Posted 1 year ago on Aug. 3, 2012, 9:49 p.m. EST by bensdad
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
When willard ran for MA governor, Democrats insisted that he was not eligable to run because he was not legally a resident of MA for the required number of years. Willard stated that when he ran the olympics (1999-2000) he filed as a resident of both UT & MA.
This was proved to be a LIE.
Another problem for willard (maybe):
The holder of an offshore account must file an IRS disclosure document ( FBAR ) with their taxes to disclose the account. Willards 2010 IRS disclosure documents do NOT include this key document. But more seriously: so many holders of these accounts did not file, the IRS allowed a 2009 amnesty. What if willard did not file these documents in past years - commiting a felony - before he took advantage of the amnesty program?
Willard - is this the real reason why?
Or maybe Harry Reid is right. Willard - is this the real reason why?