Forum Post: I need an interview subject to a Norwegian newspaper
Posted 11 years ago on Jan. 22, 2012, 1:31 p.m. EST by oleutne
from Oslo, Oslo
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Hi, These days I´m writing an article for the norwegian newspaper Natt & Dag (English: Night & Day) on whats wrong with banking and the political system. I need someone with good insight in the Occupy Wall Street movement and the different views and goals that circulate.
Please step up. I´ve found the Norwegian people are in absolute denial of these issues we are facing, and thats what I now try to do my part of changing.
Please take contact here or at oleutne [at] gmail com
You wouldn't happen to be a royalist, would you?
What? Why do you say that? To answer you question: No, I´m not.
Oh, just wondering, because of the name of your magazing, which, unless I'm wrong, was also associated with the Swedish Royal house.
If you spent much time on this forum you would know that we have to be aware of what angle people are comming at us from. There are a lot of people out to blindly discredit us.
Ah, thank you for asking, then :)
To tell you more about what I´m doing: I´m a student at Westerdals School of Communication, and we have an assignment to write articles for that newspaper. I seriously doubt there is a link there.
My personal angle at this is that I´m sceptic to mainly following:
– The banking system regarding fractional banking. Which have actually gone to the extreme - I interviewed the spokesman for the Norwegian Central Bank a couple of days ago, and what he told med was very confirming of my believes.
– The "hidden hand" in politics. In the US, I understand the Council on Foreign Relations plays a big role in this.
– The SOPA regulation which is attempted to be passed these days was a true awakening to me on where this system is heading and what the agenda is. No one should attempt to give themselves that much power.
That is some of my starting point for getting into this. But I cant write an article about my own personal believes, so I need to get others opinions on the world we are living in. Thats the process I´m in now, and I constantly keep learning new things the further I keep walking down this road.
Thanks for replying. When it comes to the details of banking, there are a lot of people more knowledgeable than I am, and so I wouldn't be a goos subject for an interview on that topic. But you should know that there are at least two distinct contingents here, the American Left Wing and the Liberatarians. So depending on who you talk to you will get very different impressions of this movement. This is a situation which will probably not last because we are at polar extremes, politically.
Ok, that seems like an reasonable explanations for why I´m hearing so different arguments for whats going on and what the occupy movement want to achieve. Would you say I´m right claiming there is a third group as well, who distances themselves from both political parties, who believe both of them are masks on the same face? I´m referring to David Icke´s argumentation in the video I perviously linked to in this discussion: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV9A2IGShuk
I thing I have covered the details of banking in the interview I talked about with the spokesman for the Norwegian Central Bank. At least the facts. But I would like to talk about the opinions of banking with someone involved in the occupy movement.
Do you know anyone I could talk to about that, as well as the one party theories? (To be clear, I personally support the statements that this is a reality)
You might to try to contact "nucleous" on the OWS site. I don't know his depth of banking knowledge, but he is generally very well informed regarding this movement and it's justifications.
nucleus, not "nucleous". http://occupywallst.org/users/nucleus/
oleutne's going to look a long time for nucleous. This user does not exist.
May I ask, do you have Dyslexia? If so, there's nothing to be ashamed of. One of my best friends has Dyslexia and became a great architect.
nucleus is indeed quite knowledgeable, but, like myself, he despises conspiracy theorists. That's why TIOUAISE always called nucleus a troll. Our friend oleutne should probably try to talk with someone who respects David Icke. I have a feeling nucleus is not one of those people. I suggest he speaks with one of the Zeitgeist movie fans, or TIOUAISE who is one of the forum's most established conspiracy theorists.
Are you also an Icke follower? Just curious?
TIOUAISE called me a troll? LOL
Now that's funny, especially after your alter-egos have been banned from this site.
LOL indeed! I NEVER called nucleus a troll.
Cephalus is none other than Thrasymaque, the "tinpot tyrant" of this forum who spouts lies all day long.
For an update on "Thrasy-la-Terreur", see the top of this post:
To be clear, I do not think you are a troll. And, my alter-egos are just fine.
If nucleous does not support conspiracy theories its a great sign that he have credibility in what he is saying. I´m dedicated to facts, and what I´m doing is investigating what the theories of David Icke etc spins out from to find out how much of it I can rely on. What I don´t need right now is more theories.
Again, it's nucleus, not nucleous.
I was asking if GypsyKing had dyslexia, not you. Your spelling seems top notch to me.
Noted. This discussion is getting really messy and its a little hard to keep who´s saying what
He can speak with whoever he pleases, it's a free country.
As free as he or she may be, discussing matters with the non-existant nucleous will be impossible.
