Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: The Narcisistic and the Anti-Social are Among Us

Posted 12 years ago on Dec. 16, 2011, 1:46 a.m. EST by GypsyKing (8708)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

One of the great advances in psychology in modern times is the recognition of narcisistic and anti-social personality disorder. The knowledge that there are people among us who, sadly, lack the ability to empathise, is something that everyone should be aware of. It goes a long way towards explaining the predicament of mankind. Also, sadly, these people are now over-represented on this forum because they serve a function.

These people are truely frightening to the majority of us, and for good reason. That is the basis of much of their power. It is a serious question to ponder, with no easy solution, but an awareness of the fact is essential when trying to make sense of what is going on here, and in the world . . .

197 Comments

197 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 4 points by pathwhisperer (57) 12 years ago

Absolutely, we have sociopathic (ASPD) posters here. One can tell by their arrogance and thinking patterns (though it would take many pages to describe such patterns).

Anyway, all activists need to educate themselves regarding sociopaths. Quoting myself, "Activists should always worry about sociopathic agent provocateurs — it is a perfect match of talent to task."

"Psychopath earns his keep, Shahed Hussain cons jury as well as Newburgh mugs" http://pathwhisperer.wordpress.com/2010/10/22/psychopath-earns-his-keep-shahed-hussain-cons-jury-as-well-as-newburgh-mugs/

"Prominent Austin Activist Admits He Infiltrated RNC Protest Groups as FBI Informant" http://pathwhisperer.wordpress.com/2009/02/18/items-of-interest-some-recent-some-not-so-some-that-suggest-possible-sociopathy-some-that-scream-it/

Incidentally, I volunteer my services to keep sociopaths off juries for any OWS members facing jury trials (which they should insist on, if they're tried).

[-] 2 points by randart (498) 12 years ago

Please read the book entitled "The Undiscovered Self" written by Carl Young. It will explain a lot about what you are talking about.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I have, thanks.

[-] 1 points by 666isMONEY (348) 12 years ago

Someone recently pointed this article in Scientific American out to me I knew about this because persons born breech tend to have this "disorder":

Schizotypal personality is a milder version of the clinical psychiatric condition called schizotypal personality disorder, which is among a cluster of personality disorders labeled “odd or eccentric” in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The schizotypal diagnosis grew out of large epidemiological studies in which researchers noticed that the relatives of indi­viduals diagnosed with schizophrenia were more likely to exhibit odd behaviors and beliefs than relatives of those not afflicted with schizophrenia. Schizotypal people, for instance, may dress in an idiosyncratic style; their speech patterns may be somewhat out of the ordinary; they may respond ineptly in social situations; their emotional responses may be inappropriate; they may believe in supernatural phenomena such as telepathy and omens; and they may be hard to get close to—both physically and emotionally. In short, schizotypal individuals are eccentric.

Not all schizotypal people have a personality disorder, however. They are often very high functioning, talented and intelligent. Many of my students at Harvard University, for example, score far above average on schizotypal scales, as well as on creativity and intelligence measures.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-unleashed-mind&page=1

http://666ismoney.com/BreechBirth.html

One of my sister's friends at the University of Illinois got an advanced degree in Empathy (really)!

[-] 2 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

I think people who lack empathy and compassion live with a lot of fear. Fear about what they will lose. They also haven't experienced unconditional love. They don't know what it is so they just can't comprehend caring about someone else when there is nothing in it for them. We need to be patient with them.

[-] 3 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Very good analysis of the problem; and yes, we must be patient with them, but not to the degree that we allow them to destroy the world out of their own lack of caring for other people or living things.

[-] 2 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

I agree. We must keep on fighting for what is right even if they continue to curse us out.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Someone once said that - "All it takes for evil to triumph is for good men {and I take this to mean mankind} to do nothing."

[-] 2 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

Exactly. MLK said something similar. That's why I stay on here. I'm not moving to another forum. This is the OWS forum and this movement is standing up to evil. (Here on the forum, instead of police dragging us and pepper-spraying us we get cursed at by right-wingers.)

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Yeah, that's why I'm back here too.

[-] 2 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

I was thinking maybe we should try and welcome more people to the forum. There's probably a lot of OWS supporters reading these threads and itching to participate but they're freaked out by all the negativity.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

That's a good idea. I will do my best to make this forum the authentic word of Occupy, and not just a place for slimy trolls.

[Removed]

[-] 2 points by randart (498) 12 years ago

You can tell who they are by the insults and name calling they feel a need to resort to.

There is a book by Carl Young entitled "The Undiscovered Self". In this book, which is very thin and doesn't take long to read, he describes German society during the second world war. He discusses the cognitive dissonance of those who went out and rounded up Jewish people to be sent to the concentration camps and then went home to eat dinner with their families as if nothing special happened that day. He stated that there are about 70% of the population that have what he called "latent psychosis" where in times of low stress they are seemingly normal people but in times of high stress in society they grow more psychotic. I think this is what is beginning to happen in our entire world today. The collective psychosis is emerging rapidly.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Stress, I'm sure, brings this out in people and the counter to that is self-understanding, and grounding in some spiritual connection. The higher mind has to integrate with the more "primative" emotional mind. The truth is that these parts of ourselves are to some degree divided, and it takes a conscious effort at integration to become "whole."

