Posted 3 years ago on May 2, 2012, 4:34 p.m. EST by notaneoliberal
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Dennis Bushnell, Chief Scientist of NASA Langley made the statement below; [This transcript is Copyleft 2011 New Energy Times. Permission is granted to reproduce this text as long as the text, this notice and the publication information are included in their entirety and no changes are made to this text.]
J. William Moore: I’d like to [look at] some of the [energy alternatives] that you think look most promising from your perspective.
Dennis Bushnell: The most interesting, and promising, at this point, in the farther term, but maybe not so far, is low-energy nuclear reactions. This has come out of  years of people producing energy but not knowing what it is — and we think we have a theory on it. It’s producing beta decay and heat without radiation. The research on this is very promising and it alone, if it comes to pass, would literally solve both [the] climate and energy [problems.]
Our resident Physicist, bensdad, says it's bs. Any other opinions?