Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: ۞ so many ways to criminalize abortion ۞ outlaw birth control ۞ cut taxes for the 1% ۞

Posted 2 years ago on Oct. 18, 2012, 5:15 p.m. EST by bensdad (8977)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

vote for willard
OR
vote for a third party
OR
dont vote

39 Comments

39 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 4 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Repubs against womens rights.! Vote 'em out.!!

[+] -4 points by conservatroll (161) 2 years ago

why don't you google the male pay advantage in YOUR MESSIAH's white house? Course he ;provides unelected female advisors secret service protection (google Valeri Jarret while you are at it....if O had his way, she'd have gotten his US Senate seat but Blago had other ideas).

Vote for your Jill Stein if you have any balls. If she isn't on your state's ballot, then get involved in the Green Party and go schlepp petitions to get more choices on the next ballot. That's all it takes....signatures to add folks to a ballot and you can't start getting them 2 mos before the election.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

I support dems agenda on womens rights, I am against repubs agenda on womens rights.

Romneys, binders of women, token hirings & Pres Obamas admins wage disparity are just distractions.

One party supports policies the supports womens rights, the other doesn't!

3rd parties in America can't wim! I'vebeen throughthatwhen I voted for Nader. Sorry.

[-] -1 points by conservatroll (161) 2 years ago

The Dem agenda on women's rights is pandering, pure and simple. Please google what women get pd in the WH vs men.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

No thanks, It's not relevant. But no matter the election is over!

Now is the time to get in the street and protest all pols for womens rights and all progressive change that benefits the 99%.

[-] 0 points by conservatroll (161) 2 years ago

How can the fact there is a gender pay gap in the dem controlled wh not be relevant to your statement that you support dem position on women's rights? Does this mean you think the gender pay gap is warranted?

[-] 0 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Nope. It means I care about the Dem agenda, & Dem positions on womens issues.

Get with the program.

Oh and I found that there is no real disparity in WH pay for women.

[-] 4 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 2 years ago

^Further proof that both parties use fear as a means to keep it all withing the D/R grasp.

Two 100+ year old parties that DEFINTELY dont want to see the power structure really shaken up here.

[-] 9 points by Nevada1 (4835) 2 years ago

George Washington, warned against a 'two party system'.

[-] 3 points by TrevorMnemonic (5827) 2 years ago

Your propaganda is bullshit.

Suggesting I support or cause these because I refuse to vote for warmongering murderers like Obama or Romney is absolute bullshit.

Maybe if you democrats chose someone who didn't bomb 6 countries in one presidency, I'd vote for your democrat. But you chose a bomber. I do not support war so I refuse to vote for it. I am proudly voting Jill Stein this year. I'm voting for actual peace because BOMBS ARE NOT PEACE

Why aren't the 2 party candidates talking about reforming trade laws to mandate all imports abide by American labor standards? This would bring outsourced jobs back to America as well as improve standards for foreign businesses that want to do trade.

Why aren't the 2 party candidates working to increase minimum wage?

Why aren't the 2 party candidates talking about reforming monetary policy? Currently the system is set up to give unlimited resources to banks and nothing to the people.

Why aren't the 2 party candidates addressing the fact that we're paying interest on a fake debt to the Federal Reserve? Where did the Federal Reserve get the money to buy Government debt? They created it from nothing.

Why aren't the 2 party candidates proposing reforms on drug laws that have contributed to the world's largest prison system in the world? A system for profit prisons are making money on...

Why aren't the 2 party candidates talking about ending the wars today and just staying out of the middle east's affairs?

Why aren't the 2 party candidates proposing medicare for all?

Instead of spending trillions destroying other countries, we should have been spending trillions on building our own.

Reforming policies on these issues would mean the top 1% all the way to the top .00001% would have to become part of the top 10% or even the top 20%.

This is why the top 1% all the way to the top .00001% are spending so much money on candidates that do not work for these issues.

Either way next year with Obama or Romney

The prison population will grow

Bombs will kill civilians

Raytheon will make more money

Americans will be spied on

Wages will remain stagnant

Crony capitalism will ensue

Unlimited resources will be given to banks instead of the people and Goldman Sachs will continue dolling out bonuses for their CEO's

WAKE THE FUCK UP! The status quo is corrupt!

[-] 1 points by Nevada1 (4835) 2 years ago

Good Post

[-] 0 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

I agree with all of this!!

In regards to :

drone strikes, rights violations, & the war on terror.

Could you agree that the root strategy to continue these situations is the fear mongering used to brainwash and illicit the tacit support of the American public?

