Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Acid Seas Threaten Creatures That Supply Half the World's Oxygen

Posted 9 years ago on June 19, 2014, 9 p.m. EST by LeoYoh (115)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Acid Seas Threaten Creatures That Supply Half the World's Oxygen

Thursday, 19 June 2014 00:00
By Martha Baskin and Mary Bruno, Crosscut | Report

http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/24463-acid-seas-threaten-creatures-that-supply-half-the-worlds-oxygen

What happens when phytoplankton, the (mostly) single-celled organisms that constitute the very foundation of the marine food web, turn toxic?

Their toxins often concentrate in the shellfish and many other marine species (from zooplankton to baleen whales) that feed on phytoplankton. Recent trailblazing research by a team of scientists aboard the RV Melville shows that ocean acidification will dangerously alter these microscopic plants, which nourish a menagerie of sea creatures and produce up to 60 percent of the earth's oxygen.

The researchers worked in carbon saturated waters off the West Coast, a living laboratory to study the effects of chemical changes in the ocean brought on by increased atmospheric carbon dioxide. A team of scientists from NOAA's Fisheries Science Center and Pacific Marine Environmental Lab, along with teams from universities in Maine, Hawaii and Canada focused on the unique "upwelled" zones of California, Oregon and Washington. In these zones, strong winds encourage mixing, which pushes deep, centuries-old CO2 to the ocean surface. Their findings could reveal what oceans of the future will look like. The picture is not rosy.

Scientists already know that ocean acidification, the term used to describe seas soured by high concentrations of carbon, causes problems for organisms that make shells. "What we don't know is the exact effects ocean acidification will have on marine phytoplankton communities," says Dr. Bill Cochlan, the biological oceanographer from San Francisco State University oceanographer who was the project's lead investigator. "Our hypothesis is that ocean acidification will affect the quantity and quality of certain metabolities within the phytoplankton, specifically lipids and essential fatty acids."

Acidic waters appear to make it harder for phytoplankton to absorb nutrients. Without nutrients they're more likely to succumb to disease and toxins. Those toxins then concentrate in the zooplankton, shellfish and other marine species that graze on phytoplankton.

Consider the dangerous diatom Pseudo-nitzschia (below). When ingested by humans, toxins from blooms of this single-celled algae can cause permanent short-term memory loss and in some cases death, according to Dr. Vera Trainer, an oceanographer with NOAA's Fisheries Marine Biotoxins Program. Laboratory studies show that when acidity (or pH) is lowered, Pseudo-nitzschia cells produce more toxin. When RV Melville researchers happened on a large bloom of Pseudo-nitzschia off the coast of Point Sur in California, where pH levels are already low, they were presented with a rare opportunity, explains Trainer, to see if their theory "holds true in the wild."

Multiple phytoplankton populations became the subjects of deck-board experiments throughout the Melville's 26-day cruise, which began in mid-May and finished last week.

Another worrisome substance is domoic acid, a neuro-toxin produced by a species of phytoplankton. Washington has a long history of domoic acid outbreaks. The toxin accumulates in mussels and can wind up in humans. "Changes in the future ocean could stimulate the levels of domoic acid in the natural population," says Professor Charles Trick, a biologist with Western University in Ontario, and one of the RV Melville researchers. Which means that the acidified oceans of tomorrow could nurture larger and more vigorous outbreaks of killer phytoplankton, which could spell death to many marine species.

During their nearly month-long cruise, researchers observed the most intense upwelling in California, which is typical for spring and early summer. Upwelling may increase off the coasts of Oregon and Washington in mid-late summer and fall. The research team took multiple measurements and water samples off all three coasts in waters of both low and high pH. Part of their hypothesis is that concentrations of essential fatty acids are lower when pH is low. They need to establish what exactly "lower'" means, but the bottom line is that fewer essential fatty acids means a less nutritional diet for fish and other organisms.

If the interaction between CO2, ocean acidity and nutrient supply to phytoplankton and other ocean-going creatures isn't something you can wrap your head around, try this: Every second breath you take is due to phytoplankton. Those single cells generate the lion's share of the world's O2. "If they're out of balance," says Trainer, "the rest of life on earth is going to be out of balance."

This article originally appeared on Crosscut.com, an online news organization committed to helping make the Northwest a model for sane and sustainable 21st century living.

This piece was reprinted by Truthout with permission or license.

