some way to review the voters that can be verified in the public eye
rayl
No Profile Information Private Messages
rayl said 8 minutes ago at Feb. 27, 2012, 4:16 a.m. EST (delete)
work for whoever you wish
what's so insulting about this comment, matt?
unnecessary private message
from a non signatured source
pardon my breach of etiquette, sir!
how could you have known ?
exactly, sir!
[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (1273) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 1 minute ago
The people on TV are not republicans, they're politicians. The republicans are the people that hope you fail because you shun them. Good work. I only hope you grow as a person to not require labels. They are for the intellectually lazy. ↥like ↧dislike permalink
http://occupywallst.org/forum/they-keep-hammering-away-at-this-issue-so-lets-add/#comment-653480
[-] 1 points by jart (627) from Brooklyn, NY 6 minutes ago
Even nonviolence depends on state violence to expose the violence of the state. And what about crime? Are you against using violence to stop murderers and rapists?
http://occupywallst.org/forum/no-war/#comment-652272
you listed the owner of this site as a troll. You are a class a fktard. I really had no clue you were this fucking stupid. Get bent chump.
must have wanted that
Wow she's a river of blood type person. Didn't see that coming.
I post stuff like this to people when they make no sense:
"One thing you can do if you have no water source at all is actually drink the fluid from a fresh elephant dung." - Bear Grylls
If there is anything to learn from this, it's that you shouldn't trust an old ranger that tells you to drink poo juice.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R25Eflr0oJ8
Well I've done it twice. Posted comments like this I mean. Not drinking poo juice twice.
Believe - Voltaire
[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (5030) 1 day ago
I was required to take both a civics class and an economic class in high school
[-] 1 points by uncensored (138) 1 hour ago
And now here you are on an OWS site as an expert! LOL
http://occupywallst.org/forum/public-schools-are-failing-horribly-what-should-we/#comment-646555
[-] 2 points by MattLHolck (5030) 1 day ago
public schools are not failing
what scale is being applied to imply failing?
it is the job of the school to teach
i can't think of a single school that doesn't teach
[-] 1 points by uncensored (138) 1 hour ago
If you can't see that today's public school grads are dumber than dirt, then you are probably one of them.
http://occupywallst.org/forum/public-schools-are-failing-horribly-what-should-we/#comment-646551
[-] -4 points by MattLHolck (4810) 3 months ago
[-] MattLHolck 1 points 51 minutes ago
yes, it just sinking to towards global standards
is there a way ti raise global standards ?
[-] gestopomillyy 1 points 12 minutes ago
no it us or them you have to choose . and you choose you on a daily basis.. you are not trying to raise the standards of the of any of your immediate neighbors and you have to use that sentiment for globalization.
http://occupywallst.org/forum/can-someone-explain-to-me-in-logical-termsno-crazy/#comment-354919
I got a private message
EconomicCrack said 4 minutes ago at Feb. 9, 2012, 1:42 p.m. EST (delete)
I can't reply to you on the thread. I have been banned specifically from anything on that thread, even tho I can still post and reply elsewhere. See, I have been targeted by the trolls for months because I provide material support to this movement. I had enough and last night I retaliated with this link on many of thrasys comments
https://docs.google.com/viewer?url=http://richardkentgates.com/docs/CLGF-msnbc.pdf&chrome=true
it's a pdf outlining a lobbying firms offer to tear down Occupy from within. I posted it on about 15 of his comments to imply he was a paid troll. I was banned for that. Now I am being banned specifically from any place I share that link. Apparently that link is rocking the boat.
what thread are you banned from ?
this one seems like bait but I'll let it pass
[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (4565) 53 minutes ago
republicans will raise taxes on the wealthy to create government programs for the general welfare of the people? ↥like ↧dislike reply edit delete permalink [-] 1 points by BannedForTruth (184) from Christiana, TN 32 minutes ago
Are you insane, do you not get the point? You are just play sides off one and other and in the process losing support. ↥like ↧dislike reply permalink
[-] 3 points by FarIeymowat (88) 24 minutes ago
He is a pretty seriously fucked up individual. His posts and comments are laden with the deepest vitriol and hatred for anyone who thinks differently than he does. Youre wasting time trying to get him to see outside his brainwashed mindset. He is a true believer, and completely jealous of anyone who is even modestly successful financially. ↥like ↧dislike reply permalink
http://occupywallst.org/forum/i-hate-lying-lefties-who-are-perpetually-wrong/#comment-628205
[-] 1 points by asauti (166) from Port Orchard, WA 8 minutes ago
I find it challenging to have an intelligent discussion with you, Matt.
