Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: The Mass Psychology of Capitalism

Posted 12 years ago on Dec. 24, 2011, 2:52 a.m. EST by Anachronism (225)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

http://www.chartist.org.uk/articles/econsoc/sept02lee.html

The Mass Psychology of Capitalism

[...snip...] "[T]he indicators of disintegration and social pathology are everywhere. Rates of clinical depression have increased considerably since 1950. In America a survey of over 18,000 adults found that a person born between 1945 and 1955 was between three and ten times more likely to suffer a major depression before the age of 34 than a person born between 1905 and 1914. Another American study involving 19,000 people found that 20% of the total US population suffer from a mental illness (as defined by the psychiatric bible The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) during any given 12 months and that 32% will suffer at some point during their lifetime. Rates of suicide have increased since 1950 - they have trebled in the UK since 1970. Crimes against the person have risen in the UK from 6,000 in 1950, to 239,000 in 1996. Alcohol and substance misuse have increased exponentially."

http://ije.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/35/2/252

Is modern Western culture a health hazard?

Richard Eckersley National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, The Australian National University, ACT 0200, Australia. [...snip...] "The cultures of societies are underestimated determinants of their population health and well-being. This is as true of modern Western culture, including its defining qualities of materialism and individualism, as it is of other cultures. This paper draws on evidence from a range of disciplines to argue that materialism and individualism are detrimental to health and well-being through their impacts on psychosocial factors such as personal control and social support." [...snip...] "Marmot and Wilkinson,7 in noting the relationship between income inequality and social affiliation, suggest there is a culture of inequality' that is more aggressive, less connected, more violent and less trusting." [...snip...] "The psychological and sociological literatures suggest powerful effects of culture on psychological well-being. Take materialism, by which I mean attaching importance or priority to money and possessions (and so broadly equate here with consumerism), and which underpins consumption-based economies. Many psychological studies have shown that materialism is associated, not with happiness, but with dissatisfaction, depression, anxiety, anger, isolation, and alienation.13,20 Human needs for security and safety, competence and self-worth, connectedness to others, and autonomy and authenticity are relatively unsatisfied when materialistic values predominate." [...snip...] "Modern Western culture undermines, even reverses, universal values and time-tested wisdom.12,13 The result is not so much a collapse of personal morality, but a loss of moral clarity: a heightened moral ambivalence and ambiguity, a tension or dissonance between our professed values and lifestyles, and a deepening cynicism about social institutions. Without appropriate cultural reinforcement, we find it harder to do what we believe to begood'; it takes more effort. And, conversely, it becomes easier to justify or rationalize bad behaviour. There are positive (reinforcing) feedbacks in the process: anti-social values weaken personal and social ties, which, in turn, reduce the hold' of a moral code on individuals because these ties give the code itsleverage'; they are a source of `moral fibre'.

28 Comments

28 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by divineright (664) 12 years ago

Interesting read. From the studies I have read, materialism only affects happiness to the extent of basic survival. Once you are assured to afford the basics (food, shelter, etc.), more material gain does not necessarily result in greater happiness. There are many other factors at play. From my experience "happiness" in its rawest definition isn't that highly valued in westernized culture. Competition, status, and material gain seem to take an equal if not greater position. In my travels, I'd have to say that other cultures place a much higher value on work-life balance, free-time/vacation, and overall day to day happiness. With other areas of the world booming and the US in the middle of an economic nightmare, I have to wonder if working ourselves into the grave is really the answer.

[-] 2 points by Anachronism (225) 12 years ago

Hey DR - That's right, the study done by Eckley from the oxford journal, draws on many other studies that the "consumer ethos" drives the parabolic public health trends of stress related and mental illnesses. In fosters a addictive mentality that has all kinds of disturbing manifestations throughout society. Which big pharma profits from immensely. Marx called this "commodity fetishization"

[-] 1 points by divineright (664) 12 years ago

Oh, oh...you mentioned the M guy. You're going to set off another red scare here. Lol. In all seriousness though, I'm with you 100%. In a related discussion I had someone explain to me how the government is perpetuating methadone use. A person can go into a clinic and be tested for any degree of opiates in their system. If one has any positive result (which can result from taking a simple painkiller like Vicodin), they are eligible to enlist in the treatment program and receive methadone. The treatment tends to be long term and ineffective. In fact, studies have shown that using heroin in decreasing doses is effective in more patients than the methadone treatments. Here's an article that about treatment and politics getting in the way of the truth:

http://www.choosehelp.com/news/addiction-treatment/heroin-more-effective-than-methadone-in-keeping-treatment-resistant-addicts-from-street-drug-abuse.html

[-] 1 points by Anachronism (225) 12 years ago

MONEY seems to get in the way of truth. There is a new book out studying the recent parabolic rise in anxiety/depression over the past few decades and the pharmacology industry's profit off of it. It basically exposed all the science behind SSRIs as fraudulent and causing the same issues that it supposedly treats. And of course all doctors are somebodies payroll that pushes these medicines

[-] 1 points by divineright (664) 12 years ago

Money does seem to do that, doesn't it? I have seen people get trapped into situations where their doctor is pushing too much medication on them and it's sad. People want to trust the doctors, but when their interests lie with big pharma, that trust is misplaced. I spoke with a friend who is a county medical examiner and he was amazed at big pharma's extensive attempts to gain his favor.