It has been a drive towards this understanding that I think resulted in the whole field of psychoanalysis. Some part of the cause of this divide is just a fact of human biology, and another is of socialization. I think a percentage of people never really make it through their teenage years with a healthy since of themselves in tact.

But I am really reaching here. The point of my post was esssentially that certain people are more capable of coming into positions of power due to the "advantage" of a lack of conscience, a willingness to do whatever it takes to realize that position and also to maintain it.

[-] 2 points by forOWS (161) 12 years ago

It is stress. You make people live in the economic conditions that are so bad everywhere today and that is what you get. Esp. when you get the NeoCons to choke off jobs, start wars and not give people out of work any choice but to join the military. And then these brave people come back from those wars with post-traumatic stress and that only makes for a very uneasy society.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Well, you took the words right out of my mouth there. What can I say but that I agree totally. This is how these disorders on the individual level, of those who push their way into power over others who don't understand their mental disorder, transfer that disorder to society itself.

[-] 2 points by NewEnglandPatriot (916) from Dartmouth, MA 12 years ago

It is stress , fear, depression, everything. It is all driven by darkness, gloom, negativity, etc. This energy always draws more of it. Then you get positive and get shafted by someone, and you cycle back. It weakens people and they lose who they are and anger takes over. If you let it hurt, it breeds these disorders, which themselves are curable without drugs, etc. It is the culture. Look at anorexia, no matter what because a girl sees herself as fat (compares herself to a model) she is never happy, starves, punishes herself with guilt, never happy, etc. To others she is too skinny. Self image is a powerful projection. It provokes and perpetuates the disorder. Same for drugs, alcohol, you name it. Society judges people, either through us or through the media. Weak minded often fall victim. The culture that exists came from the media, TV, movies, Magazines all of it. Throw away all the propaganda and you are left with just you and me, all of us. Each other.

TV shows like survivor, American IDOL etc, give the power of "judgement" to the public as an outlet. We need to stop this judging, and work together. Turn off the TV - it is toxic, or realize it is toxic, don't attach emotionally.

Guilt is the hell, or the prison in which we punish ourselves. No more guilt, ego or belief systems and bias. The time has come we are all one as humanity. No skin color, no barriers. As one letting go we can win this fight without violence.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Man, I loved this comment. It's so heartening to see that there are people out there who really get it. Thanks.

[-] 0 points by NewEnglandPatriot (916) from Dartmouth, MA 12 years ago

It is real disheartening that the majority fails to see through the darkness like you and I, and lets it control them. People need a punching bag so I give it like it is. Many on here attack me, I attack nobody only exploit the darkness wherever it manifests. If they attack me they attack themselves. This is my mission. When my soul returns to the source upon my death, I may move to level 2 next time around. People have more power in the mind then they realize. I will awaken as many as I can, I am glad to see you keep an open mind. That is one of the keys of true freedom.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

An open, flexible mind, is the key to real freedom. Thanks.

[-] 0 points by NewEnglandPatriot (916) from Dartmouth, MA 12 years ago

No judgment, or bias on people, just issues - do not take absolute sides as this leaves no room for flexibility - no party allegiance - no prejudice - no color/ethnic race - we are the human race - our cultural and ethnic differences make us unique; when we unite on common ground only then we will prevail. Subtly judge within and decide through your actions. Hurt nobody; give advice and let them learn on their own if the blinders remain. We can help each other. It is ourselves that must find the truth with information available. Then with knowledge, the truth will further set you free. Good luck to you.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Good luck to you too, and to all of us.

[-] 0 points by NewEnglandPatriot (916) from Dartmouth, MA 12 years ago

We ALL need it, thank you my friend.

[-] 0 points by occupius (1) 12 years ago

I agree with your post, GypsyKing, but don't think you can do much about the typical OWS's lack of empathy toward the 1%. That OWS's are now over-represented on this forum is hardly surprising. To the best of my knowledge, they always have been.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

The OWS is over-represented on the OWS forum?

And in truth, I think a lot of OWSers do have sympathy for the 1%. I do. I pity people who are so afraid of/incapable of empathizing with other people. People aren't as bad as they think. It's just their execssive wealth that makes them fear so much. Sad.

[-] 0 points by NewEnglandPatriot (916) from Dartmouth, MA 12 years ago

We need the 1%, to keep going - however they are pushing all of the upper 99% down. They control us bottom line, the darkness through greed and corruption is running the show. It is obvious. The rest are under its spell, and many are under the influence of the Stockholm Syndrome. They feel empathy toward the 1%, and support their causes. This leads to surrender of more freedom, and would try to convince us to join them. I am a minority on this Earth (Garden of Eden). Harvest time is just around the corner. I will not sell my soul to their cause. It is difficult, but I will be free no matter how painful it becomes. I sometimes wish that when I died for those 7 minutes, I took the "blue"pill instead of the "red" Yes I died and was given a new perspective. I am for truth, and will do my best to expose the darkness. Good luck to you all, and I love all of you.