41 Comments

41 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 4 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

[ EDIT ] People - if you are curious as to the processes of the Earth - how it functions. Then watch a good little NOVA program = Earth from space ( I think - very close to the title if not the title ). Anyway disregard that the Koch,s actually fund NOVA and just consider the "natural" processes - then - if you have the brain juice - consider how those natural processes are fucked up by our ( humanities ) toxic processes ( this is where I think the Koch's flirt with shooting themselves with their sponsorship of such programs = EDIT -> Subconscious desire? to get found out? = to be clearly recognized as a destroyer! TO BE STOPPED ).

WE ( humanity ) are killing the planet by the toxic practices WE employ and the planet is an unwilling accomplice in it's own death ( our death if you can grasp that full concept ).

[-] 1 points by StillModestCapitalist (343) 9 years ago

I do remember NOVA. What an excellent program. I didn't know that if was still being broadcast. If I get a chance to catch the re-run at my parent's house, I will. I do believe that we are going to end up very close to extinct along with many other species because we are too stupid and spoiled rotten to learn from our mistakes and those of others before us like the people of Easter Island. I don't know if we will go totally extinct and I don't know just how bad it's going to get over the next hundred years or so but it is incredibly frustrating to see two steps taken back for every one we take forward on the environment lately. We got over the CFCs and that was great but it was also a very easy fix. There was no actual sacrifice necessary. There will be if we have any chance in hell to stabilize our negative effect on the climate or the global food supply or the health of our planet in general. It doesn't need to be pristine but damn. With the lost rain forest, climate change, the growing issues with land fills and water treatment, the growing population, the relentless competition among developed and developing countries and all the related issues you bring attention to with this entry, it will be a miracle if we can keep treading water for another few decades. The only bright light will be the one we aren't around to see. Because the climate won't begin to stabilize and many other issues including these which you bring to the table won't begin to improve until we are gone or at the very least, on our way out. It's issues like these that begin to explain why even some who may know better just bury their head in the sand and pretend it's all ok.

By the way, I saved one of your replies the other day but what I meant is that for every one person we reach with exhaustive efforts, the bad guys corrupt two with ease. Their megaphone is much louder than ours.

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

Why wait - here is the link

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/earth/earth-from-space.html

Then there is also another good vid ( if one disregards the guy at the beginning talking about continued fossil fuel extraction and use ) :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=76ujMtLr5Z8

Also a current lie being pushed continuously by the American Petroleum Institute: Natural Gas - it's good for you - it's good for the environment.

The fuckers conveniently fail to mention the toxic and destructive extraction practices = fracking.

[-] 1 points by StillModestCapitalist (343) 9 years ago

I don't have a problem with the continued extraction and use of fossil fuels in general just as long as we cut no corners, keep the efforts as clean and safe as possible (within reason), and we GET OUR CONSUMPTION DOWN lowering it gradually until we reach a point where our negative effects on the environment resulting from our extraction and consumption are stabilized. That being said, of course I have a problem with it because those terms will never be taken seriously by those who stand to profit the most. Or those who refuse to make any sacrifice of any kind.

What I don't know is just how big of a problem to have. It's all dirty to some degree. However, I can't rightfully demand a quick and complete transition to alternative energy sources in good concience knowing (just a clue really) how difficult such a transition would be even with the best of efforts. That being said, I don't have a strong opinion about fracking. Of course, I would expect a heavy environmental impact within the immediate area surrounding any extraction site. Also surrounding any waste disposal site. I've heard both sides of the argument and I fully realize that no 'for profit' industry can be trusted to tell both sides of the story accurately. The opposing sides often exaggerate as well.

In order for me to develop an informed opinion on the issue, I would need to see at the very least, a few extraction sites and the surrounding areas up close or one hell of a good documentary produced with no regard for politics or profit. Until then, I just won't be sure how to feel about the fracking process. What I do know for damn sure is that no extraction or disposal drilling site should be located anywhere near a large body of water, an especially sensitive area, or an active fault.

Sorry, I know you're very passionate and knowledgeable about this issue but at this point, I don't know where to draw the line or under what circumstances to draw it.

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

I don't have a problem with the continued extraction and use of fossil fuels just as long as we cut no corners, keep the efforts as clean as possible (within reason),

[ EDIT x 2 ] Problem is - we have gone way past reasonable ( easy ) extraction - which has never been done cleanly to begin with - and have gone on to Mountain Top removal for coal ( again not done anything remotely related to clean ) and Fracking the bedrock to release oil and natural gas and in the process polluting the air with major methane leaks and polluting the soil and water with the toxic chemicals used in the process as well as escaped product being extracted - btw = also causing some earth quakes due to the process..... then there has always been the disposal of the waste ( waste of the processed or otherwise used fossil fuels ) = never been clean or contained.

