Posted 3 years ago on Oct. 25, 2011, 7:03 p.m. EST by Jonas
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
We stand at the brink of hostility and change and we take neither - what, again, are we walking for?
I do not stand as some extravagant protagonist, seeking everyone's ultimate demise - I'm simply abetting some sort of thought processing behind everything that we, you, they are doing.
We, as a country, have stood behind the bombing of countries that have agitated far less - so why do we keep pushing? Are we seeking that inappropriate slap back in order to simply keel over and announce, "Told you so!" Yet if we are not reared, can we simply be allowed to walk and do whatever we like? Have we, in concurrence, actually placed ourselves above the law? Or, in more realistic idealism, are we simply pretending to be above the law until we are appeased just enough to settle our racing hearts and clenched fists?
Are we manipulating the government in the same way that we feel we are controlled? Giving them no choices but the ones that will aid us in our great cause to decapitate them?
Who here stands for the separation of a country over the exact thing that we are battling against? You need so much to be recognized as existentialists yet you are waging war for the sole reason of monetary value and who deserves the right to have it or control it or manipulate it. So, you'll split an entire country over money tiffs?
I'm not seeking to agitate the mass that has become, nor debase it's value - I'm simply looking for some sort of accountability for what is happening and some sort of relativistic understanding and cognitive awareness.