Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: For those of you advocating the cowardly path of not Voting!

Posted 1 year ago on Nov. 13, 2012, 1:10 p.m. EST by VQkag2 (16478)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

55 Comments

55 Comments


Read the Rules

[Deleted]

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

She was so filled the right wing wacko fear mongering that she went off the deep end. This is a problem with needing to scare the shit out of your constituents. That get scared enough to hurt others.

Take it down a notch. We'll be fine.

[-] 1 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

Wow, they're all so assertive today: American Woman, stay away from me, hee...

[-] 1 points by stevebol (1269) from Milwaukee, WI 1 year ago

mama let me be... he....

[-] 1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

"Can't live with 'em, can't run 'em over with a car"

NOT!

[-] 0 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

You realize these are "control" issues, right? And it has reached that point for many - do as you're told or I reach for the equalizer, which in this case was probably not an F150 but a very feminine Hyundai. Because we know who won that argument. "Equality" is not about equality - these are control issues - it's about superiority, and who's on top. Control is at the center of all heterosexual relationships, control is the reason women voted for Obama. But at times of war and economic strife, the pendulum swings the other way, as women go in search of a savior - that's exactly what's happening in much of western Europe right now.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

So some men (like you?) are hoping for war?

What are you babbling about?.

This is simply a poor women being scared out of her mind by FOX, Rush, Beck and repub leaderships shameful fear mongering. Telling her the world will end if Pres Obama wins.

You reap what you sow boss.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

No, what I am saying is that as a result of our efforts to make the world more economically palpable through persistent war, that the cultural subconscious has sought to inject more estrogen and lessen testosterone. Guided by our women, we have become a far more effeminate male. But when the shit hits the fan in terms of economic catastrophe, and foreign invaders, that subconscious shifts, and women will again loose their control; suddenly men are expected once again to assume a history-movers role.

As a result we now invite more intellectual debate, more emotional appeasement, more conversation... we throw lipservice at this, and at that, but decry any act of solution. We label this peace and harmony and everywhere there is kumbaya.

Ultimately this approach serves to empower our enemies, the enemies of the people. This is very obvious in places like western Europe where hero worship - in women's fantasies, even in the cartoons they feed their children, takes on an entirely new form that Americans are unaccustomed to seeing - in Europe even the American cowboy assumes the lone knight-in-shining-armor persona. It's radically different and it occurs because women there are economically imprisoned by powers they unable to contain and have been subconsciously in search of a lone Knight savior for decades.

Forget Europe, just look at Greece right now.

The world may not end if Obama wins but there will be a rapid expansion in efforts by the world's money mongers - none of it is good for those in the US whose existence is already precarious.

I agree we reap what we sow. America deserves what it gets.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

So women are weaker? And not as capable of dealing with difficult times?

Your suggestions are specious, and sound sexist.

I disagree!

Is that what happened in Iceland after the world wide economic crash (that MEN created) hit them?

[-] -2 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

Well, perhaps not in your case, no. But on the evolutionary scale that has created the sexes, men are physically more capable. What this means, is that ultimately we settle all dispute. Women empower themselves in other ways - primarily through networking and community consensus - they build a coalition.

The ability to reproduce and acquire resources is at the center of all culture; as a result sex commands all culture. And the power pendulum swings continuously in gender shifts.

In the case of an Iceland this shift led to a flight from traditional fields inhabited by men - fishing, right? - and into corporatism and banking while simultaneously men sold a greater portion of their labor to the banker; they allowed a further enslavement in an effort to appease the women and children.

And they crashed. I would remind you that Iceland is genetically Welch - at least one quarter percent - who have always afforded a greater power deference to their women. "Welch" is the reason Henry the 8th split from the Roman Church in a belief system which permitted him a denial of divorce equates to hell scenario. We brought those beliefs to this country by way of Henry's Catholic as Anglican dissenter.

[-] 1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

What are you babbling about? LMFAO! Do you believe this nonsense you spew?

I don't. It's a joke!

And what do you mean "perhaps not in your case"? You wanna talk about ME?

[-] 0 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

What I am talking about is the cultural mindset that exists within us all. All of the main tenants of our belief system are traceable and they are in all of us regardless of ethnicity, ethnic origin, or religious belief.

[-] 1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

blah blah blah!

You do not know the 1st thing about "cultural mindset".

Peace, Good luck to you in all your good efforts.

LOL

[-] 0 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

Cultural mindset driven by subconscious desire is the primary focus of my history; we look outward because we cannot look inward; they key to understanding ourselves is in evolutionary history as it maneuvered its way through life circumstance.

[-] 1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

That doesn't make sense.

Do you think we should encourage people to not vote?

[-] -1 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

Well we encouraged a lot of them not to vote in this election didn't we? The polls were inhabited by women. Think about this; it's hysterical - we now have a perfect formula for winning national elections - the first party to nominate a black secular minded woman wins.

[-] 3 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

"The Gop as evil" is a result of GOP evil agenda. And that is absolutely a major reason for their loss.

So again I submit it is position on issues/policy that matters. Not gender or color of candidates.

Maybe if the GOP would stop attempting to win with gifts to the wealthy they might do better in the future.

[-] -2 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

No, what we will see I believe is the rise of a new evil.

[-] 3 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

The "recipe"in large part was about the policies the candidate ran on!

The gender & skin color is irrelevant.