[-] -1 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 12 years ago

Do you mean Carl Jung? Did you even read the book? You don't even know the author's name.

Indeed. You can see how the conspiracy theorist become like psycho's when they are stressed.

[-] 1 points by randart (498) 12 years ago

Sorry about the mistake. Yes I did read the book but it was a long while ago. I also read Memories, Dreams, and Reflections.

Sorry for pushing your button there friend and thanks for correcting me.

[-] 2 points by Protricity (5) 12 years ago

nice post.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Thanks. I think it is very relevent to the whole "mood of gloom" that has come over the world. It is like an actual force of evil, that every good intention is thwarted by - we know not what. Well, this is WHAT. It is an aspect of us all, but often those who have it to a level of actual insanity are the ones with the highest drive, and least scruples, and therefore they come to power.

[-] 1 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

Please provide specifics. Such nebulous broad-brush claims serve to do little but to stir up mistrust. If you see such behavior manifested here, why not address it directly? BTW, one person's "breakthrough in modern psychology" is to another person an irrelevant fad.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I never said I saw it manifested on this forum, specifically. Others have made that claim, and in some cases I tend to agree with them. Anyone who has been involved on this forum knows who those people are, and I have no need to provide specifics.

[-] 1 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

I've been involved on this forum, and have no idea at whom you have aimed your psychobabble.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

You don't need to understand, those with sufficient intelligence will. One thing, however. I want to point out that these people spreading anti-semitism are division trolls, and do not in any way reflect the beliefs of those of us genuinely involved in this movement.

[-] 1 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

Oh, so you are tolling. I see.

[-] 1 points by ReincarnationofLard (-10) 12 years ago

Yes, most OWSers are antisocial and narcissistic. Look at the rapes, murders, and assaults committed in large and increasing numbers at all the illegal encampments.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Well, guys like you are good at that stuff, and unfortunately you can't be known just from a quick look at you. That is how you get into the camps and perpetrate these atrocities. What I can't understand (wink) is why the police don't stop it.

[-] 1 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 12 years ago

Welcome to the USA.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I think the USA needs to grow beyond this way of viewing the world. It's incredibly destructive.

[-] 1 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 12 years ago

We wont. When you have "We're #1" shoved in your face since birth- its pretty powerful branding.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Maybe, but it simply doesn't any longer stand up to reality. On the other hand, I've known a lot of people who don't let reality stand up to their preconceptions, so maybe you're right.

[-] 1 points by infonomics (393) 12 years ago

Excuse my pedantry, but there are eight references to narcisistic in this post yet no such word exist. Don't short the narcissistic of his s's.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Sorry, I wouldn't want to short the narcissistic of their s's.

[-] 1 points by maybe777 (11) 12 years ago

I find this thread disturbing, being a lot of the mental health problems in our country are results off emotional and physical abuses caused by the sane.

"The knowledge that there are people among us who, sadly, lack the ability to empathize, is something that everyone should be aware of."

The true awareness needs to be the cause. This thread is in no way welcoming to anyone with mental health issues.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

There are a great number of mental health issues. I am reffering to two specifc ones, which are in some ways encouraged by our culture of "independent, individualistic, self-reliance." The line between self-reliance, selfishness, and outright narcisism is a fine one and perhaps a slippery slope. But the overall question of mental illness is much more broad, and I'm not intending to address that here.

[-] 1 points by ThunderclapNewman (1083) from Nanty Glo, PA 12 years ago

Altruism, Patriotism, The Golden Rule: ideals most Occupiers strive to embody, so let's keep those values in our hearts and minds and attempt advancing those ideals.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

You got it.

[-] 1 points by ScrewyL (809) 12 years ago

By "Narcisistic and the Anti-Social", you must be referring to Thrasymaque and GirlFriday, respectively.

[-] 0 points by GreedKilIs (29) 12 years ago

You forgot me although you can save the respect. I'll drink out of your glass when your not looking, as long as I'm shedding.

[-] 1 points by ScrewyL (809) 12 years ago

I would describe you as merely off-kilter.

[-] 0 points by GreedKilIs (29) 12 years ago

Good, let's go have drinks and I really did burn my lip smoking crack. It's not herpes. Cool, Breauseph?

[-] 1 points by ScrewyL (809) 12 years ago

What are you getting at?

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

This is an issue of increasing relevence to this forum. Please think deeply about the intent of those posting, and not simply about the message itself.

[-] 1 points by TheTrollSlayer (347) from Kingsport, TN 12 years ago

What worries me the most is they are running the country.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

They seem to gradually take over every society because their lack of normal inhibitions allows them to do things that sane people wouldn't even contemplate, to further their power and influence. In many ways the sane are at a dangerous disadvantage here, and we need to wake up and realize that fact.

