Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: The Queen of England Controls the US Social Security

Posted 12 years ago on Dec. 4, 2011, 6:27 p.m. EST by FrogWithWings (1367)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement



Read the Rules
[-] 0 points by ronjj (-241) 12 years ago

That evidently isn't all that the Queen has her hands on and control of there Frog

Does she have soft hands??

[-] 0 points by BofL (434) 12 years ago

Seems an ugly insinuation, ronjj. What's the score?

[-] 1 points by ronjj (-241) 12 years ago

The score is this. If you choose to post information such as this on a publicly read forum such as this, it seems that YOU should be responsible for the contents being at least somewhat accurate.

The http: references that you provide do NOT even back up your claim.

To show you the score:

Your post 250 years ago and echoed throughout the 13 colonies enough times would have been just cause for the Revolutionary War in and of itself.

I sincerely feel that anyone saying or posting comments in any form on any forum should at least know what they are talking about and not show the world that the Queen was leading them around by their nose.

Sorry for the insinuation, but you put it out there for others to agree or to not agree. I simply DO NOT agree.

[-] 0 points by BofL (434) 12 years ago

I have no clue what your rant is about-I posted nothing here but a question. I can't figure out what you're up in arms about. Here, however, is a thread where I've posted a number of positions I will stand by and defend : http://occupywallst.org/forum/interesting-read-about-the-constitution-and-corpor/ what do you stand for??

[-] 0 points by ronjj (-241) 12 years ago

I stand for truth in written material.

The thesis of this forum is very clearly posted above with supporting http: references. I replied to the forum statement which was made by Frog. You asked what the score was and I attempted to answer your question regarding the score. The YOU etc was the score setting standard which in effect was directed at the person setting up the forum.

I understand that my post may seem to weave between a reply to your question and my opinion of Frog and his misdirected information. Excuse me if I confused you - it was not intentional.

Now going to check out the reference you provided. Thanks.