[-] -2 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

It's irrelevant unless you're a candidate.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

I just did!

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

How wonderful for you. I'm sure your parents are very proud.

[-] 0 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

Yea, you might say that.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

So no to progressiveness? because it is hurtful to people?

[-] -1 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

At heart I'm an anarchist; I abhor paternalism.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

Tax future children? Don't be afraid of the debt/deficit. That will be dealt with as the progressive economic plans are implemented. That fear mongering is just right wing tactic to get support for cutting programs for the 99%.

[-] -2 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

Progressives are so paternalistic... in medieval times those who inhabited the villages as freemen starved during times of famine; the local lords had a responsibility to care only for their serfs. And they did care for them in the form of very high taxation and high interest loans; they grew wealthy doing it and then they capitalized. Several hundred years and nothing has changed; the progressive is the lord of the manor; his version of tax and spend is paternalistic, and we are reduced to serfdom.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

"subsistence"? Progressive solutions would create higher "living wage" tax increases on wealthy. Job creation. increased pell grants, publichealthcare option.

It is the right the creates the atmosphere for subsistence.

[-] 0 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

I'm all for all of that if you pay for it; don't tax the children of our future for what we cannot afford today.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

Nah. Rest assured the people will continue growing this progressive movement and we will move the country from the right & refocus the peoples govt to serve the 99%.

As long as we stay awake between elections. Continue "occupying" the street to maintain pressure on our govt & we will circumvent the new evil you fear.

Don't be afraid. You know what yoda says about fear.

[-] -1 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

Dude, wake up... while you are busy loitering in the street this government is passing corporate legislation; the money mongers do not sleep, they have never slept.

Your Left is but a path to government subsistence. That's not good enough for me; that's not good enough for any young male anywhere in the world.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

Gender & race is irrelevant. Policies are what people consider. Period.

[-] -2 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

haha... that's hysterical. You are attempting to rewrite the history of an election and it is only hours old. Policy didn't win here; what won was this vision of the GOP as evil.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

I think the policies the candidate supports will be the deciding factor.

Don't you? Their gender, or skin color is irrelevant.

[-] -1 points by Saesneg (-166) from Linwood, NJ 1 year ago

Well, no, I wouldn't say that... we've discovered a perfect recipe and we're going to run with it.

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 1 year ago

Hahahaha.

Yeah.

[-] -1 points by DogBone (-201) 1 year ago

This woman is a democrat that hates the village idiot

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

Hatred is certainly part of her makeup but she was clearly a republican supporter.

Mainly though she has been manipulated by the right wing fear mongerers (FOX, Limbaugh, Beck, Tea Party) who rile people up with lies that the Pres is not American, not christian, anti American, and is trying to take there guns, & destroy the country.

Quick run It's Obama, he's gonna destroy America.

LOL.

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by stevebol (1269) from Milwaukee, WI 1 year ago

Doesn't matter who she supported. She nuts.

[-] 3 points by shadz66 (19985) 1 year ago

The facts that she's "nuts" however, probably did inform her vote !!!

multum in parvo ...

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

LOL. I agree

[-] 1 points by stevebol (1269) from Milwaukee, WI 1 year ago

Not voting is legal, running people over with a car isn't. Put her in jail.

[-] 1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

Aaah very astute. Thank you for that.

I agree. She should be in jail.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (28257) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

Woman in Arizona - found to be living in the Twilight Zone.

http://news.yahoo.com/arizona-woman-runs-down-husband-car-not-voting-045426220.html

To silly to contemplate - is this one that was left behind by the education process/system/schools?

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

Yeah better schools might have helped. Or better health care that might have identified her as unstable.

Peace

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (28257) from Coon Rapids, MN 1 year ago

Universal Health Care - perhaps she couldn't get proper care treatment medication.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

Exactly!

"Better living through chemicals"

"mothers little helper"

[-] 1 points by richardkentgates (3269) from Fort Walton Beach, FL 1 year ago

So it is noble to be dishonest and vote for reasons outside your interest? There is nothing noble or democratic about voting for someone who does not represent my interest.

There is no other pill to take, so swallow the one, that makes you ill...

[-] 1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

"noble to be dishonest"? Did I say that.?

I do not think it is noble to be dishonest.

But imagine how many 3rd votes might have come from the 60 million who stayed home. Might make a difference.

[-] 0 points by geeksquad100 (1) 1 year ago

your a shill voting for a piece of shit or a shit sandwich! YUM......and majority of Brain dead fluoride toasted vaccine fried sheep/zombie/drone eats it up like homemade Sunday apple pie! I can barely imagine the cabal pissing and shitting while falling off their chair and rolling on the floor hysterically laughing at you numb nuts!

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

Tell us what you really think!

[-] 2 points by Builder (4202) 1 year ago

Good to C U excited about being here.

[-] 0 points by doitagain (234) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

such stupid shit can happen only in America. f-u in advance

[-] 1 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

U 2.

[-] 0 points by stevebol (1269) from Milwaukee, WI 1 year ago

She wanted him to vote for Romney. It could have been worse, he could have voted for Obama. He'd be dead for sure.

[-] 2 points by VQkag2 (16478) 1 year ago

And yet the majority of voters (that voted Obama) still live!

She was so filled the right wing wacko fear mongering that she went of the deep end. This is a problem with needing to scare the shit out of your constituents. That get scared enugh to hurt others.

Take it down a notch. We'll be fine.