And when one can get all the hydrogen ever needed completely cleanly = no fossil fuel required. Why then continue the use of fossil fuels and their toxic wastes? Tar sands ( the worst toxic source ) now being sought for use as cleaner sources are fast disappearing for extraction/use.


EDIT -> It is not ALL dirty to some degree or another. Waste from hydrogen separation from water - is - oxygen - that is if it is not also collected for use - say in medical oxygen containers. Burned hydrogen or hydrogen used in a fuel cell - processes through as water vapor = clean.

As to difficulty of transition - 1st watch that 2nd vid = Hydrogen Natures Fuel. How better to invest 85 billion dollars a month rather than pour it out on the ground such as is being done with wall street QE ( quantitative easing ).

2) According to 97% of climate scientists - We can not burn all of the fossil fuel that has already been extracted and is currently held in reserves.

So - I suppose - that if it could be processed "CLEANLY" for the hydrogen content - since it has already been extracted and can not be used as is = petroleum product. Sure why not go ahead and process it for the hydrogen contained therein. But we can not continue to extract fossil fuels - as explained earlier.

[-] 1 points by StillModestCapitalist (343) 9 years ago

I am flat-out against mountain top removal. Not that a mountaintop leveled flat can't recover. Of course it can. But I do feel that the initial impacts of mountaintop removal are just too drastic.

When I said it's all dirty to some degree, I was referring to fossil fuels. Even with the best and most noble efforts, a near complete transition to alternative sources would take decades. That's what I believe. After all, there are millions of gasoline and diesel engines out there in use as we type. My car and lawnmower among them. I can't demand a total and timely transition to alternative sources in good conscience so I must be willing to forgive a certain degree of environmental impact from the sources currently fulfilling our demand. That being said, I still want our consumption DOWN.

I do respect your opinion of fracking but I must also take into consideration what I've seen in my own region. It's been active for several years. Of course, the ground zeros are all dirty. I can assume that much. But aside from the minor Earthquakes caused by improper disposal of waste water near fault lines, I'm aware of no impact whatsoever. The trees are green, the birds sing, the deer, frogs, turtles, and bugs all look fine to me.

I've had my eyes and ears open for several years now and I've witnessed nothing whatsoever aside from some clear cutting. Which by the way, I hate but again, I do believe in compromise and a certain degree of tolerance.

That being said, I still need more evidence in order to develop an informed opinion. In fact, I'm going to start making inquiries. I want to see at least one extraction site and one disposal site up close. I want to see just how wide the effected areas are with my own eyes. I may even take my own water samples and have them tested.

Of course, you know how I feel about greed and corruption. I'll fight them both tooth and nail until I take my last breath. But I still can't in good conscience demand that an entire industry of such importance shut down or transform overnight.

One last thing for now. I will NEVER take anything the industry has to say as gospel. I can't even watch a commercial for breakfast cereal without sniffing around for a rat.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

http://nofracking.com/

Lots of information - LOTS.

OH and a simple test of water quality can often times be no more expensive than a box of matches or a lighter with a long nose - just turn on a tap and see if you can light the contents as they come out.

[-] 1 points by StillModestCapitalist (343) 9 years ago

Reminds me of an article from a very old edition of National Geographic. Same issue different decade.

[-] 1 points by StillModestCapitalist (343) 9 years ago

I will check it out and save it for future reference. By the way, when I post an entry, I generally give it a quick read and a quick edit if necessary. I'm a two fingered typer, i'm a backtracker, and I'm on my mom's tablet. I hate tablets but I'm here for a visit and that's all I have access to.

I'd much rather be on my 10 year old laptop. Full keyboard. No auto-corrections. Like I said, I hate tablets.

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

Also if you have not seen it - look for Gas Land - should be available on-line. Sorry about all of my edits - but I try to respond quickly and then after sending off a comment often find that I had more to say or could have said it better- or both.

[-] 1 points by StillModestCapitalist (343) 9 years ago

Ok. That's fine. I do the same thing I just don't point out the edits unless they come hours or days later.

[-] 1 points by trashyharry (3084) from Waterville, NY 9 years ago

Long walk.Short pier,The planet will be fine.WE will be going away.Protoplasmic slime will be left to do whatever it wants.Zen koan:Will Money still be the master when there are no people left?