[-] 1 points by 4TheHumanSocietyProject (504) 12 years ago

World peace is upon us. You have been warned.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Orwell would just love that nonsequitor. It is called congnative dissonance. A great example of this is that all our lives we have been told America is the wealthiest country in the world, and at the same time we have been told there isn't any money for anything. If they can get you to hold both those ideas in your head at the same time then they have won. You will never be able to think clearly on the subject again.

[-] 1 points by OWSsuxbaIIz (0) 12 years ago

OWS is for crybabies and losers. Occupy a job somewhere. Get a haircut, take a shower and get a fukken job.

[-] 1 points by Durandus (181) 12 years ago

If occupiers can be characterized as crybabies, then American culture can be characterized as the world's chief war monger. Were I to stand before my Creator to answer for my crimes, I think I'd prefer to cry that boast of my bloody exploits upon the globe.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Case in point.

[-] 1 points by cmt (1195) from Tolland, CT 12 years ago

This is important because sociopathy is an advantage to someone in a position to become a predator, like someone who works his way up the organization to become a CEO. While there are exceptions, as a class they are predators.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

In a competetive environment those without the ability to empathise have an advantage, because they are willing to do things to advance themselves that the majority would consider beyond the pail of acceptable behavior.

[-] 1 points by cmt (1195) from Tolland, CT 12 years ago

This is especially true when the limits (laws, norms, etc.) that rein in the excesses of those in power have been weakened and frayed.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

That's right. Without imposed limits, these types of personalities have an even greater advantage due to the simple fact that they have no internal prohibitions.

[-] 1 points by puff6962 (4052) 12 years ago

Read, "The Sociopath Next Door," by Martha Stout.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Thanks for these excellent links.

[-] 1 points by BlueRose (1437) 12 years ago

Absolutely! They are wrecking this world.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I agree. Its letting the foxes into the hen house.

[-] 1 points by metapolitik (1110) 12 years ago

I met someone with Narcisistic Personality Disorder once.

No surprises, he was a dyed-in-the-wool capitalist and a successful businessman.

Promised me decent, sustainable employment and a solid partnership, then ripped me off for $10K+.

Live and learn.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I know. Most of us just can't concieve of people getting together to conspire on how to rip-off returing Iraq war veterans of their medical benefits. But there are people who will do it. There are people who will do worse. Strange to say, even though we know this objectively, it's still really hard to wrap your head around it - it's just so . . . anti-social!

[-] 1 points by metapolitik (1110) 12 years ago
  • Antisocial
    • Sociopathic
    • Psychotic
    • Narcissistic

Whatever you want to call them...

Their reign shall soon end.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I hope so. I've been becoming increasingly convinced that what we must do in the short run is take back the Domocratic Party from the corrupt cronies who have taken it over. There are many very solid reasons for this thinking. Tell me what you think.

[-] 1 points by metapolitik (1110) 12 years ago

I think we should organize a Mass Exodus to the Green Party and vote Jill Stein in as the First Green, First Female, US President.

http://www.jillstein.org/

[-] 0 points by economicallydiscardedcitizen (761) 12 years ago

A very similar thing happened to me and another partner. The sociopath can appear to be so likeable, honorable and trustworthy most of the time but then eventually the truth of the 'telling' patterns comes out.

Live and learn indeed...

[-] 1 points by ithink (761) from York, PA 12 years ago

It will not make you feel better, but you could try empathizing with them. They must be frightened. I think this can happen to any one of us when our core beliefs are challenged. For some reason this movement truly frightens some people and threatens their very sense of self. Others seem to be acting by-proxy. As though they have caught the fear in the form of some mental contagion. And as for some other's.. well I think they are so completely identified with fear itself, that they are unsure they would exist were it not for that tight fist drawn down so deep in the belly, hardly leaving room for the shallowest of breath, let alone enough room to actually think straight. A most faithful companion, and the deadliest of allies.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I do empathize with these people; it's just that my emphathy is in their case particularly fruitless.

[-] 1 points by ZenDogTroll (13032) from South Burlington, VT 12 years ago

The knowledge that there are people among us who, sadly, lack the ability to empathise, is something that everyone should be aware of.

That's right, and most of them are repelican . . .

speaking of which,

Action Alert: Stop the End Run On The KeyStone XL PipeLine

[-] -2 points by MVSN (768) from Stockton, CA 12 years ago

Go away DNC butt boy.

[-] 1 points by TLydon007 (1278) 12 years ago

I think we're all narcissists to varying degrees..

It's only when it starts to drag you down along with people that care about you that it should be regarded as a legitimate problem.

Maybe I'm thinking of Borderline Personality Disorder, but I've known a few people that have literally spent their whole lives just forging a path of emotional and financial destruction that effects everyone around them, I suspect to reaffirm a notion of self-worth that can only be measured during times of crisis. One thing I know from experience is that confronting them about it is probably the worst thing you can do.

