Forum Post: What was the name of that movie?
Posted 9 months ago on Aug. 16, 2012, 5:55 p.m. EST by ZenDog
(15972)
from South Burlington, VT
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
.
[-] 1 points by AsGoesAssangeGoYOU (0) 2 minutes ago
A reminder that online anonymity is a myth, VQkag2, and that you are neither trusted nor welcome here. We will NOT allow OWS to be co-opted. And even if we did, your repetitive wedge issue drivel would never accomplish that anyway.
- ↥twinkle ↧stinkle permalink
.
This is obviously another repelican fraud, a pretender, intent on limiting any debate regarding the merit of any particular policy issue relevant to the political discussion.
Note there is no content relevant to policy, particularly not that policy under discussion when the above quote was made. Instead, what we have are empty threats and innuendo . . . .
and these begin with the name itself. It is an allusion to one Julian Assange, and the government effort to punish his sources and to fashion a muzzle firmly about his mouth.
This cannot be a genuine OWS supporter, but rather a repelican operative, depending upon the most successful of tactics the repelicans possess. They cannot win by debate, and so they engage in theft by deceit, and silence by intimidation.
What can anyone say, in the face of such nonsense?
Only this:
.
hc phone home!!
.
.
EDIT:
I happened to capture the quote above and it's permalink before it was Removed. I would say that calls for a round of cheers for the moderation staff, as it must be quite some chore to keep the forum cleaned up in the face of vandals such as this.
z
Zen, though you may be "defending" against this stuff, your posting as much hateful crap as anyone on this forum. I don't really care whether you're just that far left or if you're just doing your part to maintain the divide but as long as you are posting an equal amount of divisive posts as the troll, you are just the other side of that troll coin. I have always tried to give you a minimum level of respect but this continued 5th grade bully shit is a slap in the face of Occupy.
Do I engage in threatening behavior?
I get rabid, true, and nasty. But generally I do not cyber stalk with a pernicious tenacity, as this individual is doing.
I do not ask that you like my opinion.
But no one can question my steadfast and honest opposition to everything neoliberalism stands for - and I do believe that is indeed in line with OWS - even if there are tactical and ideological differences that exist between my thinking and that of mainstream OWS.
If you are suggesting that OWS does not have room for such difference of opinion - all I can say is that is your opinion, and you are welcome to it. I find it limiting, regressive, counterproductive . . . and so I disagree.
You're sticking up for the 99%, or you're reinforcing the old system. There is no haggling on what that means.
nice spin.
I disagree.
Your contention seems to be the entire system must be done away with. To support that contention, that perception, you insist that this is the only way to stick up for the 99%.
I can assure you, I am in the very bottom of that 99% - among the first of the demographic to feel the pain with every single nickle increase in gas price, or every single small economic contraction.
I am as entitled as any American to my opinion.
IF, as a member of OWS, you do not care for the opinion of one from the very bottom one percent - then go somewhere else.
Go post your own thread.
Perhaps I will come heckle you there.
No sir, it's not spin. http://occupywallst.org/forum/September_Revolution/
I wear flip-flops because I cannot afford shoes, don't look to me for pity. Homelessness, yeah, got the t-shirt. I am poor enough to want change.
how about number one, nimrod -
.
.
.
.
You may be a member, Richard, but clearly you are not very dedicated.
Go Impose somewhere else.
It is you who has been imposing your party doctrine on others. I am not imposing on you, I am using this forum for it's intended purpose. I am welcoming of everyone, including yourself. If you don't want the public responding to you, you shouldn't be spouting off in public. If you don't want to get wet, don't go in the water. But if you decide to go into the water, you cannot then accuse the water of imposing on you.
I'm not going to be one of your little zombie-bots richard.
What have I said?
What have I advocated?
Lets see . . .
http://occupywallst.org/forum/waste-of-time-or-worthwhile-pursuit/#comment-807282
http://occupywallst.org/forum/waste-of-time-or-worthwhile-pursuit/#comment-807352
http://occupywallst.org/forum/waste-of-time-or-worthwhile-pursuit/#comment-807497
.
http://occupywallst.org/forum/class-warfare-you-decide/ July 19, 2012
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Go ahead.
