Forum Post: Democratic and Republican Super PACs Expected to Spend Hundreds of Millions of Dollars on Advertising This Year
Posted 12 years ago on June 7, 2012, 7:32 a.m. EST by CaptainTony
(-145)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Democratic and Republican Super PACs Expected to Spend Hundreds of Millions of Dollars on Advertising This Year
The 2012 presidential election is almost certain to be the most expensive in history, as the two main candidates set lofty fundraising goals and money floods in to “super PACs,’' independent political committees that have been supercharged by a series of court decisions.
By April it appeared inevitable that neither party’s nominee will accept public funds for the general election or the spending limits that come with them — the likely death knell for a cornerstone of the post-Watergate campaign finance reforms intended to limit the influence of money in federal elections.
Well before then, it had become clear just how deeply the campaign finance landscape has been changed by a 2010 Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. In the case, a bitterly divided court ruled 5 to 4 that the government may not ban independent political spending by corporations, as well as labor unions and other organizations, in candidate elections.
The decision and subsequent court rulings led to tens of millions of dollars in donations — often by wealthy individuals, of as much as $5 million at a time — to super PACs supporting candidates in the Republican primaries.
By April, when Mitt Romney emerged as the likely Republican nominee, Romney aides and leading donors were preparing a major expansion of the campaign’s fund-raising efforts to prepare for a general election contest against President Obama, with the goal of raising up to $600 million.
And Mr. Obama, who raised $750 million in 2008, is likely to meet or exceed that this year, according to people involved in his fund-raising operation. Mr. Obama opted out of the public financing program in 2008, breaking a campaign pledge, and went on to outspend the Republican nominee, John McCain, by four to one.
In addition, super PACs on both sides are expected to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on advertising this year and have tested programs more traditionally associated with campaigns, like voter identification and turnout.
Source:
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/c/campaign_finance/index.html
More:
at leats you're not bumping your own post, all you did yesterday was accuse me of doing what you clearly are doing, how funny!!!!
Look public funding for elections will be needed to do anything about this and the GOP stand in it's way, it's clear what we must do ,get rid of the GOP you have have said nothing to counnter that postition, your ONLY purpose here is to protect the 1%. Good luck with that .... you'll need it
You posted "Support Obama, beat Romney!!!" and for doing so I think you should be banned from this forum. OWS is out to end the corporate-controlled two-party tyranny, not perpetuate it.
I get Obama and Romney confused
they're both Harvard Men like Bush
Keep in mind who you are arguing with here. It's not exactly representative of occupy.
Why OWS needs to remain apolitical:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/citizens-united-wins/#comment-756458
Reply to DoubleVoice:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/why-do-republicans-hate-unions-and-working-people/#comment-756431
So for the price of nothing more than an occasional bone, the ruling elite sucker Sheeple like you into perpetuating their two-party tyranny by supporting the Democrats with your sole justification being they are the lesser of the two evils. Sad. Very sad indeed.
Reply to JusticeforTrayvon:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/how-dare-they/#comment-756451
It's not really "corporate handouts": It's ROI from their bribes and campaign contributions.
Reply to JS93:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/citizens-united-wins/#comment-756432
Republicans and Democrats win battles, but neither side will ever be given enough strength to win the war. The objective is to assure the perpetuation of the two-party tyranny. Remember: it is no coincidence that of the last 14 U.S. presidents 7 have been Republican and 7 Democrat...
Reply to Factsrfun:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/obama-never-campaigned-for-tom-barrett/#comment-756356
You posted "Support Obama, beat Romney!!!" and for doing so I think you should be banned from this forum. OWS is out to end the corporate-controlled two-party tyranny, not perpetuate it.
Reply to Factsrfun:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/a-question-so-you-believe-a-racist-is-any-white-th/
This is clearly a sock puppet posting by you, and for it you should be banned from this forum.
Reply to Factsrfun:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/this-is-a-diane-rehm-show-taking-about-where-we-ar/#comment-756363
We are well aware you are here to promote the Democratic Party and Obama, so certainly you don't see Chris Hedges as a leader. We do, and repeat his advice on how to vote here:
"Don't waste any more time or energy on the presidential election than it takes to get to your polling station and pull a lever for a third-party candidate - just enough to register your obstruction and defiance - and then get back out onto the street. That is where the question of real power is being decided."
Reply to Factsrfun:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/this-is-a-diane-rehm-show-taking-about-where-we-ar/#comment-756353
The Democrats will be raking in hundreds of millions just like the Republicans, regardless of what their take from unions might be.
Dems unleashing corporate-money floodgates?
http://galesburgplanet.com/posts/15016
Obama's super PAC problem:
http://economy.money.cnn.com/2012/05/21/obamas-super-pac-problem/
Reply to JS93:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/why-do-republicans-like-scott-walker-want-the-stat/#comment-756416
Nothing could be further from the truth than to suggest Conservative politicians are corporate whores but Liberal politicians aren't:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76363.html
Democrats rush into arms of Super PACs
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76363.html
Notable quote from greedy Demopublican corporate puppet:
"The problem is the limits. These new super PACs exist because of the contribution limits we've placed upon parties and candidates. Get rid of the limits on contributions and super PACs will go away and you'll have full disclosure..."
http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2012/jun/07/league-of-women-voters-running-ad-about-super/
Reply to JS93:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/even-though-big-dirty-gop-trumped-democracy-for-wa/#comment-756407
The Democrats have their hands out for Super PAC money just like the Republicans do. Both parties and all their candidates are corporate puppets. Never think or suggest otherwise.
Reply to Factsrfun:
http://occupywallst.org/article/occupy-wall-street-activists-offer-2-million-bribe/#comment-756403
You posted "Support Obama, beat Romney!!!" and for doing so I think you should be banned from this forum. OWS is out to end the corporate-controlled two-party tyranny, not perpetuate it.
Raise your voice against super PACs:
http://www.timesdaily.com/stories/Raise-your-voice-against-super-PACs,191339
Pro-Democrat super PAC initiates 'Fire The Donald' fund:
http://leanforward.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/05/12069522-pro-democrat-super-pac-initiates-fire-the-donald-fund?lite
Reply to Factsrfun:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/why-do-republicans-hate-unions-and-working-people/#comment-756381
And partisan Obamapologists like you should be banned from this forum.
Reply to Factsrfun:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/why-do-republicans-hate-unions-and-working-people/#
This posting proves you don't know any more about business than you do about government.
Reply to Factsrfun:
http://occupywallst.org/forum/obama-never-campaigned-for-tom-barrett/#
Vote all you want, however you want. Nothing we can do by voting in rigged elections will change the fact that our next president will be "Bushbamney".