Sometimes I think Narcissism is what Ayn Rand's followers and some Libertarians aspire to. They're never full-blown narcissists, but I think they're just tempted by the notion of a world where everyone is lonely and everyone is their own island.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Interesting points. I think we are all selfish to one degree or another, and yes, I think what you describe below sounds more like borderline, a disorder usually caused by abuse or neglect as a child. I have always felt very sorry for those afllicted with that.

Narcisism and anti-socal are different. A person can apprear quite rational on the surface, even function normally in society, but either are inable to care about anyone but themselves, or see other people, and living things as of no value. It isn't simple selfishness, but the complete inability to empathize - an inability to connect emtionally at all - even though these people are often good at pretending to do so, generally in mannipulative ways. They almost always leave a train of broken relationships and victims of one kind or another in the wake of their lives.

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I hadn't even heard of this issue concerning Sam Vaknin. Wow, when you start dealing with these personalities you really go on a weird circus ride. But somehow the vast majority of people; the ones that CAN empathise, must wake up to this issue and put a stop to these people seizing power through the sheer relentless exertion of their will.

[-] 1 points by dingy58 (172) 12 years ago

Oh, you must be talking about the police force members. Bullies with boots.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

More, primarily, the peole who control the police. Certainly there are a higher percentage of such people in the police force, but there are many in uniform that truly took the job for idealistic reasons, and I'm sure right now those contradictory motives are causing a lot of controversy and disagreement within the police forces in this country.

[-] 1 points by forOWS (161) 12 years ago

People who lack empathy are psychopaths. George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, bin laden and Saddam Hussein are prime examples of the psychopathic personality or PP. They have no conscience. If they had even an ounce of empathy they would not have committed the crimes against humanity that they did. People who gamble and work on Wall Street are PPs. Many CEOs are also PPs. The crooks from Enron are a good example. Bernard Ebbers of MCI WorldCom, now Verizon, is doing 25 years in prison right now for fraud. Another man without a conscience or empathy. A true psychopath. Many people look up to these PPs and emulate their behavior because if they can do what they did and get away with it then it must be okay.

[-] 3 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Yes, this is central to what humans need to understand to protect themselves, and to form lasting free societies.

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Yes, on this forum it is essential to be aware of propaganda techniques, but we also need to be aware of the real underlying problem in our communities and in our families and in society. People with these disorders cause havoc far dispropportionate to their actual numbers.

[Deleted]

[-] 2 points by forOWS (161) 12 years ago
[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

It's a complex problem that I don't think humanity has heretofore understood clearly, and that we have not yet really come to grips with on the level of family, community, or society.

I think the scariest book I have ever read was (and I may not have the title right word for word) "The Young Joseph Stalin." His combination of an intelligence off the charts, and his absolute lack of empathy for anyone - his unbelievable ruthlessness, made him a one man threat to global civilization. That book was a terrifying eye opener for me. Most people simply want to believe that other people are essentially decent, and for the most part they are right. But there are exceptions, and those "exceptional" people are at the root of a great many of our problems, and they exist across the entire political spectrum.

[-] 1 points by shadz66 (19985) 12 years ago

@LL those interested or so afflicted : http://watchdocumentary.com/watch/i-psychopath-video_b28f60185.html .

fiat lux et nosce te ipsum ...

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Thanks shadz. All those capable of empathizing with our fellow human beings, and the other living things on this planet must come together now, and support one another.

[-] 1 points by shadz66 (19985) 12 years ago

U r wlcm GK. May The Heart-Centred Astral Entities join us soon in our struggle against The Sith !!

ut supra ut infra ...

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Ditto!

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by NightShade (163) 12 years ago

People who do not lack empathy and compassion are usually weak and go on to kill themselves.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Well, you certainly do live up to that enlightened user-name! Guess what, we're not afraid of you guys, in fact you're really just boring. You see, to others the anti-social are just boring because they have nothing positive to offer anyone; unless you have the bad fortune, or make the mistake of letting them into positions of power. You, sir, are just a bore.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

God's Chosen People? How more narcisistic can you get?

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I don't think you can class an entire people in such a manner. That's called predjudice.

[-] 0 points by NightShade (163) 12 years ago

Valfather is right,a whole class of people who think they are God's chosen people and the rest of us soulless souls just here to labor for them. That to me is pretty damn narcissistic and anti-social

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Once again, I would like to point out that this forum has been invaded by those of polar opposite sentiments to those genuinely involved in this movement. OWS is not anti-semitic, and if it were I would not be a member of this movement.

[-] 0 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

When they class themselves as such? Who is prejudiced?

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

We are descending into territory here that is aside from the point of this post. These personality disorders know no single race, group, class or clan. They cross all such boundries.

[-] 1 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

Some psychopathologies have genetic etiologies, some etiologies are congenital, some are due to the physical environment (e.g., exposure to chemical toxins), some derive from arbitrary psychological impacts (e.g., auto accidents, etc.), some are inflicted as part of family dysfunction (e.g., the theory of scripting in Transactional Analysis), and some are programmed by society.

