Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: The Democrats Need to control This

Posted 13 years ago on Oct. 10, 2011, 3:16 p.m. EST by truthhurts (33)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

We can't have the far lefties doing this. We need them to be part of the Democat family so we can control them. We Dems control the Unions and the Civil Rights people and the Gays, Lesbians. How could us Democrats possibly let this one get out from under our umbrella? You will see Dem politicians now come in from all sides to circle this up and get it under control. control. control. control.

73 Comments

73 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 4 points by GammaPoint (400) from Oakland, CA 13 years ago

You're clearly not a Democrat. But whatever, the Democrats will not control this. They are part of the problem.

[-] 1 points by Fuckoutsourcingjobs (15) 13 years ago

this is exactly right.

[-] 2 points by Ike (11) 13 years ago

Democrats and the republicans are in bed with wall st an the rich, they don't give a rats ass about the rest of us!

[-] 1 points by truthhurts (33) 13 years ago

Agree. Repubs want to control the poor to be their workers and Dems want to control them to be their voting robots.

[-] 1 points by Kman (171) 13 years ago

Stop this thinking and this back and forth arguing!

http://occupywallst.org/forum/we-cannot-become-the-lefts-version-of-the-tea-part/

[-] 1 points by pissedoffconstructionworker (602) 13 years ago

I think your talk box got stuck on repeat at the end there! Give it a whack!

[-] 1 points by oceanweed (521) 13 years ago

push congress to end bush tax cuts , rebuild America bridges and roads , invest in middle class not banking class thats the occupy wall street message

[-] 1 points by SIBob (154) from Staten Island, NY 13 years ago

The Democrats, (of which I am one), have dropped the ball long ago. The last thing we need is for the party of compromise, (with the far right agenda), to co-opt what these smart young people have accomplished. The Democrats need to get in line, and wait their turn, and maybe they can get in the good graces of this movement again, if they are lucky. I am all for starting a new party, and jettisoning all the corporate-controlled hacks of both parties. http://sibob.org/wordpress/

[-] 1 points by imrational (527) 13 years ago

instead of starting a new party, let's focus on getting run-off voting so third parties stand a chance.

[-] 1 points by SIBob (154) from Staten Island, NY 13 years ago

Okay, it's a start.

[-] 1 points by Opal (57) 13 years ago

If Dems were into control, there would be no OWS.

We aren't.

[-] 1 points by truthhurts (33) 13 years ago

They were in control for years. Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Obama had a majority and control of everything. What did they do with it?? Vacations, jets, golf.

[-] 1 points by PoliticallyIncorrectBenjamin (50) 13 years ago

The Democrats have grabbed this by the horns and are riding it off a cliff. Y'all, and I say y'all because the basis has my support, not the left faction, need to weed out these lefties.

I mean honestly, go around to the people who first got this thing going and organize a day to not show. The only people out there will be a bunch of left wing lunes and unions and they will be exposed for their efforts.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 13 years ago

so tired of the right left paradigm

[-] 1 points by WhyIsTheCouchAlwaysWet (316) from Lexington, KY 13 years ago

Hear, hear!

[-] 1 points by MadCat (160) 13 years ago

So say we all.

[-] 1 points by imrational (527) 13 years ago

damn straight

[-] 1 points by dabocx (24) from McAllen, TX 13 years ago

Both parties are bought

[-] 1 points by Haitiana4Obama (20) 13 years ago

First off you're a troll and secondly we have to start somewhere and the more culpable of the two are Conservati­ves, we can not go this on our own. Democrats have a chance to change their ways and join Progressiv­es. But we can't go blasting everyone and expect result

[-] 1 points by alwayzabull (228) 13 years ago

The term 'progressive' is used to spin away from people using the term 'liberal' which now has a negative connotation. I prefer to use the term liberal to describe the left, just suits me better.

