Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: OWS has to get real

Posted 12 years ago on Nov. 20, 2011, 3:55 p.m. EST by cunoknobel (0)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

If OWS is supposed to reach ANY tangible results, you need to:

  1. Get a leadership structure.
  2. Move from simple sloganeering to actual demands.
  3. Stop making preposterous comparisons like "OWS is like the Arab Spring."
  4. Keep the conspiracy theorists ("Bilderberg!", "Protocols of Zion!") at bay.
  5. Start your march through the institutions. This has worked before.

Otherwise you'll fizzle out.

25 Comments

25 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by 1776alloveragain (67) 12 years ago

5. Stop wasting time criticizing the people on this site and put out some of your own ideas if you have all the answers. Be a leader, not a Monday Morning Quarterback.

6. Watch Inside Job.

[-] 1 points by OccupyLink (529) 12 years ago

I think that is 6 and 7. He had two point 4s. :)

What is Inside Job?

[-] 1 points by 1776alloveragain (67) 12 years ago

I know he had two point 4s. I was emphasizing his superb mathematical abilities. Inside Job is a documentary that explains how our government and financial institutions deliberately crashed our economy for their own personal financial gain. It leaves not even a shadow of doubt that every single member of Congress should be removed from office, and fat cat execs should be prosecuted, thrown in prison, and their assets seized.

Here is a link to Inside Job:

http://www.movie2k.to/movie-525565-Inside-Job-film.html

[-] 1 points by OccupyLink (529) 12 years ago

Thanks. :) I love your 1776alloveragain. When does our Battle of Yorktown begin? :)

[-] 2 points by OccupyLink (529) 12 years ago

Forget it.

  1. We don't and won't need a leadership structure. 2. We have actual demand - stop the monied corruption of our Democracy. 3. OWS is like the Arab Spring." 4. I agree with no 4. However, they are no really a problem. 5. We are marching through the institutions. We are targeting Wall Street, and will continue to do so. The Wall will crack eventually, and the dam will break.
[-] -1 points by RexDiamond (585) from Idabel, OK 12 years ago

No it won't. It's not even the right target. No matter what you yell or how loud you get, nothing will change doing this. Either you follow the path of the Tea Party or it just remains entertainment for the masses.

[-] 2 points by OccupyLink (529) 12 years ago

Sure. The Tea Party is another Movement. On some things we agree. We will not "follow" the Tea Party any more than they would follow us.

[-] -1 points by RexDiamond (585) from Idabel, OK 12 years ago

I didn't say follow the Tea Party. Follow their path. They are established and effective. They did it rather quickly. How? Organization and a clear message. OWS is exactly what they warned us about when they said the Marxists are coming. Time and time again we see the dumbest people imaginable acting as if they speak for OWS. People believe that this is just an attempt to rally the useful idiots.

What are you going to do to change that?

[-] 1 points by OccupyLink (529) 12 years ago

OK. I can't really answer that. I don't know enough about how the Tea Party got going and how successful they have or have not been. I do get the impression that there are a lot of people with baseball and cowboy hats, waving the American flag and saying "down with Obama" a lot. Probably the OWS movement has some stereotypes also. We are what we are. It is a leaderless organisation, and I hope it stays that way. That is the big strength of the movement.

[-] 0 points by RexDiamond (585) from Idabel, OK 12 years ago

And that's why you will remain in a state of chaos. Cowboy hats? That's what you see? Meanwhile, those cowboys are holding a complete arm of Washington accountable.

Maybe it's time for you boys to put your boots on.

[-] 1 points by OccupyLink (529) 12 years ago

You have hit the nail on the head. The Tea Party doesn't want nationalised health care. Possibly they think that only poor people get sick, and they are too mean to pay for it. The OWS Movement don't want Wall Street or the greedy Banks to hurt the 99% any more. The core issues are quite different.

[-] 0 points by RexDiamond (585) from Idabel, OK 12 years ago

The first statement in your post is false. A fallacy. How can you follow the same path when you don't even see it clearly?

