Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Soros, Obama under investigation?

Posted 7 years ago on Dec. 12, 2011, 10:47 a.m. EST by hymie (391)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

That's what Benjamin Fulford, past Asian bureau chief of Forbes magazine says:

http://benjaminfulford.typepad.com/

The fascist cabal known as the Bilderbergers, CFR, committee of 300 etc., is desperately and without hope trying to start WW3 and install a fascist world government in an attempt to pre-empt criminal investigations closing in on them from all sides. Their efforts will fail because the Pentagon and the agencies in the US (with the exception of homeland Gestapo) are preparing to remove them from power, according to CIA and other sources.

For example, multiple investigations are closing in on alleged President Obama, including one for illegally declaring war on Libya. A count among US representatives show the votes necessary to impeach him are there, US law enforcement officials say. In addition, evidence of bribery and other forms of illegally tampering with government is being compiled against George Soros, among others. There is also a lot going on under and on the surface in Europe, Japan and the Middle East.

20 Comments

20 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 7 years ago

i have been watching this go on for 2 years now and called it way before this article. the issue with the article you present, is that obama is the one sicking the dogs on them. obama walked out of the last buila meeting and has not returned. he played them till he got in office now he is sticking it to them. consider This he has tactfully bit bill clinton in public and there is strain between hillary and obama. the clintons still have their hands in the cookie jar so to speak.

[-] 1 points by hymie (391) 7 years ago

Obama is sicking the dogs on whom?

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 7 years ago

the entire pentagon as far as i see. the CIA may make claims to investigating but they are under investigation by the FBI and the CIA can't do shit on american soil or they will be again feeding their own demise. the CIA has been corrupt since Ford. do the research.

[-] 1 points by hymie (391) 7 years ago

I believe that the CIA is divided in two, one part corrupt, you could call it the Nazi faction, and other part patriotic, which could be referred to as the OSS faction.

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 7 years ago

I don't pretend to know that much but it's like when your neighbors are having a knock down drag out fight, hard not to notice.

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 7 years ago

Well, we can all hope there is truth to this and that there is actually a race, not prejudicially being run by only one main and truly capable force alone.

Pardon me if that doesn't make sense.

[-] 1 points by BofL (434) 7 years ago

Makes sense to me...and to add, I say it is WE (collectively ignorant mass) who actually end up pulling the trigger on world war. Everyone is connected somehow to everyone else. When the assets of lower tier criminals start looking threatened, they start pulling back from the syndicate (at least to serve their own interest).

Every single person who wakes to the insidious game being played can wake another. We are making a difference-warning the masses.
We write this chapter. Close it. Start a new book.

[-] 1 points by BofL (434) 7 years ago

Wouldn't that be SOMETHING. Right ideas, short and sweet.

But CIA-central Isn'traeli Agency -come on. Seems doubtful if not ridiculous to expect them to intervene in a positive way. Don't get me wrong-I'm all for people waking up to the problem well described here.

Anyone who wants insight into the Soros central bank cartel - and the sordid history that leads us here http://occupywallst.org/forum/interesting-read-about-the-constitution-and-corpor/

[-] 1 points by hymie (391) 7 years ago

Recently in Israel, the chief of the Mossad intentionally leaked to the public information about Netanyahu's plans to bomb Iran. As a result, huge demonstrations were held by the public in Israel against the war plans. When accused by Netanyahu, the Mossad chief replied "Try to arrest me."

US Joint Chiefs of Staff recently advised Obama to take a stand against Israel attacking Iran. Obama replied that we would be better off not know about it.

As you can see, other sources are confirming that high level representatives of various agencies are turning against the war/finance syndicate.

[-] 1 points by BofL (434) 7 years ago

If true, a renegade Mossad would be a serious threat in itself. Given that we have also Mossad 2.0 (forget the name) running independently as well. That's just the Israeli side. Banksters have pawns in Iran, and obviously worldwide...

Take this little puppet show down the road a ways-imagine how many ways the war games can achieve the desired effect (chaos) while the banksters remain comfortably insulated behind walls far from terror, consolidating their assets.

It's been done this way quite a few times now. The more people are aware of these dynamics the better. Hope people will learn how we came to this point http://occupywallst.org/forum/interesting-read-about-the-constitution-and-corpor/ so we can dust ourselves off, and recover.

[-] 1 points by hymie (391) 7 years ago

Personally, I see Netanyahu as the renegade rather than the Mossad. The Mossad is just trying to protect the Israeli people from the consequences of a war with Iran, which would be substantial, Israel could be wiped out.

The main issue here is that a war between Israel and Iran could trigger a bigger regional war, and by spilling over into Russia and China, as well as damaging their oil interests in Iran, it could trigger a global nuclear war.

[-] 0 points by BofL (434) 7 years ago

We'd disagree there, since it's clear that mossad had a hand in the 9/11 attacks. Mossad doesn't "just" anything. Netanyahoo, just another Rothchild minion with a Churchill complex.
As you state, a main trigger to world war is the oil interest btw China and Russia-and it could well wipe out Israel. What Rothchild builds (Isntrael), Rothchild destroys. The bankster cabal don't give a shekel about Israeli people. There will be a war, it's just the shape and the timing that is variable.

[-] 1 points by hymie (391) 7 years ago

I think you are right about 9/11. But if the Mossad is now against a war between Israel and Iran, isn't that a good thing?

[-] 0 points by BofL (434) 7 years ago

If I accept the straw man, yes. If, as I'm prone to be skeptical, take no criminal entity's official stance at face value, Im more inclined to believe that the public spat between Bibi and Mosaadnik equals the same type of coordination you see in our own govt. Left slaps right, right slaps left, we all get wrapped up in taking sides-forget to duck, and then they both slap us. Same setup. Both sides have taken a stance. Now some outside force that neither has any (direct) connection to will pull the trigger so they both save face-now working united against whatever boogiman they claim "caused" the war.

[-] 0 points by bensdad (8977) 7 years ago

"MIC CHECK" - "DUMB CHECK"


"is desperately and without hope trying to start WW3 AND
install a fascist world government"
"AND"
is one of debate's most helpful words to establish credibility
"the sun is hot and the moon is cheese" - is this T or F ?
The simple analysis of anyone who understands nuclear physics
knows that there will be no world after WW III

nuf said !

[-] 0 points by BofL (434) 7 years ago

When you learn how to spell you can school us in debate.

[-] 1 points by bensdad (8977) 7 years ago

ah yes - talk about what you know - spelling - teacher gives you an A+ now lets talk about how a great speller like you is planning to survive WWIII

[-] 0 points by BofL (434) 7 years ago

Dad, if I were you I'd stick to fathering Ben. If you have a purpose here other than spewing invective, I've yet to see it.

[-] 0 points by fandango (241) 7 years ago

do a search on AGENDA 21 and the bilderbeg group.

[-] 1 points by BofL (434) 7 years ago

I have, and it's troubling to say the least. Search with it codex alimentarius.