Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Obama threatening Syria

Posted 1 year ago on Dec. 3, 2012, 9:02 p.m. EST by Coyote88 (-24)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

If Assad uses chemical weapons "there will be consequences". What do you think that means?

25 Comments

25 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

I think it means that Obama, and the financial oligarchy that he represents, want to take over the world, and will offer any justification to do so.

[-] 0 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

Even to the point, perhaps, of NATO carrying out a chemical attack itself and then turning around and blaming Assad. This could be a prep for just such a scenario, or perhaps it's just more anti Assad propaganda.

[-] 1 points by arturo (3169) from Shanghai, Shanghai 1 year ago

Yes, or possibly any of many other false flag scenarios.

[-] -1 points by 99nproud (2697) 1 year ago

You think NATO will launch a chemical attack? Are you insane. Never happen. Too conspiracy/tin hat theory man.

[-] 1 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

Why not, NATO spec ops forces fired over the head of Syrian demonstrations, inviting lethal fire back on the demonstrators (an old trick)? How would this be so different?

Do some research on false flag attacks, if you are interested.

[-] 1 points by bensdad (8977) 1 year ago

This is not a subject to treat lightly.
Obama may blow up the chemical factories or create a no fly zone.
40,000 Arabs killed by Arabs is enough!
Frankly, I'd ask why is this America's to deal with

There are huge Arab military forces - should THEY not be the ones to protect their own? 40,000 Arabs killed by Arabs ?!?!?!? How many Syrians were killed by Israelis during this time?
With all of the rockets Gaza has to launch at Israel, maybe they can help their brothers defeat the Assad monster.

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (22325) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

Why the hell can't the NATO countries in the region be expected to stop the ongoing BS in Their Backyard?

The threat to invasion by the USA increases - Wrong move - but they are using the threat of weapons of mass distraction - ahem - destruction again.

[-] 3 points by bensdad (8977) 1 year ago

I would bet almost anything that America will NOT invade Syria
Bomb maybe
Drones maybe
No-fly maybe


If you really want to be scared
consider Morsi may follow in Assad's and Mubark's dictator model

[-] 3 points by DKAtoday (22325) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

I hope that if we ( USA ) do anything - then - that it is a pinpoint strike against equipment.

Egypt what an ongoing cluster fuck.

[-] 0 points by Coyote88 (-24) 1 year ago

Arab countries won't do anything against their own without leadership(and money) from the West.

[-] 1 points by bensdad (8977) 1 year ago

They HAVE billions in oil
And Allah is their leader

[-] -1 points by DKAtoday (22325) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

Holy Oil? That was being pushed somewhere here in the USA - it's a gift from God - we would hurt God's feelings to stop using his holy gift of fossil fuel death umm energy.

[-] -1 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

Go peddle your Israel-first lies somewhere else. They don't fly here.

[-] 0 points by bensdad (8977) 1 year ago

What did I say that was a lie? or do you just like to call names?

[-] 2 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

Assad's not the monster here. The monsters are NATO's terrorist armies.

[-] 0 points by bensdad (8977) 1 year ago

How many Syrians have DIED at the hands of NATO? How many Syrians have DIED at the hands of Syrians?


I'm not sure that I want to insult, but did you learn your skills at making a point by re-defining words from the republiclans? or George Orwell?

[-] -1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

Assad (and his Russian weapons suppliers) is absolutely the monster. He has slaughtered 30k of his own people.

Isn't that monstrous? We can all agree that 30 years of one families brutal dictatorship should end. No?

[-] 3 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

And what NATO front came up with that 30K figure? The London based Syrian Human Rights Observatory? Bwah, ha, ha, ha.

The plan to destabilize Syria http://www.voltairenet.org/article170470.html

http://www.voltairenet.org/spip.php?page=recherche&lang=en&recherche=syria&x=0&y=0

[-] -1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

So you don't believe the death toll numbers?

This link provides a number of different sources including UNICEF

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Syrian_civil_war

Are you suggesting that the Russian supplied govt tanks, bombs, helicopter, & jets have killed no Syrians? Or a different number?

And what about the the "rebels" do you believe the death toll attributed to them?

[-] 0 points by ivyquinn (167) 1 year ago

Drone, it's the Amerkian way!

[-] 0 points by Gillian (1842) 1 year ago

Let's see. If Obama said that then it could mean many things like maybe he'll send them a warning in a White House Christmas card or maybe he'll spray their date trees with blaze-orange paint ( dioxin/Monsanto) or maybe he'll be divinely inspired by the almighty banks to go to war in order to improve the economy. After all, the government subcontractors provide a lot of jobs for a lot of folks. In all seriousness, whether Obama wanted to go to war nor not is really a mute point since he seems to make decisions that favor profits, not the preservation of human life and liberty.

[-] -1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

Do you mean threatening Assad? I think it means Pres Obama will send a drone up Assads ass if he uses Chem weapons against his own people.

It appears Assads puppet master, arms supplier Russia has also warned him not to do so.

Do you support Assad dropping Chem weapons on the Syrian people?

[-] -2 points by 99nproud (2697) 1 year ago

I think it means we will kill Assad if uses chemical weapons. What do you think it means? Is that ok with you?

[-] -2 points by Clancy (42) 1 year ago

Since Obama is a giant pussy then it probably means nothing

[-] -3 points by RedDragon (-161) 1 year ago

I think that means he's going to send them some money. And as Allah knows, the Brotherhood definitely needs it.