[-] 1 points by OccupyLink (529) 12 years ago

Fair enough. I am not a member of the Tea Party and cannot speak for them. They do criticise any proposals for a nationalised health care system. That is clear.

I do know what the Occupy Movement stands for though. We have a clear message, not muddled as some movement apeear to be.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by gawdoftruth (3698) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago
  1. consensus is a leadership structure. 2. "demands" are not meaningful, problems and solutions and goals are. 3. You are as so many other idiots arm chair directing something over your head, giving us advice which is pathetically wrong, detached from reality, and creating noise which covers the REAL solutions to our organizational problems.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPR3GlpQQJA

I have been active here since the very beginning, and since the very beginning I have been trying to make some core points. These points clearly have not been digested or fully understood by the mob, and so I'm going to try to make a further attempt here again.

  1. Merely protesting in the streets will not bring change. In fact merely protesting in the streets is in fact a means to the end of avoiding the real work of a revolution, which consists of the evolutionary solutions, answers, problem solving process, and new political alignment we create.
  2. This forum is absolutely disorganized. It won't be read by most people and it won't and can't function as a core organizational system.
  3. Back at the very start of this, I petitioned the admin to add multiple sub forums and a wiki. Multiple sub forums were promised but have never arrived. I think that this tells us that the intention actually of this forum is message control and containment. The entire purpose really of this forum has always been to keep us spinning in disorganization. We are hanging out on a forum that expressly exists to actually keep us confused and disorganized.
  4. The real work of a revolution isn't going to happen on forums, it needs to happen in a much more organized fashion using collaborative software.
  5. The assorted other details about how to collaborate, how to work open source direct democracy, how to focus in on science instead of isms, how to become hyper rational about this, are details which are essential and crucial, without which we can predict the movement to fail.
  6. Technically speaking we are not 99 percent, we are one tenth of one percent attempting to represent the 99 percent. Our core mission must be to communicate to and with the 99 percent, and get them to join us. This forum will not accomplish that and neither will any of the other main websites.
  7. You can follow other people out to other wikis and other websites, where they will try to get you to get involved with what they want and their program, but frankly speaking, there is no other website and no other operation out there which understands the complexities involved with meaningful organization. In short, everyones being led to get involved here there and everywhere else, scattering the movement in directions which ultimately do not gain us critical mass, criticial momentum, or critical systemic lucidity.
  8. I have managed to get a wiki put up and have already put on that wiki evolutionary details which make it more organized than anything else. I can't do this alone. There are 10 or so wikis now out there, most of which were created in response to my pleas for a wiki, and several of which are in domains owned and operated by some corporation, (wikia, etc) And which we can thus assume will simply be closed, shut down, or deleted if they become useful to the movement.
  9. Probably at least half of the invites you have to go participate at some other site are people who are scamming everyone to waste time and energy, distort the movement, co opt it, and etc. When you walk off into a closet ask yourself how you know that the closet isn't created by some fed, or by some republican, or by some democrat, in order to sway things in their direction.
  10. The only meaningful strategic option we have for real change in this country is to create a new third party, and take every political office in this country.
  11. Once that is done, we can have an article 5 convention. If we have an article 5 convention before getting rid of the oligachs, that just opens the genie from the bottle for them to abuse that process with their corruption and evil.

For these reasons, I beg of you to please immediately join me on the wiki. We need to have all of these details and all of these ideas put together in an organized fashion, rather than posted in a long scrawl which will never be read.