This latter category I call mass psychosis of the body politic. It is this category which I am suggesting applies to a particular group who exalts themselves above the rest of humanity as "God's Chosen People". If this were some purely benevolent self-anointment, it would not be the insidious disease to which I refer.

But the malady in question is xenophobic and hostile to the balance of of humanity. It is therefore in need of remediation.

[-] -1 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

Chirp, chirp...

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

If you are a Nazi, Valfather, why not just have the guts to admit it?

[-] 0 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

Fuehrer worship makes me want to wretch!

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I just had someone send me a great big swastika, so if that is true, you better watch the company you keep. I have had people here telling me that I am a Jew - not true - that I am a woman - not true - and that I am a communist - not true, etc., etc. It seems that common sense is now seen in America as some kind of radical aberration.

[-] 2 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

Hang in there, Gypsy King. I like all of your posts.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Thank you, really. Sometimes I think I am fighting an uphill battle on what is left of this forum. I have always though that we should either hold onto this forum or destroy it.

[-] 2 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

Let's hold on to it. Remember, these trolls are people. I've given this some thought and I really think the trolls are sad, mis-educated people that have been indoctrinated to fight for the interests of the 1% instead of their own interests. It's pathetic. I don't think we should give up. I think we should treat the trolls, maybe with less anger, and with more compassion (like you would treat your slow, inappropriate relative). Keep reminding them of how they are defending the interests of other people and how screwed up that is. And, also, how inappropriate their behavior and comments are. Don't take anything they say personally because they don't know you and their stupid comments only speak about them.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Thanks again. Your comments speak so clearly of the good people in the world, and of their knowledge of a higher order:)

[-] 1 points by beautifulworld (23822) 12 years ago

Yours do too.

[-] 0 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

So you throw around epithets in kind? Psychobabble away.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

You are babbling.

[-] 0 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

As you will. Speak that you might be seen.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

More babbling.

[-] 1 points by NightShade (163) 12 years ago

lol Now we're Nazi's? How can I be a Nazi? Sure i'm a white guy but what has another white man ever done for me!? lol Nazi what a laugh. It's just like the catholic church in Europe a few centuries ago, if you apposed the Churches ideology you were branded heresy. We're heretics valfather destine to burn in the fires of Haiti's chuckles

[-] 0 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

I had a sense he was flailing abut in that direction. I'm glad I ferreted him out. A while back there was a news report about "antisemitism" in OWS. Strangely, all of the people railing against "the Jews" in the video clips looked like Mossad agents.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 12 years ago

I don't know; I have always found this to be a very interesting aspect of our humanity. It would seem that if it serves our purpose, human beings can justify anything. It may be "sociopathic" but it is decidedly not psychopathic if it is common to all.

The reality is that we all need someone to hate or we simply cannot survive.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I am not talking about something that's common to all. On the other hand, it is more common than we might think. These are very serious and destructive personality disorders, and perhaps the saddest thing is that they have absolutely no control over their condition. You simply can't plant the ability to love or empathize, or to have a parenting capacity into people, and some people just don't have them. These people are emotionally destructive because love is essential for healthy human development, and when these people are in positions of power the inability to love can destroy families, communities, and society.

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 12 years ago

It's a rather interesting phenomena. You are interpreting the lack of empathy as a propensity for violence; those that are unwilling to empathize are labeled as sociopaths. And I think there is something askew here.

Three hundred years ago, brutality and violence were integral to life; Freud had not been invented yet...

To empathize is to place oneself in another's shoes... but we only do this when there is a benefit to self; those with whom he empathize ("Look at those poor people") become a tool or a weapon which we aim at another.

Civility is a weapon that serves to maintain the political power structure; likewise it serves the poor in the protection from power that it affords. Rights are a negotiated item and empathy is but a tool.

Where are you going with this? With whom are we now expected to empathize?

[-] 1 points by justicia (58) from New York, NY 12 years ago

"To empathize is to place oneself in another's shoes... but we only do this when there is a benefit to self; those with whom he empathize ("Look at those poor people") become a tool or a weapon which we aim at another. "

That isn't empathy. It's hypocrisy masquerading as empathy. True empathy springs from compassion. The recognition that we are all suffering beings prompts us to try to alleviate another creature's distress instead of turning away from it.

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 12 years ago

Actually it is empathy as defined by Freud.

All of these "feely" words are very poorly defined in the English language.

Be that as it may, compassion and empathy are, omg, two rather distinct words, and you must bear in mind that to empathize is not to offer aid. These are also two different words.

The suggestion of an enforced empathy is also hypocritical.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

"You are interpreting the lack of empathy as a proprsity for violence; those that are unwilling to empathise are labeled sociopaths."

Actually, I didn't say either one of those things, so to respond to your question would be to accept your misrepresentation of what I said.

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 12 years ago

Well, I think you should respond...

"The knowledge that there are people among us who, sadly, lack the ability to empathise, is something that everyone should be aware of."