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 13 years ago

they will try. they will fail.

they will get taken out as the trash. along with the republicans.


http://occupywallst.org/forum/thetruth-socialismcapitalismcommunismmarxism/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/capitalism-versus-corporatism/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/help-me-understand/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/capitalism-a-love-story/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/sociology/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/energy-101-solution/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/ethics/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/break-your-left-right-conditioning/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/nader-kucinich-and-paul/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/5-facts-you-should-know-about-the-wealthiest-one-p/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/i-am-homeless-joe-jp-morgan-chase-accidentally-for/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/can-we-end-the-fed/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/why-end-the-federal-reserve-and-what-do-you-replac/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/teaching-the-occupation/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/this-forum-needs-structure/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/ows-is-not-your-personal-billboard-for-your-politi/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/systems-theory-primer/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/organize-inform-take-action-effect-change/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/better-website-needed/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/stop-playing-the-devils-games/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/nonviolence-the-only-path/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/ows-not-against-capitalism/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/this-is-not-about-political-stripe-it-is-about-bas/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/national-initiative-for-democracy/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/a-third-political-party-the-movement-of-the-middle/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/300-fema-camps/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/ows-is-a-false-flag-operation/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/why-this-will-not-work/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/paradigm-shift-now/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/a-proposal-for-focus/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/stop-the-bullshit-posts-and-get-organized/

[-] 1 points by SmallBizGuy (378) from Savannah, GA 13 years ago

Take a page (or whole chapter) from the Tea Party play book. They ended up controlling the Republican party (I am not passing judgement...just an observation)

Both the Repubs and the Dems have blown it with the OWS people. Good luck with the movement.

[-] 1 points by mgiddin1 (1057) from Linthicum, MD 13 years ago

They are NOT controlling the Republicans. Quite the opposite. They were co-opted, plain and simple. I was originally part of the Tea Party until I realized that they morphed into being for Big Government, no thanks to the Koch brothers and others. When all the Tea Party newbies came in, they immediately got yanked up by the 'good ole boys' club and they dutifully voted to renew the Patriot Act. What traitors. I wish the original Tea Party were controlling the establishment, because if they were, we would have sound money from ending the private Fed, and the economy might not be collapsing in slow motion right now. And we would be pulling out of all 7 wars that we're in, because the true tea partiers wish to avoid 'foreign entanglements' and don't want us to police the whole world.

[-] 1 points by 31happyvalley (1) 13 years ago

I live in the North East of the UK, and I'v been following your valid protest with great interest. I don't know if your aware of the fact that your protest get's hardly any publicity whatsoever on UK tv, and none in any press. I have seen only 2 very short clip's on TV, one showing the arrest's on the Brooklyn bridge, and a short interview with a protestor in N.Y. I'd like to know who is responsible for all this gagging, your leaders or ours? so much for democracy. Keep up the good work, and the sooner your movement can jump the pond to here the better.

[-] 1 points by imrational (527) 13 years ago

My fingers are crossed for my friends across the pond. May Sean Hoare's death not be in vain and the corruption between the Press, your Prime Minister, and Scotland Yard yield you a bumper crop of reform.

[-] 1 points by jph (2652) 13 years ago

Ha ha ha,. you give the dems way too much credit! They control blablabla,.

Wake up! the dems are just the moderate side of the Single Party System (corporate/militarty fascism) the republicans are the batsht far right fringe of the SAME party.

[-] 1 points by kenny247 (3) from Rochester, NY 13 years ago

What are the demands of OWS? Are you wasting everybody's time??

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

FRANK DODD PELOSI REID WEINER

Theres your problem

And they support OWL? Really?

[-] 1 points by powertothepeople (1264) 13 years ago

But OWS doesn't support them. Funny how that works, right?

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

Not funny.

The majority of Americans right now believe that OWL is part of the Dem machine.

They way to change that is to march on DC call out all the politicians

This Downtown thing is a waste

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

Control, Censor, Control,

The Dems think they control!

