Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: For people who don't like Michael Moore, look at this shit

Posted 11 years ago on Oct. 26, 2011, 6:34 p.m. EST by frankchurch1 (839) from Jersey City, NJ
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Now I finally know why emancipating ourselves from Britain in 1776 was a great idea:


Upper crust, Rush Limbaugh wannabee bastard.



Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by teociontu (29) from Bucharest, Bucuresti 11 years ago

Has Michael Moore stolen those 50 millions ? It's wrong to make successful and meaningful documentaries and earn money for your brilliant work ?

Michael Moore is not against making honest and ethical money. When Michael Moore is attacking Capitalism, he is attacking the rotten part of it. Everyone with minimum intelligence and common sense understand that.

This rotten part includes also detractors, manipulators, deceivers, trolls.

[-] 1 points by ramous (765) from Wabash, IN 11 years ago

No, he's being part of the problem. He doesn't invest in his own pictures, he has producers and investors. Bankers. Movies aren't made on cash.

[-] 1 points by Uriah (218) 11 years ago

Mr. Moore, my favourite propagandist. It amazes me people actually take him at face value while he laughs all the way to the bank.

[-] 2 points by frankchurch1 (839) from Jersey City, NJ 11 years ago

We are not against people making money, we are against unethical money making.

[-] 1 points by ramous (765) from Wabash, IN 11 years ago

moore is worth $50 million dollars, and that sticks in my craw because I don't see him donating to this cause he's supposedly verbally supporting. When I see michael moore logo blankets coming our way during this snowstorm, then he's walking the walk. $50 million, nobody needs $50 million. Tax him he's 1%!!

[-] 1 points by frankchurch1 (839) from Jersey City, NJ 11 years ago

He wants to end capitalism, which would end his career!

[-] 1 points by truthtroll (13) 11 years ago

Try this on. http://youtu.be/JibgblgNdYk

It is the song gimme gimme good lovin. Just Change it to gimme gimme yo money and the word to the girls could be changed to the banks

Yeah... that's the ticket!

[-] 1 points by frankchurch1 (839) from Jersey City, NJ 11 years ago

The tories rot.

[-] 1 points by mutualminds (129) 11 years ago

Say it again Michael.

[-] 1 points by mutualminds (129) 11 years ago

But is what he is saying is true or not?

[-] 1 points by Howtodoit (1232) 11 years ago

he's all about his own agenda, love his docs, but he not anymore one of the 99%, although he says he is...

[-] 1 points by mutualminds (129) 11 years ago

I can't believe no body has commented on this video. Hmmmmmmmm...must be because of the association with Rush Limbaugh.

[-] 0 points by ChristopherABrownART5 (46) from Santa Barbara, CA 11 years ago

Moore evaded answering at 2:48 when the interviewer stated there were no specific demands. Probably because the demands are not backed by any authority, which is embarrasing to admit for any person that understands what it takes to compel government. Laws must be invoked that officials have a duty to uphold.------

When constitutional rights are violated, and the US government has been into this for a long time, then Article 5 of the constitution must be used to create the authority to meet demand. The NYCGA cannot even discuss it.-

Congress is very afraid of an Article 5 because congress has no control IF 3/4 of the states are ratifying Meaning, we need to stay in our states and make the demand for an article 5. We only need 2 more states then congress is in OBVIOUS violation of the constitution and the military, YES, the military will have to defnd the constitution. -

If the state won't, apply, you are looking at a state controlled at key points by the nwo- jack up the pressure! talk about "lawful government" a lot and cite violations of laws on a federal level that impair the states constitution.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convention_to_propose_amendments_to_the_United_States_Constitution "Congress acted preemptively to propose the amendments instead. At least four amendments (the Seventeenth, Twenty-First, Twenty-Second, and Twenty-Fifth Amendments) have been identified as being proposed by Congress at least partly in response to the threat of an Article V convention."

Our first right in our contract is Article V, the right to have congress convene delgates when 2/3 of the states have applied for an amendatory convention.

Article. V.

The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.-------

A effort each evening to create a web conference to discuss Article 5 is beginning.--


Comprehensive strategy.---


[-] 1 points by ramous (765) from Wabash, IN 11 years ago

@christopherAbrown, ok I get the concept, but whats actually happening? When you say we only need 2 more states to say the government is in violation of the constitution for an article 5, what ones do we have, and what are they doing it over? Seriously want to know this

[-] 0 points by alouis (1511) from New York, NY 11 years ago

The tea party, which has an agenda, leaders, staff and money glore would dominate any such convention. be careful what you wish for, you might get it.