Where are you going with this?

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Where I am going is - to promote an understanding of an existing, and more pervasive social phenomenon that most people are really aware of. Knowledge is power.

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 12 years ago

With whom should we empathize?

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

You seem to be missing the point of this entire dialogue, and there is no point in reitterating it, as you have it before your eyes.

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 12 years ago

True. It would seem to me, that we have enough of our own problems that we are incapable of addressing. This seems to be particularly true of those who insist that we empathize in an effort to promote the social justice agenda. (We can't solve our own problems, or theirs, so you have to). None of us are capable of carrying the whole world.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Not without the trillions hidden away in secret bank acounts by the corporate elite, anyway!

[-] 0 points by betuadollar (-313) 12 years ago

You're talking about people who have owned the world for two hundred years. And you think a couple million beggars is going to make a difference now?

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

yes

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by justhefacts (1275) 12 years ago

Lack of ability to empathize isn't the only characteristic of narcissistic personality disorder, nor do all people who suffer from it have that specific trait.

Of course...thinking that you have the power/ability/expertise to recognize and accurately diagnose such a condition by reading posts in a forum....is narcissistic on it's own. :)

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I'm not pointing my finger at specific individuals, although the tone of some of the posts here would lead me to suspect that. I'm just trying to throw light onto a phenomenon that people should be aware of.

[-] 0 points by justhefacts (1275) 12 years ago

People who are aware of the phenomenon, or who can be made aware of it, are not the problem. Your post is therefor a delicious irony.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Yes, but the whole point is that everybody else must become aware of them and not be fooled into believing they don't represent a serious danger to society, and here I don't just mean at the common criminal level, but within the larger institutions of society as well.

[-] 0 points by justhefacts (1275) 12 years ago

Dangerous narcissists are a fact of life and have been through the ages. Caesar. Napoleon. Attila. Hitler. Stalin. Robespierre. Mao Zedong.

There is an endless list of them. Informing the world that there are bad guys...and really, REALLY, bad guys out there isn't news to anyone.

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Well, all those names you just mentioned are historical figures, just faces in a book to us now, almost abstractions. The point is that they are real and living among us, and dispropotionately represented in positions of power. That understanding was why our founders called for eternal vigilance as the price of liberty.

[-] 0 points by ronimacarroni (1089) 12 years ago

"Also, sadly, these people are now over-represented on this forum because they serve a function."

Say what?

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I think that is self-explanatory. Think just a little about the quality of the narcisistic/anti-social personality and then read some of these troll posts.

[-] 1 points by ronimacarroni (1089) 12 years ago

You mean people like Loyd Blankfein, Dick Cheney, David Rockefeller or the Koch brothers?

[-] 0 points by ronimacarroni (1089) 12 years ago

Well I don't think the Koch brothers are psychopaths actually.

[Deleted]

[-] 0 points by ronimacarroni (1089) 12 years ago

So who do you think?

[-] 0 points by stuartchase (861) 12 years ago

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGaRtqrlGy8

Here are the kings of inhumane values! They are the Lords of the Dirty Fucks!

http://occupywallst.org/forum/stop-the-evildoers/

The Revolution starts here!

[-] 0 points by kingscrossection (1203) 12 years ago

Actually I was told by an online test that I rank as more of a psychopath than the average liberal or conservative. Oh wait this is online too. Hmmmm

[-] 0 points by LetsGetReal (1420) from Grants, NM 12 years ago

I suspect that people with Narcissistic Personality Disorder are far more common in politicians than in the general public. I suspect that Obama suffers from NPD, if not a more serious psychopathology. These individuals are often very charismatic and adept at manipulating people.

"The narcissistic leader prefers the sparkle and glamour of well-orchestrated illusions to the tedium and method of real accomplishments. His reign is all smoke and mirrors, devoid of substances, consisting of mere appearances and mass delusions. "

http://samvak.tripod.com/obama.html

[-] 3 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I agree that in general those with the drive to become leaders are more prone to be narcisistic, or anti-social. That is why, as many people have pointed out, the first disqualification for any leader should be that they want the job in the first place.

On a larger level though, it is important to recognise the whole existance of the phenominon. Most people simply don't want to believe that human beings are capable of a certain degree of evil. They look within themselves, and don't see that abhorrant failing, and therefore cannot really believe it exists in others. That is a dangerous illusion and it is the reason, as the founders said, that eternal vigillance is the price of liberty.

[-] 1 points by LetsGetReal (1420) from Grants, NM 12 years ago

"Most people simply don't want to believe that human beings are capable of a certain degree of evil. They look within themselves, and don't see that abhorrant failing, and therefore cannot really believe it exists in others."