Think for yourself.
or what did I say here:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/part-3-letters-from-nowhere-going-to-noone/#comment-806552
.
And why did you post a second post on the issue of Trap Wire? Self agrandizing, no doubt. Now you are self agrandizing at my expense.
.
z
LMAO, I had no intention of changing you. In fact, I told DK I knew it to be impossible. I am simply making a point and you are fun to debate, until you get pissed. Then you start writing looooong replies and that's not fun :D
I think my position is well thought out - you may disagree with it, but do not suggest that I do not support the 99%.
I have been supporting the 99% far, far longer than the concept has had life in the consciousness of the public.
I agree with your positions, just not your intolerance.
I never said I was not a prick, Richard.
I do not suffer bullies, and do not care for black or white statements that leave little room for alternatives.
There are always alternatives.
Pricks dont write poetry. Or cast themselves online reciting poetry..
You should get out more often if you want to see how real pricks act....
Please go to Burlington and spew your idiotic crap. oh ya, you already did and they told you to take it elsewhere.
hence, you dwell here.
Thanks for continuing to ruin someting thats different.
I don't recall that. I wonder where you get your misinformation?
That was from you.......duh.....man, wake the hell up.
funny, I don't believe I ever said that
I wouldn't have said it, because it isn't true.
Whatever you say dude....good night. Im out. Peace.
Oh Christ now he's speaking for occupy. I think once they get that way you can ignore them. They don't speak for anyone. You're alright Zenking.
Keep on fighting the good fight.
If they can speak for occupy I will.
Occupy embraces Left/progressives ideas and philosophies. Neverright wing wacko crap. I'm not sure Rich the new occupy spokesperson but Do not be detered.
Stay strong.
No worries.
I have some chores I'll need to see to over the next few weeks or so, but never fear.
Your heart is pure. Give 'em hell.
I thought it was the vvv guy. no? Thrassy? Was that his name? I don't know but he is being removed already.
I don't have the resources to conduct an indepth linguistic analysis of hc's posts to determine similarities or differences between his posts and anyone else - but such tools do exist . . .
So I can't say with any authority this new poster is the same as the old poster. I do find enough similarity that I felt compelled to highlight the possibility.
hc can take it with bitterness and scorn, or not. I don't much care. He has used similar, if somewhat more subtle, tactics, with me.
Yeah I can't say conclusively but this guy is being removed it's like he has been banned through his IP. And I don't know if HC has been banned like that.
It is comical though cause this guy is trying to get in his comments out as fast as he can before he gets banned each time. LOL
Funny as hell picturing him typing his nonsensicle hatefilled comments.
What a joke.
20 threads of back patting, neither persons that has spoken at anything relevant in months...
Welcome to the interent.
Make sense, will you. Too much positive comradery for you. Not enough nasty, mean spirited, insults?
I see that - sorry I missed the comments that got removed. Some of these guys have multiple profiles. Hard to say for certain when someone does that unless their language or behavior is somehow distinctive.
This guy may be any one of several others that have been on here - they could all belong to a single person, or a network of three or four people.
Or it is entirely possible this clown is just another sorry assed wrong winger on the verge of leaping . . .
Yes & he is sending message every time I comment it's hilarious.
That is another form of intimidation.
I am not intimidated. he is just pathetic.
Excellent.
Humor when you can find it is usually a good thing.
He's my shadow. I feel so important. I am the biggest threat to the right wing trolls. Moo Hahahahahaaha.
kiddin' I won't let it get to my head.
LoL!
Who is Jiffysquid92? Do we know that one? Or was that thrasy again.
He's such a clever dog!!! Yes he is!!! Yes he is!!!.
[Removed]
He just sent me an email. I think he was around last fall. Could be trashy. Not sure.
I think it is trash. bastard.
thrashy trashy.
For quite some time I was calling him a
He had been posting gay porn as a means of defacing threads he didn't like, and then insisted it wasn't him. I'm sure he is gay, but not at all comfortable being out - and very defensive.
Not that it is my place to either judge, or to out someone. But common. Posting gay porn as a means of shutting down a thread?
silliness.
You're probably right.
[Removed]
[Removed]
[Removed]
[Removed]
[Removed]
[Removed]
[Removed]
[Removed]
[Removed]