They think they own the unions

They think they own Civil rights

They they control Gays & Lesbians

Fuck the Democrats. Fuck the left!

You control nothing!

The left isn't part of the problem they are the problem!

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

Yes blame the left for everything, declining wages, a system where peoiple are expected to do more work for more hours for the same wages, where well qualified people, including veterans who have served our country can't find a job while our large corporations are sitting on $2 trillion in cash, where jobs are outsourced to foreign countries, so that the products can be shipped back here as imports. Yup blame the left, blame anyone except those at the top who control things, because certainly the corporate leaders and the bankers who deny credit to small businesses and who get huge bonuses aren't responsible for anything, are they?

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

Wake up they are the ones that control things. They control Hollywood, Media, The White House, The Senate, Wall St, they have everything.

We are being manipulated by them constantly. Wall St gave more money to Obama than any other candidate in history.

They even try to take ownership of this movement.

We are bombarded with people like Michael Moore who would have you believe that the right wing republicans control big business. It's just the opposite.

Look at the facts! Obama just hired the CEO of GE to be his Jobs Czar!

Are you fucking kidding me?

Soros is a Republican? I don't think so. He owns Progressive insurance. A company that not only ripps off the entire country, he get to be exempt from all of his cohorts in the insurance industry that are "exempt" by the left wing congress and Senate from all US Anti-Trade laws.

The left is the problem. It amazes me how many people think hey are a liberal but when you look at the facts, and what they believe in, they should never utter the word....Liberal

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

This is what is so crazy about using labels like "left" or liberal". it's what someone does that should render them worthy of support not their supposed label. You are right, GE made all that money and I, working as a bellman paid more in ACTUAL dollars than the entire GE corporation because of some loopholes created by both parties to benefit the fat cats. Manipulation is going on by the wealthy in this country, no matter what their supposed political beliefs.

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

NO NO NO. the labels matter!

Don't get me wrong. It's not like all republicans are good I'm not saying that at all. And I'm also not saying that all democrats are wrong.

What I am saying is look at the facts! Not the BS that comes out of the media, hollywood, etc

The left controls everything.

This movement should be all about changing Washington. You change that and big biz has to follow. You can't change big biz without Washington.

We have to get rid of Govt thinking it knows more than we do. Allow the country to go back true "Free Markets".

Less regulation less govt intrusion less govt No govt purchase or loans get out of green energy let the market dictate let big biz fail when they screw up.

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

Labels can blind however. I might be considered left, but I support these values: We believe in the virtues of work, of having a meaningful career that enable us to support our families and contribute to our communities. We also have the expectation that if we work hard and live by the rules, we will have the means by which we can maintain a reasonable standard of living, and provide for a comfortable retirement and help educate our next generation.

We believe it is the obligation of businesses, employers and government to be honest with people, and to treat them with respect, dignity and fairness.

We believe that every person has the expectation that they will be allowed to benefit from the fruits of their hard work, ingenuity and investment, but that with any success, there comes the obligation to treat those responsible for that success with fairness, dignity and respect and also allow others to so benefit from their own hard work, ingenuity and investment, whether such investment is in the form of labor or capital.

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

If you believe in that you are not on the left you are on the right.

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

And yet I support this movement, because I believe that until we address the abuses that have occurred in the system, these values cannot be avhieved by the average person.

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

Follow Herman Cain. He has it right.He knows whats wrong with the Fed.

He also knows that the movement should be in Washington protesting the left.

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

I've listened to him. Changing the President will do very little when the entire system is rife with corruption where the average citizen has a better chance of winning Powerball than getting their views respected. It's not the left, we should be protesting it should be ALL of them that allow their narrow partisan power plays that have everything to do with power to override the interests of the American people. That episode with the debt ceiling was a disgrace and made a mockery of everything.

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

I disagree. Cain is a true leader unlike Obama, more akin to Reagan/Kennedy.

