Posted 1 year ago on Jan. 4, 2012, 11:26 a.m. EST by hidden
from Los Angeles, CA
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
This expression often attributed to direct democracy, but does it paint the real picture?
Do you really think, that there are more wolves then the lambs around us?
Is it another fear based manipulation?
What is the alternative? Two lambs and a wolf, where wolf in a lamb's skin is ordering one of the lamb to prepare the other? That's exactly what we have and that's what we always had.
If a lamb ever get in power, the lamb immediately gets eaten like J.F.Kennedy.
This expression also implies a choice, when in reality, there is no choice, the wolves will eat the lambs without any vote taken unless the other lambs interfere.
Please, reevaluate your expressions. Do they bring us legitimate concern or fear based manipulation.