Well, you did me the courtesy of correcting my spelling and I assume since he's a reporter that he can read. Maybe I should just use the stupid spellcheck, but yes, I do have dyslexia for whatever that's worth and I don't use the damn thing because then my spelling gets worse. It's a form of self discipline. Now go ahead and vote down all my comments, if that's what trips your trigger.
I have no reason to down vote your comments with my bot. You are one of the best posters on this forum. It gives me no pleasure to use my program to attack other users. This is why I very rarely do so. I only do that to conspiracy theorists and stalkers like TIOUAISE who abuse the forum. When I vote on your comments, I usually up vote them manually. Iv'e never used my bot on you. I have only used it on three users so far, and have only setup it for constant down voting against TIOUAISE since my plan is to destroy this forum character.
Like I said, there's no shame in having dyslexia. I'm happy to know you're not making spelling mistakes because you are being sloppy. The reason you give is legitimate and does not deserve a down vote at all.
Why do you think I should use my bot against you? Personally, I can't think of one reason. Sure, you've called me a troll here and there, but that's only because you've been convinced that I am by your friend TIOUAISE. We disagree about the meaning of the term "conspiracy theory", but so what? A forum with diverse opinions is healthy. I consider censorship a very bad thing.
Do you consider yourself a conspiracy theorist? I ask because you mentioned David Icke, and some ideas found in the Zeitgeist movies.
Just go ahead and release you stupid "bot" on me siphilis, since that's obviously what you are leading up to, dogging me on every post I make. I really couldn't give a damn what my stupid "score" is on this forum, and if you think you can intimidate me with the threat of that you're mistaken.
I was replying to oleutne, not you.
I don't plan on using my bot on you. Why would I do that? I only use my bot on people who stalk me, call me a nazi troll, a paid agent, etc... You have never done this. I have no reason to use a bot to down vote you, and never have. The other day, it was someone else who down voted the comments in your posting with a bot. He got Thrasymaque and April as well. The only person who has to worry about my bot is TIOUAISE, and I had warned him on several occasions to stop stalking me. He never stopped. He's still stalking me to this day. Sorry, but I don't take abuse. I use a bot to counter it.
In all honestly, I find some of your posts interesting. There's not much people posting at this time apart from you, so that's why I'm here. I'm following up on the new posts appearing in the new comments section. You made a mistake and told our friend oleutne to contact nucleous. I helped you and oleutne by correcting that mistake. He would have looked for a very long time since nucleous doesn't even exist.
You are a very enigmatic person.
It only seems that way because you believe your friend TIOUAISE. If you took the time to properly read my comments, you would realize that I'm always honest and would understand where I'm coming from.
By the way, it may be more proper to first ask if you know the work of David Icke and / or Luke Rudkowski?
I think I have a pretty good clue of whats going on. But most of my information have come to me through David Icke and Luke Rudkowski. First of all, is it like most protestants agree with the view of these two individuals?
Absolutely not. There is a cross-section of our population, part of which is involved in Occupy Wall Street, who believe the things that those two people say. However, that group is very much a minority (albeit a fairly vocal one) in both America and in Occupy Wall Street, and most people are here because they don't like the combination of deregulation, outsourcing, and financial misbehavior (particularly the last of those three ) that pushed our country into the recession.
To answer your other question, I am aware of the work of both men, although I find most of it to be laughable. First of all, Icke just makes no fucking sense at all. He argues that shape-shifting aliens that are a cross between vampires and succubi are actually in charge of the world, and that the Moon is actually a giant spaceship used as a base and a mind control machine by said aliens, and that's just the start of the rabbit hole. Rudkowski is less nuts, but there's much less material from him that I can find.
Just out of curiosity, why do you bring this up?
Hehe, by bringing up David Icke, I wasnt meaning to refere to aliens and that kind of statements. A lot of my assumptions of the basic mindset of a protestor in Wall Street is based on this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gV9A2IGShuk
So for the record: It´s not my understanding that Wall Street protestors are protesting against aliens.
Allright, so I understand there is some divisions regarding the statements in the occupy movement. Would you care to attend for an interview in a more practical place than this?
If you are on Skype, you can search for oleutne (in one word). If it says I´m based in Oslo, Norway you found the right me :)
And since it seems there is some different opinions out there, I would like to do several interviews. So this is a message to all who sees this: Would you attend to a short interview?
Probably; what exactly do you have in mind?
Well, I understand that I have some work to do to fully understand the movement and what it stands for. I understand there isn´t a handful of statements that all the protestors agree on, so I would like hear more about your opinion on whats going on. I see it as an opportunity to correct my view, and to base my opinion on more sources of information than what I have today. Thats basically my motivation for wanting to talk more to you.
No problem; what do you want to know?