But you are right we have to clean out the sewer of left wing nuts in the Senate.

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

My problem is how does the current system serve these values that I also support::

We believe that it is essential that every citizen, regardless of his or her economic status, have an equal voice in the governing of their communities, states and country, and with that the unfettered right to speak out, advocate, vote, and if desired, run for public office.

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

We already have these rights. Wouldn't it be interesting to see how many of the people that are occupying voted?

On average, only about 25% of the public votes in any given election. Most people do not vote. Our system works. Its the people that are not working the system. It can all be fixed!

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

I vote in every election, and in fact at one time was a member of the state legislature.

I would hope then that you would oppose efforts by some states to impose onerous Voter ID laws that will have the effect of suppressing voters.

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

Glad to hear that vote and served.

I do not believe that ID laws for voters would suppress voters at all. I have personally witnessed problems at the pols. Whats the problem with showing ID? Proving you are who you are? I have to do it when I get on a plane. Or when I go to the bank.

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

What kind of ID is required? What is being prevented. How many actual cases of voter fraud have been discovered and prosecuted out of the millions of votes cast each year. I learned as a legislator, when you enact something, there should be an actual problem being addressed. I think the problem here is that minorities or city residents who don't need drivers licenses are voting the wrong way and it should be made harder for them to vote. In fact in one state they didn't want a military ID to be valid to vote!

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

Military ID should be valid that's crazy. I live in the suburbs and have witnessed voter fraud. I know of two cases in my state for sure. I watched a group of people, around 20 enter a polling place, without being registered to vote and demanded to vote, and were allowed into the machines. That's outrageous. They were allowed because there wasn't enough police there to control the situation. I'm laughing at your comment about having an actual problem before enacting. That's all politicians do. Enact even though there is no issue! LOL

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

OK. I guess we don't agree on that. My point was that if someone doesn't have an ID that the law demand, they are denied the right to vote. Maybe, then if they don't have that ID they should also be exempt from all taxes then.

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

The current laws require we do have some form of ID. I don't think the govt should have the right not to recognize a form of ID that in fact it distributes.

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

Actually, I don't believe the law directly requires us to have a form if ID. Yes we're supposed to get a social security card, but it says right on it "Not valid for identification." I do agree that to become employed, you are required to prove citizenship or the right to work here as part of our immigration laws.

Your last sentence certainly is reasonable. The Libertarian part of me does not like the idea of requiring identity cards, too much like the Germans in WWII asking for "papers" lol

[-] 1 points by hotdoghenry (268) 13 years ago

I think you are correct. But if I'm not mistaken if a police officer asks you for identification you are required to give it to them.

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

It depends on why you are being stopped. I think what is important is that every citizen should have the opportunity to participate. The even bigger problem is that money dominates the process. Even in Vermont, money is a factor. It's wrong whether the money to do so comes from the right or the left.We don;t have a House or a Senate anymore, we have a Millionaires' Club, and it shows in the fact that they do not serve our interests.

I also am sure that there are many people that you don;t agree with here. However a diversity of opinion is essential otherwise it begins to be a cocoon where everyone parrots each others' opinions and there is no independent thought or critical thinking. Also, that diversity of opinion will hopefully change minds and make for better decisions and positions.

[-] 1 points by kestrel (274) 13 years ago

democrats already control it... follow the green energy loan payoffs to the brookfield asset management of new york.

[-] 1 points by jjrousseau714 (59) 13 years ago

Krugman and Stiglitz know the way

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

Who wrote your copy for you? Karl Rove, or the Koch brothers?

[-] 1 points by TIOUAISE (2526) 13 years ago

RIGHT ON!!!

[-] 1 points by madfoot (52) 13 years ago

Why do liberals always namedrop Koch like it means anything? You look as crazy as when Glenn Beck rants about George Soros.

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

It's a start that you admit Glenn Beck rants. Anyway, George Soros is very open about where he puts his money, the Koch's are not, that is the difference.