Exactly! It took me nearly 50 years to recognize this. I can't say that I really comprehend it , but I now recognize what I didn't want to see. There really are many people that driven by psychological forces I can't relate to at all. I am sure there are politicians who are motivated by a desire to be of service to the country, but we must not be blind to the existence of those who are motivated by a lust for power over others. The facade can be very convincing.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Exactly. It is often the loudest, the most tenatious, the most relentless who win the battle for power. These are often the last people that any of us want, or need, in positions of power. And you are right that there are also those who are in power out of a desire to serve. It's just that those positions are often filled by a dispropportionate number of these people who have no scruples about doing anything to get into power, and who have no scruples as to how they use it.

[Deleted]

[-] 1 points by LetsGetReal (1420) from Grants, NM 12 years ago

Well, you don't know me Mary. I'm just a stranger on the internet to you. All I can say is that you are very wrong about me. I care deeply about people, animals, the earth. It is because I care, that I will call out those who don't and I will do what I can, in my small way, to expose them.

[Deleted]

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

In my personal opinion the real powers in this country, exemplified by the likes of Dick Cheney, are more indicative of the anti-social personality than Obama. Obama simply is not enough of an insider to really direct policy. But that is beside the point of the larger issue I am trying to address. The whole phenomenon is, in my belief, not widely enough known or its implications widely enough appreciated.

[-] -2 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 12 years ago

What's this? 5 cent psychoanalysis?

[-] -1 points by MVSN (768) from Stockton, CA 12 years ago

How nice that you are centered and so wonderful that you can judge people. You must be a great intellect.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I'm not judging anyone. These personality disorders an just a fact of life, that most people aren't sufficiently aware of. If you want to know the truth, I have a grest deal of sympathy for people with these afflictions. Of course my sympathy avails them not, nor the other people that they affect.

[-] -1 points by toonces (-117) 12 years ago

You are absolutely right! There are people who sit around in a park and care not that someone has to work to pay for the space they occupy... Not to mention the girls who mind that one of the freaks occupies her vag without her consent, or pay the police officers to protect us from the hoodlums who occupy Seattle who throw bricks at them, or the deadbeats who go in and flashmob Target and Walmart and steal from the floor of the store as well as intimidating shoppers who need to get goods.

I can't believe these OWS freaks lack any empathy towards those of us that have to work to support ourselves.

Great post!

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Well, the rich don't pay for it, so what do you care. In fact the rich are given tax refunds by the rest of us to reward them for being rich, and then they decry social problems. Besides, your simple vulgarity of mind isn't even worth the bother of reading.

[-] -2 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 12 years ago

Ya, I agree. Conspiracy theorist are everywhere on this site. Damned mentally ill illogical vagabonds... they should be rounded up in institutions for the insane. Deface their posts before the spread their malady upon more young innocent minds.

[-] -2 points by elpinio (213) 12 years ago

WHAT are you talking about? There have been NO great advances in the entire history of psychology.

That's why if you get a psychology degree, prepared to be unemployed.

If more OWS people realized that, there would be less unemployment.

[-] 2 points by epa1nter (4650) from Rutherford, NJ 12 years ago

No advances in psychology? You mean since yesterday? The advances have been astounding. Where have YOU been?

Psychology, social work and medicine are among the very few GROWING employment sectors.

I don't suggest you go into any of those fields, though. You would have to able to evaluate evidence and attempt to uncover truth to be effective, rather than operate form your own prejudices.

Better stick with trolling.

[-] 3 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Can you believe some of these "answers?" No advances in psychology? Where do these guys get this sutff?

[Deleted]

[-] 2 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Yes, our interests in life certainly do vary!

[-] -1 points by elpinio (213) 12 years ago

You are comparing psychology to medicine? Is this a joke? Might as well read tarot cards than "learn" psychology.

[-] 2 points by epa1nter (4650) from Rutherford, NJ 12 years ago

Shows how very little you know about the field. Your sweeping statement that there have been "NO" advances in psychology (since when, Freud?) is either intentional hyperbole of pure ignorance.

I suspect a lot of both.

[-] -1 points by elpinio (213) 12 years ago

Name me three important discoveries in psychology. I bet you can't.

[-] 0 points by epa1nter (4650) from Rutherford, NJ 12 years ago

Since when? Since yesterday or since 100 years ago?

[-] 0 points by elpinio (213) 12 years ago

Did I put a time limit? Nice stall tactic. 1000 years.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Unfortunately, it takes a fairly subtle mind to understand psychology and it's implications. Maybe not terribly subtle, but to some degree at least...

[-] -1 points by elpinio (213) 12 years ago

Or maybe psychology is all just BS. Sounds like it if no one can name even three important discoveries.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

I wonder what I would "discover" in the heads of you trolls, a bunch of rocks, a ball off Jello, or just some strange, innert, unidentifiable mass?

[-] -1 points by elpinio (213) 12 years ago

Still don't hear a single discovery or important finding.

[-] 3 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

Uh . . . therapy, which I would recommend.

[-] -1 points by elpinio (213) 12 years ago

yep, that's about the extent to which a psychologist would contribute to society... "get therapy"

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 12 years ago

The Problems of society arise with the problems of the individual. Society is just a reflection of the individuals who comprise it. That is why this post is important - so that people can see the interconnectedness of the problem.