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

The planet will be fine. WE will be going away

Yep - given time ( couple ten twenty millennia? ) - the planet "will" be fine - Us? - hmmm wonder if people figure that going away would be to another planet or if they figure going away as in dying out?

It seems that many figure that we will go away by leaving this planet for another one.

HUH - funny thinking "that". When one must consider that to travel to another planet - we will 1st need to master clean energy and clean industry - so as to be able to travel the vast distance to another planet - living in a far more limited/closed environment.

HUH - funny that.

[-] 2 points by trashyharry (3084) from Waterville, NY 9 years ago

I don't think spaceships can solve the problem.We are going to need a fucking time machine to avoid the Terminal Clusterfuck.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

If only - Hey? Go back and fully support Tesla and the 1st electric autos. To take that other fork in the road and concentrate on replacing the use of toxic fossil fuels with other better alternatives. So many alternative choice opportunities - so many opportunities not taken.

We at "this" point in time do not have to go terminal - BUT - it will take a tremendous "all in" effort - starting pretty much today - to not go terminal.

[-] 2 points by trashyharry (3084) from Waterville, NY 9 years ago

The People,united,can never be defeated-repeat.

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

Exactly - repeat - repeat - repeat - repeat...............................to infinity

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

Repetition "is" an effective tool. Gotta have some good tool usage going on to combat/defeat all of the obscene tool use = natural gas good for you good for the environment. The Fuckers - lets not talk about your extraction processes and how toxic/destructive they are - hey?

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

Zen koan:Will Money still be the master when there are no people left?

[ EDIT ] How about - if the planet is poisoned and we are not aware - will "we" still be poisoned too? Um sorry - not quite as abstract a koan as yours.

Abstract? or Inconsequential ! Huh.

EDIT -> Not that people being gone could be considered inconsequential - but the money still remaining - would be. Huh - wonder if that sentence just gave a CEO or a Board member an ulcer = money inconsequential. Heh Heh HEH

[-] 1 points by trashyharry (3084) from Waterville, NY 9 years ago

Zen koan:If everything in the world disappeared except 3 obscenely wealthy hedge fund managers and a coconut,would Money still be the master?

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

Whats the coconuts name? Because till there is just the one survivor and it - it is the master of the situation watching the fools kill each other. Lets call it money. And then it's name would transpose to eaten - and the eater soon to be starving - money ( the obscene amounts ) would remain - as always - indifferent. Sorry I could never leave well enough alone.

[-] 1 points by trashyharry (3084) from Waterville, NY 9 years ago

The name of the coconut must be-CROATOAN.You are a Zen Master,There can be no doubt.

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

You are a Zen Master

[ EDIT ] LOL - Surely you jest. They were on on Roanoke Island? Are you sure it's name wasn't "despondent" or "depressed" or "resigned" ?

EDIT -> Roanoke Island - huh - if only they all went there and had the mysterious disappearance experience.

[-] 1 points by trashyharry (3084) from Waterville, NY 9 years ago

Maybe Broad & Wall-or Zucotti.Occopy Wall Street Forever.

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

Distappearing in New York - hmmm - while perhaps a mystery - still - not nearly as mysterious as Roanoke. But fortunately more likely as well. Lets keep our fingers crossed - Hey? {:-])

[-] 1 points by trashyharry (3084) from Waterville, NY 9 years ago

We must & shall prevail.Crossing of fingers as well as everything else we can do is a reasonable suggestion,IMHO.

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

My legs are cramping - hard to walk this way - BUT - if there is the slightest chance that it will help - then - it's all good. {:-])

[-] 1 points by trashyharry (3084) from Waterville, NY 9 years ago

There are some powerful evil forces rolling at large on this planet.There is nothing so bad they won't do it,so any confidence builder is worth doing,IMHO.

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

Gottsta think positive and help others to do so as well - we are after-all facing a minority a very small minority - no matter how evil they are - they are the very small minority that needs be removed from influence.

[-] 1 points by trashyharry (3084) from Waterville, NY 9 years ago

We must,and shall prevail.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

[ EDIT ] And we have seen some startling and pleasing defeats of the puppets in office. There IS real Hope.

EDIT-> Bitch McConAll the new majority leader? HAH - hopefully the next dark money puppet reelection failure - Hey?

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

ZOOM - wow what the f . . . oops - sorry that one went burning straight over my head.