[-] 2 points by FransiscoDAnconia (17) 13 years ago

HAHAHAHA, open. HAHAHA

oh geeze, that is a good one!

[-] 1 points by madfoot (52) 13 years ago

It's a start that you admit Glenn Beck rants.

...Because I wouldn't have admitted that anyway? Whatever.

Anyway, George Soros is very open about where he puts his money, the Koch's are not, that is the difference.

Bullshit.

[-] 2 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

When I look at my replies to you, I realize I was not being respectful. I apologize.I know you care about our country and want it to be a better place. I think we all do, even if we disagree on what that is. It is sometimes easy to forget that a diversity of opinion is essential otherwise it begins to be a cocoon where everyone parrots each others' opinions and there is no independent thought or critical thinking. Also, that diversity of opinion will hopefully change minds and make for better decisions and positions.

[-] 2 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

I should add that I don;t believe this movement should accept funding from either of them.

[-] 1 points by madfoot (52) 13 years ago

Hehe, no doubt, but OWS will inevitably get funding from Soros. It's simply the nature of the beast. It's not about OWS accepting funding, because most of them don't want help, but Soros funded operations like ThinkProgress have helped the movement along and will continue to for no other reason than they agree with it. :)

[-] 2 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

I remember that I subscribed to MoveOn, which was first formed as a protest to the Clinton impeachment, and the title said that we should "move on" to more important issues, instead of focusing on what Clinton did with Monica Lewinsky. I haven't been involved in it after that, once I saw it became involved in one side of the political battle in a system that isn't working for the vast majority of us.

It's natural for someone to support something they agree with it. I just don't want to see the money drive the direction of things.In the end we need to curtail the power of these shadow groups, whether left or right, that get funding from a few and don;t disclose who they are, and then purport to be grass roots organizations.

[-] 1 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

I guess if you believe that, you believe that.

[-] 1 points by madfoot (52) 13 years ago

I don't really like or hate either of them. I give them the benefit of the doubt that they're dedicated ideologues who happened to get rich and want to support causes they believe in. For the three of them, too, I'm almost positive that charitable philanthropy vastly outnumber their political donations.

By the way, I'm not sure if you knew this, but David Koch isn't necessarily your generic Republican/Tea Partier. He supports gay marriage, legalization of marijuana, and was against the Iraq War and Patriot Act. He even donated to ACLU to fight it. I think you can say similar things about Soros; each represents and supports unique, rivaling perspectives of the American left and right... but they're not evil. :p

[-] 2 points by HMSinnott (123) 13 years ago

Fair enough. I know at least one of the Koch brothers is active in the arts and one sits on several boards in NYC I believe.

I think we agree that we don't want this to become ideological, either left or right, but instead focus on solutions to get us out of this mess and allow the average Joe to make a decent living support their families and expect that their next generation can have the opportunity to do better than themselves.

[-] 1 points by WorkingClassAntiHero (352) from Manchester, NH 13 years ago

Democrats are as much a part of the problem as Republicans. Both shill and horsetrade with whatever interest groups they can to shore up electoral support, then sell them all out when it comes to legislation. What this movement needs to be about is an end to the corporate influences in government. An end to campaign financing by big ticket donors and an end to the influence that buys them. We need our legislators and office holders to be able to govern without needing to worry about placating interest groups and financiers and certainly need to stop believing one party or the other in this dog-and-pony show actually cares about the average person presently. And no Sbarak, we don't need guns and arms. Your romantic fantasies about what insurrection and rebellion should look like would only serve to discredit the movement and get people killed. This is not Libya. We're not living under an authoritarian military police state.

[-] 0 points by sbarak2001 (1) 13 years ago

come on protesters like you think your going to get what you want? you need to start with your local police departments and National Guard Stations to make them come to arms if you want any change. Other wise you are just protesting producers making movies you don't like.