http://occupythiswiki.org/wiki/THE_99%25_POLITICAL_PARTY

http://occupythiswiki.org/wiki/Main_Page

http://www.followthemoney.org/?gclid=CMbY87bB-qsCFUPt7Qod9HE8mQ

http://maplight.org/us-congress/guide/data/money?9gtype=search&9gkw=list%20of%20campaign%20donations&9gad=6213192521.1&9gag=1786513361&gclid=CP61oYbB-qsCFQFZ7AodcTF0jw

http://www.opensecrets.org/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/our-new-wiki/

http://occupywallst.org/forum/non-violence-evolution-by-paradigm-shift/

[-] 1 points by RedJazz43 (2757) 12 years ago

Have you ever been to a GA? All kinds of people have all kinds of ideas, good, bad and indifferent about what OWS should or should not do. They are shoulding all over OWS. But nobody, so far as I have seen has ever thought through or made any proposal about exactly how to go about getting there ideas implimented by OWS. That being the case, unless shown otherwise, I have to conclude that anybody who proposes something without a means to impliement it is not serious, but just a kibbitzer.

[-] 2 points by OccupyLink (529) 12 years ago

Hi. The movement is there to "stop the monied corruption of our Democracy". This is already happening, as we are on the march against Wall Street and the other finacial "bad guys". The GAs are coming up with the way to make this happen and further ideas to and maintain the support of the 99% and take care of day to day logistics, simply to keep the show on the road. Hey. We are popular guys, and the kids think we are cool!

[-] 1 points by RedJazz43 (2757) 12 years ago

You don't sound very serious to me, nor do you sound particularly revolutionary. That being the case, I can't see how "the kids" as you put it, who are serious revolutionaries, could possibly "think you are cool" or take you seriously. The revolution is about a lot more than a few paltry pieces of legislation or changes a few faces in Congress or even a Constitutional amendment. Read what it says at the top of this page. It says the revolution continues worldwide and that's not hyperbole, or your pathetic legislative nonsense.

[-] 1 points by OccupyLink (529) 12 years ago

That is the difference between being cool and just plain nasty. We are out to "stop the monied corruption of our Democracy" using Arab Spring protesting techniques.

We are not "serious revolutionaries", as such types would frighten most of the 99% and hurt them even more. The kids want what is decent and fair, not what is aggressive amd violent.

[-] 1 points by RedJazz43 (2757) 12 years ago

Read the top of this page, right under where it says Occupy Wall Street. It says the revolution continues worldwide! That is not hyperbole for us. We are revolutionaries. It is true that a lot of liberals attached themselves to OWS undoubtedly as the result of a misunderstanding and the fact that they haven't read the very few documents that OWS has produced very carefully, which is another liberal tendency. It is also the case that while revolutionary we are not sectarian which is why we have been able to reach out so successfully to those who disagree with us, but that in no way negates our radicalism.

[-] 1 points by Chris3141 (34) 12 years ago

Completely agree. The leaderless structure did have some advantages at first, as it drew attention to the cause. But it is now carrying huge costs. It is a magnet for fringe types who scare regular Americans away. And we need regular Americans if we want to get anything done in the next phase of the movement.

I am trying to promote that argument with this post, which already has 170 comments. Please email/tweet it if you agree. Thanks. http://occupywallst.org/forum/ows-is-becoming-increasingly-unpopular-heres-how-t/

[-] 1 points by bensdad (8977) 12 years ago

The capital of democracy is VOTES

Are we too stubborn to learn from Wisconsin?

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by Kevabe (81) 12 years ago

I would say rather than spending all resources on protesting, to get up and actually do something that provides favorable results. Although I do not support the rhetoric I have seen come out of the OWS I do think you have a good number of people who possess more skills and talents than sitting around holding signs and getting arrested. I would say to actually organize a project that brings some solution to people who need it. The spirit of giving is much more contagious than the spirit of taking. Do something that makes others change their perspective of what to expect from the OWS movement.

[Removed]

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by widdles55 (16) 12 years ago

I agree 100%, going as things are going, I can see police really cracking down on this leaderless, demand free, complaining mob of people.

[-] 0 points by ChristopherABrownART5 (46) from Santa Barbara, CA 12 years ago

Minor revision.

2. Move from simple sloganeering to actual MEANS TO GAIN LAWFUL AUTHORITY to meet demands.

but very meaningful.

[-] -1 points by morons123 (131) 12 years ago

they have already fizzled out...thank god!