[-] 1 points by Anachronism (225) 12 years ago

Humanities great gains in public and personal health were made by sanitation and a basic understanding of nutrition. I'd say the aggregate of modern medicine as applied to the market place is a net negative. Profit motive seems to distort truth.

btw- I am an ardent anti-capitalist

[-] 1 points by divineright (664) 12 years ago

I agree. Modern medicine has provided some major benefits, but as you said "when applied to the market place is a net negative". Imagine the gains that could be if we embraced higher thinking rather than the simplicity of being profit driven. I'm not necessarily anti-capitalist (though I am against its current rampant form), but for me the conversation doesn't end with the mention of Marx. While he may be criticized for being an idealist, I appreciate and admire his work. We have seen grossly inept applications of his principles which have been largely unsuccessful. In my humble opinion, I think our current system screams with primitive thinking. At the same time, I don't think the world is quite ready for a true Marxist (or similarly derived) system.

[-] 1 points by Anachronism (225) 12 years ago

Well, most of Marx's critiques were spot on - from a systemic standpoint. But as far as the conversation "stopping with Marx" - absolutely not. Capitalism and market dynamics can be criticized from so many more angles today. It's impossible material demands due to it's perpetual growth necessity. The unscientific nature of market economics and just plain old foundational false assumptions. The market mechanism inability to incorporate and value externialities. The psychological effect of marketing to since birth. The instability of how the money/credit system works. When done, it's not left with many redeeming qualities or positive future prospects. Late-stage capitalism is going to be interesting. .

[-] 1 points by divineright (664) 12 years ago

I agree that Capitalism leaves plenty of room for a multifaceted critique. I personally see it as the economic continuation of a primitive dominance hierarchy (unfounded at illegitimate at this point).

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

Give Peace a Chance

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkZC7sqImaM

Two, one two three four

Everybody's talking about

Bagism, Shagism, Dragism, Madism

Ragism, Tagism, this-ism, that-ism

Ism ism ism

All we are saying is give peace a chance

All we are saying is give peace a chance

Everybody's talkin' 'bout ministers, sinisters

Banisters and canisters, bishops and fishops

Rabbis and pop eyes, bye bye, bye byes

All we are saying, is give peace a chance

All we are saying, is give peace a chance

Let me tell you now

Everybody's talking about, revolution

Evolution, masturbation, flagellation

Regulation, integrations, meditations

United Nations, congratulations

All we are saying is give peace a chance

All we are saying is give peace a chance

Everybody's talking about, John and Yoko

Timmy Leary, Rosemary, Tommy smothers

Bobby Dylan, Tommy Cooper, Derek Taylor

Norman Mailer, Alan Ginsberg, Hare Krishna, Hare Hare Krishna

All we are saying is give peace a chance

All we are saying is give peace a chance

All we are saying is give peace a chance

[-] 1 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

Give Peace a Chance

[-] 1 points by Anachronism (225) 12 years ago

I'd say it's about time

[-] 1 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

Ron Paul and whatshisface Huntsman are on our side.

[-] 1 points by Anachronism (225) 12 years ago

http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/cgi-bin/blogs/voices.php/2007/06/01/a_commentary_on_robert_s_mcelvaine_s_the 06/01/07 A Commentary on Robert S. McElvaine's 'The Great Depression' [...snip...] "Elevated levels of consumption are almost always attended by an increase in 'individualism' and a decline in a sense of community. The Great Depression reversed this trend in America dramatically, and for me, that is perhaps the most riveting feature of McElvaine's book as he writes, 'the most significant fact about the Depression era may well be that it was the only time in the twentieth century during which there was a major break in the modern trends towards social disintegration and egoism... The economic collapse that started in 1929 obliged people who had begun to accept the new values of unlimited consumption and extreme individualism to take another look at these beliefs in comparison with the more traditional, community-oriented values that had existed in earlier times.'"


http://www.physorg.com/news134820414.html Money makes the heart grow less fond... but more hardworking [...snip...] "[P]articipants' personal performance improved, and interpersonal relationships and sensitivity towards others declined, when they were reminded of money." [...snip...] "all participants who were reminded of money demonstrated behaviors consistent with decreased interpersonal skills and increased personal performance. Specifically, those participants who were exposed to money spent less time helping a person who needed it, sat farther away from another person and preferred solitary activities. In addition, they showed preferences for working alone and asked for help less frequently."