If you want to be taken seriously, please write with thoughtful, complete sentences. Capitalize the beginning of a sentence and end it with some form of punctuation.
Doing this is the basis for efficient and effective communication.
For me, the goal is that my message or question will be best understood by the person it is being directed to.
And sure, "things people write" do not always have to be "serious" and "by the book". After all, we humans do like to "play games" sometimes.
However, on here? Well, I have a feeling, that "the real OWS people" aren't just playing a game - they are fighting for their lives!
http://occupywallst.org/forum/certain-topics-are-not-on-the-table-for-most-candi/#comment-620188
Another user reporting what he perceives to be the trolling of another in order to create some kind of mob attack against said other. Useless. I can read. I don't need you to tell me who you think are trolls by pulling their comments out of context. You're just wasting everybody's time.
People who create troll reporting posts should be banned from the forum. There's already enough trash here. If a user bothers you, down vote him or report him to the moderators. Let the other readers read and decide for themselves.
Absolutely pathetic. Like a baby crying to his mother for attention. "Mom! Johnny hit me!".
[-] MattLHolck 1 points 18 minutes ago
should food, shelter and health illustrate those differences ?
[-] JesseHeffran 1 points 11 minutes ago
nope. society does a great job at making those who can't afford those needed necessities you labeled feel inferior. giving the lower classes those things, would just create new stigmatic ways to guilt people into doing better.
[-] MattLHolck 1 points 5 minutes ago
lol
nope.
society does a great job at making those who can't afford those needed necessities
you labeled feel inferior.
giving the lower classes those things,
would just create new stigmatic ways to guilt people into doing better. ↥like ↧dislike reply edit delete permalink
Are you laughing at my reasoning? If so enlighten me to my faulty reasoning.
[-] MattLHolck 1 points 54 minutes ago
don't attack the police
[-] turak 1 points 10 minutes ago
right: let them attack you. You don't attack anybody. can you say 'body bag'?
[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (4793) 1 hour ago
money that isn't changing hands
money that is collecting ↥like ↧dislike reply edit delete permalink [-] 1 points by skylar (23) 25 minutes ago
are you against people saving their own money?
[-] 1 points by skylar (23) 3 minutes ago
you didn't answer saving money regarding me.i am not a 1%'r. i pay my bills and buy goods. i save to take care of any thing that will come up in the future.
http://occupywallst.org/forum/washington-to-make-mandatory-random-drug-testing-s/#comment-633789
In other words, methamphetamine & amphetamine caused Allied bomber pilots' performance to deteriorate & impaired their judgment, & dextroamphetamine may have impaired USAF pilots' judgment in the 1991 Gulf War.
None of that supports your earlier claim that soldiers in WW2 performed better on "speed" - quite the opposite, in fact.
[-] 1 points by kingscrossection (1132) 0 minutes ago
Ok there was a plethora of information and I'm not sure where you stand. Some said against but it seemed to me that more said for.
[Deleted]
lol
[-] 1 points by jalexander (0) 4 minutes ago
[-] 1 points by owsleader2038 (13) 6 hours ago
See what on youtube? From the 1930's??
Do me a fucking favor, ... read a fucking book, and quit watching youtube or TV,
http://occupywallst.org/forum/ows-rebels-have-you-ever-considered-the-very-notio/#comment-623586
it is not necessary to delete old records to make room for new records ↥like ↧dislike reply edit delete permalink [-] 1 points by DKAtoday (2068) from Coon Rapids, MN 6 minutes ago
I can't seriously believe that you mean that.
1 points by MattLHolck (4146) 10 minutes ago
it is the necessary to delete old records to make room for new records ↥like ↧dislike reply permalink ↥like ↧dislike reply permalink [-] 1 points by MattLHolck (4146) 0 minutes ago
at this point I have to wonder if my account is being messed with and my posts being messed with
let the administrators know that I only post from 2 IP accounts
and to check to see if anyone is altering my post from a different account ↥like ↧dislike reply edit delete permalink
http://occupywallst.org/forum/we-have-no-room-for-revisionist-history/#comment-610574