So while we protest all pols against drone strikes & rights violations we must protest the fear mongering/war mongering.

That is what must be denounced if we truly want to stop these problems!

[-] 0 points by shadz66 (19985) 2 years ago

Brilliant 'TrevM' !!! I ditto 'Mooks' but would change "weeks" to months !! Please consider making a 'forum-post' of your excellent 'cris de coeur' !

pax, amor et lux ...

[-] 1 points by TrevorMnemonic (5827) 2 years ago

Thanks, Shadz. My comment is actually from a forum post I put up earlier this week. It just didn't get any views.

[-] 2 points by shadz66 (19985) 2 years ago

Better late than never ;-) Also for your perusal :

fiat lux ...

[-] 0 points by Grimreaper2 (-318) 2 years ago

Damnit STOP living in reality! You are upsetting people!

[-] 1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Another republican abortion extremist caught spewing his christian fundamental case crap!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/23/richard-mourdock-abortion_n_2007482.html

Vote 'em out.

[-] -2 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 2 years ago

Damn dude.

[-] -3 points by Mooks (1985) 2 years ago

Best post of the week. Bensdad is a clown.

[-] -2 points by conservatroll (161) 2 years ago

Mooks, you are one polite human being, tho you have insulted Bozo and Ronald and all the other intelligent, stand up clowns of the world!

Vote 3rd Party...Me? Gary Johnson, You? Whatever. Until 3rd party candidates start getting at least 10% of the vote they will continue to be barred from debates and a national stage!

[-] -2 points by DanielBarton (1345) 2 years ago

ya think

[-] 2 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 2 years ago

Thats the stuff that real oligarchies are made of.

The right is saying the same message, just switch williard with Barry.

The last thing they want is a real democracy.

[-] -1 points by marvelpym (-184) 2 years ago

What's the most optimal solution?

[-] 3 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Replace anti womens rights conservatives w/ pro womans rights progressives. & protest all pols for womens rights.

Most optimal.

[-] -2 points by Grimreaper2 (-318) 2 years ago

And once again we are back to one party rule. A lot here seem to be pushing that as the ideal. Please to explain how that's not totalitarian/ fascist?

[-] 3 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Which one party are you talkin about?

I'm talkin about progressive approaches to solve problems. Could be Green party, liberal Party, Working family party, independent party, Socialist party, I guess democratic party, & maybe even republican party. As long as they support a progressive approach to solve problems.

Feel better?

[-] -2 points by Grimreaper2 (-318) 2 years ago

And that is still one party rule. Don't be embarrassed or afraid. Say what you mean.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

I have said what I mean.

You refuse to believe it because it doesn't fit your narrative.

[-] 1 points by Grimreaper2 (-318) 2 years ago

Sorry. That's not an answer. Go ask your masters to give you a new narrative.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

It is an answer. I have no masters. I do & think what I please!

What one party are you talkin about?

[-] -2 points by Clancy (42) 2 years ago

Abortion is murder, I know many women who agree on that fact. Don't say I hate women and I'm against women's rights. It's a 250,000 fine or two years in prison for destroying an eagle egg but legal to destroy an unborn child. Explain to me how that makes any sense.

[-] 3 points by VQkag2 (16478) 2 years ago

Eagles have been an endangered species, Humans are overrunning the planet.

So if a women wants to have an abortion why is that a problem? Why is it anyones business what she does with her body.

Why should you have a say?

[-] 3 points by bensdad (8977) 2 years ago

I agree - any woman who believes abortion is murder - should not have an abortion.


If Mr. A pays Mr. B to murder Mr. C,
Mr A & Mr B would be guilty of first degree murder
how many years should they both be sentenced to?


Ms D pays Dr E to "murder" her fetus
Ms D & Dr E would be guilty of first degree murder
how many years should they both be sentenced to?


Have you noticed the connection
between the religious dictators on this issue &
prayer in school & creationism & homosexuality

[-] 3 points by GirlFriday (17435) 2 years ago

Explanation: Don't like abortions? Don't have one.

[-] 1 points by Jencats (20) 2 years ago

certain eagles are endangered species. Humans are not.

[-] 0 points by Builder (4202) 2 years ago

Remain firm in your views.

There is no debate about abortion that is concurrent with #ows issues.

[-] 3 points by GirlFriday (17435) 2 years ago

Hey, Coach-- Good morning.

[+] -4 points by Grimreaper2 (-318) 2 years ago

If Romney wins none of that will happen. And you know it. Why are you saying it.

[-] 3 points by bensdad (8977) 2 years ago

willard has ALREADY advocated all three