[-] 1 points by trashyharry (3084) from Waterville, NY 9 years ago

I hate the idea of a mystery that can never be solved.It is what it is.You are a Zen master and a fine human being.I have to get up early to dig and haul dirt,so we will have to resume our conversation some other time.SOLIDARITY FOREVER.

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

Roanoke - very definitely some long time ago mysterious shit.

Thanks for the compliments - back at ya.

Good Night.

I'm starting to get cross eyed myself.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

In Compliment: It's only been two weeks since the EPA took the wraps off its new Clean Power Plan, but things have already gone up a notch. I have some bad news and some good news.

First, the bad news. Fossil fuel billionaires like the Koch brothers haven't stopped their fear-mongering about climate action. The Washington Post gave one ad from the National Mining Association "Four Pinnochios" for lying about electricity costs,1 but the ads are still running.

But there's good news too. In just two weeks, climate activists like you have already sent over 600,000 messages supporting the climate protections in the Clean Power Plan.

Now is your chance to join them. Submit an official comment to the EPA. Don't let the Koch brothers get the last word!

This is the beginning of what could be the biggest climate fight in history. Fossil fuel billionaires are mobilizing like never before. They're already sending their lobbyists to Washington and spreading their fear-mongering talking points on Fox News. You'll keep seeing their misleading ads on TV and hearing them on the radio.

The billionaires that are bankrolling these ads want President Obama to think that Americans are afraid of tackling the climate crisis. But it's the coal, oil, and gas industries that are running scared. They're scared that cleaning up their own mess might cut into their profits.

Don't let the fossil fuel billionaires drown us out. Flood the White House and EPA with 10,000 more official comments by tomorrow saying that America supports a strong Clean Power Plan!

Last month's National Climate Assessment2 made clear what you already knew: that our climate has already changed, and that droughts, wildfires, and superstorms are the result of runaway climate disruption. When crops fail, when towns get flooded, and when heatwaves send kids and seniors to the emergency room, it's not Big Coal footing the bill.

All of us are already paying the price for climate disruption -- but the steps taken in the new Clean Power Plan may give us our best shot yet at turning the tide in the climate fight. Take action now!

Thank you for all you do,

David Scott Sierra Club President

P.S. Six messages are more powerful than one! After you take action, forward this message to five of your friends and family or share it on Facebook and Twitter.

References: 1) A bogus claim that electricity prices will 'nearly double' because of clean coal technology, Washington Post, 5/23/2014 2) National Climate Assessment, May 2014


What I added:

Further:

Acid Seas Threaten Creatures That Supply Half the World's Oxygen

People - if you are curious as to the processes of the Earth - how it functions. Then watch a good little NOVA program = Earth from space ( I think - very close to the title if not the title ). Anyway disregard that the Koch,s actually fund NOVA and just consider the "natural" processes - then - if you have the brain juice - consider how those natural processes are messed up by our ( humanities ) toxic processes ( this is where I think the Koch's flirt with shooting themselves with their sponsorship of such programs = Subconscious desire? to get found out? = to be clearly recognized as a destroyer! TO BE STOPPED !!! ).

WE ( humanity ) are killing the planet by the toxic practices WE employ and the planet is an unwilling accomplice in it's own death ( our death if you can grasp that full concept ).

[-] 2 points by Nevada1 (5843) 9 years ago

Signed

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

Good deal - we have got to make ourselves heard through every medium and organization we can.

[-] 1 points by 99nproud (2697) 9 years ago

Target the pols against climate action!

(signed)

Our lives depend on it.

http://www.nationofchange.org/republican-leaders-threaten-another-government-shutdown-over-climate-action-1403357695

FYI,

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 9 years ago

And now time for something completely different:

Jon Stewart on Senate GOP's continued denial of global warming

Ummm - No It's Not.

What?

It's not Completely different.

Oh - well....um.....

[-] 0 points by 99nproud (2697) 9 years ago

Informing everyone of this problem, the inadequate actions (below), and the dire consequences is the 1st most difficult challenge.

http://www.pewenvironment.org/news-room/other-resources/obama-administration-pledges-to-protect-us-oceans-85899546669?utm_campaign=2014-06-19%20Latest.html&utm_medium=email&utm_source=Eloqua

Most people don't even think about the ocean, let alone appreciate how dependent we are on it, & how close we are to the point of no return.

[-] -1 points by 99nproud (2697) 9 years ago

Ending overfishing

In compliment:

http://act.oceanconservancy.org/site/MessageViewer?dlv_id=40609&em_id=30463.1

The fight continues

Great post