http://bps-research-digest.blogspot.com/2006/12/price-of-money-selfishness.html Tuesday, December 05, 2006 The price of money - selfishness "A series of experiments have shown that merely thinking about or looking at money changes the way people behave, causing them to be more selfish and self-sufficient." [...snip...] "[P]articipants left with more money after a Monopoly game helped pick up fewer pencils dropped by a passer-by; participants primed with money-related sentences gave less money to charity; and participants sat in front of a money-themed computer screen-saver chose to sit further away from a another participant they were due to chat with."


http://www.newscientist.com/channel/being-human/mg19926714.100?DCMP=NLC-nletter&nsref=mg19926714.100 Why the world is a happier place 27 August 2008 From New Scientist Print Edition Nora Schultz "THE economy is plummeting, the planet could burn to a crisp, and war has just broken out - again. Believe it or not though, people around the globe are happier today on average than they were 25 years ago. The secret seems to be a combination of rising economic prosperity, democracy and social liberalisation. Every few years the World Values Survey (WVS), headed by Ron Inglehart, quizzes about 1400 people in each of 52 countries on how happy they are. Last month it pooled 25 years of data and found that since 1981, happiness has risen in 45 countries. The results challenge earlier studies that happiness levels do not rise along with the economy - something that had led many to conclude that money can't buy happiness. However, these studies often looked at countries that were rich already. The WVS team's analysis shows that ECONOMIC GROWTH ONLY BOOSTS HAPPINESS NOTICEABLY IN COUNTRIES WITH PER- CAPITA GDP LESS THAN $12,000." [emphasis added - Alan2102]


http://www.physorg.com/printnews.php?newsid=134845529 "Happiness and life satisfaction rise steeply as one moves from subsistence-level poverty to a modest level of economic security and then levels off... Among the richest societies, further increases in income are only weakly linked with higher levels of subjective well-being."


http://www.newint.org/issue137/greedy.htm new internationalist 137 - July 1984 Why we want more and more Why are we greedy? "Care clings to wealth: a thirst for more grows as our fortunes grow.' Nearly two thousand years after Horace wrote these lines social psychologist Erich Fromm observed greed is a bottomless pit which exhausts the person in an endless effort to satisfy the need without ever reaching satisfaction'. But while both writers point to the craving for material possessions as a timeless weakness there is a profound difference between them. The Roman poet was condemning a vice on a par with the other classicsins' such as pride and sloth. The contemporary social critic is commenting on an all-pervasive mentality."


http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2007/11/the-consumer-pa.html Scientists Find that Low Self-Esteem & Materialism Go Hand in Hand Daily Galaxy November 13, 2007 "Researchers have found that low self-esteem and materialism are not just a correlation, but also a causal relationship where low self esteem increases materialism, and materialism can also create low self-esteem. The also found that as self esteem increases, materialism decreases."

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 12 years ago

Unlike other long contributions on this forum, this one is beautifully laid out with a tasteful use of MarkDown syntax. Thank you for taking the time to care about your posting. This gives me a reason to care about reading it.

[-] 1 points by Anachronism (225) 12 years ago

Thanks.. Summed up "greed" and materialism is bad for your health

[-] -2 points by LongDaysnight (354) 12 years ago

edit: Your use of clip and paste about issues i agree with made me look at your post. Thank you for having something i don't need to debate or spam.

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 12 years ago

What's the purpose of this cheap attack?

[-] 0 points by LongDaysnight (354) 12 years ago

It's not an attack it is the truth.

[-] 0 points by FriendlyObserverA (610) 12 years ago

I am glad to see there are people out there taking this seriously .

[-] 1 points by Anachronism (225) 12 years ago

There is an immense amount of scientific research on public health problems stemming from economic inequality, increasingly stressful lifestyles brought on by economic changes and the medical "Industry" itself. Two great books on the medical industry are "The Medical Nemesis" and "Anatomy of an Epidemic"

Basically we are making ourselves sick through a confluence of forces, the pharmaceutical industry, in aggregate, is a major detriment to society and all this illness feeds a massive industry.

[-] 0 points by FriendlyObserverA (610) 12 years ago

..and no one is doing a damn thing about it !

well I shouldn't say no one .. because really .. many have voiced their concerns ..

I think it is going to take more than peaceful assembly to bring about the necessary changes we need in society.

[-] 1 points by Anachronism (225) 12 years ago

Yeah, it's going to take a lot and be painful. No doubt about it. But things will, in the medium term, get markedly worse. Quite possibly short term, but it's hard exactly to say

[-] 0 points by FriendlyObserverA (610) 12 years ago

I think part of the problem is that we do not have a viable solution ready for presentation .. and we keep drifting towards the abyss..

[-] 1 points by Anachronism (225) 12 years ago

Well, there are a few out there - though they would require a radical cultural change. There is a lot of vested interest in the ongoing game of money acquisition - those with the most don't wont to let it go. It's like an deadly addiction

[-] 0 points by FriendlyObserverA (610) 12 years ago

yeah , and their addiction is dragging us all towards a cataclysmic destiny

[Removed]

[Removed]