Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
Retribution Against the Financial Elite!

NATO3: Cop Cell Phones Lost or Destroyed, New Motions to Dismiss Charges

Posted 10 months ago on June 14, 2013, 8:38 a.m. EST by OccupyWallSt
Tags: Chicago, Solidarity, NATO

Free the NATO5

via interoccupy.net:

Brent Betterly, Brian Jacob Church, and Jared Chase (known together as the NATO 3) were brought in front of Judge Thaddeus Wilson on Tuesday, June 11th for another status hearing. They were accompanied by multiple sheriffs deputies and a court full of supporters watching closely over the proceedings. The proceedings provided more information on the Chicago cops failing to preserve their cell phones and text messages from the investigation, which appear to be significant pieces of evidence in the State’s politically motivated prosecution. The defense also introduced a couple more motions to dismiss charges.

Assistant States Attorney Matthew Thrun submitted the prosecution’s response to multiple ongoing discovery issues still standing from the court’s ruling four weeks ago. This response was accompanied by hundreds of photographs stemming from the pre-NATO Summit surveillance program spying on activist groups in Chicago planning protests last spring.

Contained within the prosecution’s answer to discovery was the revelation that officers involved in field intelligence team 7150 (the unit in charge of all pre-NATO surveillance and infiltration) destroyed or disappeared personal cell phones used during the investigation. It seems that multiple officers in the unit used their personal cell phones to exchange information between themselves and different officers as well as their supervisors in the course of the operation. According to the material offered up to the court today by prosecutors, the private cell phone service providers used by the officers did not store their text message data and the officers mysteriously (and conveniently for them) no longer have those phones in their possession. Thus, these crucial pieces of evidence will not be available to the defense.

Additionally, the prosecution failed to hand over the First Amendment worksheet and subsequent re-applications for this worksheet. The court had ruled four weeks ago that these internal police department documents were to be handed over to the defense, and on this issue Judge Wilson was clearly frustrated with the clear stalling tactics. Wilson instructed the prosecution to tell high-level police officials that “this court has a schedule and I intend to stick to it,” adding that he would issue a ruling to show cause if the documents had not been handed over to the defense before the next court date. He went on to say that “the federal court would be appalled to learn that [...these files...] are not in order to be presented.”

Defense attorney Michael Deutsch also noted that the State’s discovery submissions have been coming on the dates of court hearings (rather than before a scheduled hearing to give the defense time to review the info in advance). The State agreed to submit the info on Thursday, June 20th, five days before the next hearing. The judge said that, if the State plans to submit Brian’s post-arrest statement at trial, then they are to submit a list of the police officers who will testify no later than Wednesday, June 12th.

Finally, the defense issued another round of pretrial motions to strike down the ludicrous charges targeting these three activists. Attorneys for Brian Church issued a motion to dismiss counts 7, 8, and 9, all of which are arson charges. This motion challenges statements made by Brian immediately after being arrested and seeks to make them inadmissible, thus eliminating the arson charges. Attorneys for Brent filed their own motion to declare all his charges unconstitutional due to a violation of due process from the grand jury testimony being used against him.

On June 25th, the court will reconvene for further status updates and an evidentiary hearing regarding Brian’s latest motion. That means that officers involved in the field intelligence team will be called to the stand. Let’s pack the courtroom on June 25th and stand in solidarity with the NATO 3!

You can also show your solidarity by donating to the support fund. Donations can be made online or by sending checks or money orders to: “8th Day Center/Nato 5 Defense Fund” in the memo line to:

8th Day Center for Justice
205 W. Monroe St. Suite 500
Chicago, IL 60606

To keep up-to-date, sign up for our announcements listserv by emailing nato-5-announce-subscribe@lists.riseup.net, find us on Facebook at Free the NATO 5! , and follow us on Twitter @FreeNATO5.”

8 Comments

8 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by navinkumar46 (4) 10 months ago

Occupy wall Street movement should see this video at the link:- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSRLubc2cu4 This will convince the reader about the advisability of shunning Chinese Goods coming to US.

[-] 1 points by navinkumar46 (4) 10 months ago

Occupy Wall Street should follow the following three points to take their movement to high moral ground assuring victory to the 99%. 1. Follow Vegetarianism like Gandhi 2.Purchase home made goods only like Gandhi. This will kick start manufacturing in big way within country opeing up millions of jobs. 3.Lead a simple life, ie possess only that you need. This will improve your home budget. VICTORY IS ASSURED IF THE ABOVE THREE POINTS ARE FOLLOWED.

[-] 1 points by JPB950 (2254) 10 months ago

Any victory Gandhi had was due to the fact that he stood for something that a vast majority in his country accepted as a shared goal. The 99% do not, as yet, share a clear goal that they share.

Vegetarianism is a matter of personal choice, the other two points are counter productive. Buying home made goods may spur manufacturing, living more simply does the opposite.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 10 months ago

Contained within the prosecution’s answer to discovery was the revelation that officers involved in field intelligence team 7150 (the unit in charge of all pre-NATO surveillance and infiltration) destroyed or disappeared personal cell phones used during the investigation. It seems that multiple officers in the unit used their personal cell phones to exchange information between themselves and different officers as well as their supervisors in the course of the operation. According to the material offered up to the court today by prosecutors, the private cell phone service providers used by the officers did not store their text message data and the officers mysteriously (and conveniently for them) no longer have those phones in their possession. Thus, these crucial pieces of evidence will not be available to the defense.

Issue multiple charges of BULLSHIT and OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33128) from Coon Rapids, MN 10 months ago

The proceedings provided more information on the Chicago cops failing to preserve their cell phones and text messages from the investigation, which appear to be significant pieces of evidence in the State’s politically motivated prosecution.

Subpoena the records from the telephone and internet data collected by the gov. Freedom of information.

The defense also introduced a couple more motions to dismiss charges.

Damn straight - even if only for the destruction of evidence by the police.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by stylemalls (0) 10 months ago

Welcome to http://www.stylemalls.com//

where is the most popular Panthers online shop.

((( http://www.stylemalls.com/ )))

lower price fast shippment with higher quality!!

WE ACCEPT CREDIT CARD /WESTERN UNION PAYMENT YOU MUST NOT MISS IT!!!

[Removed]

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by salvorappa (7) 10 months ago

(it) _in democrazia la giustizia é sempre dalla parte del potere.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 10 months ago

interesting (1) 40 minutes ago

Perhaps not dead, but on a life support unit. There are still some General Assemblies which are active, but they average 5 to 30 members and have mostly stopped publishing GA minutes. Basically, the hardcore folks of Occupy. Hardly what GA meant at the start of Occupy. I personally don't really count these. I could get a few friends together and hold an Occupy General assembly in my city, with like 10 people. Not sure what that would mean. Is is really direct democracy for the people, or some kind of private meeting between friends?

More here from the Occupy General Assembly Research Project:

http://interoccupy.net/blog/preliminary-findings-of-the-occupy-general-assembly-research-project/

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 10 months ago

public records should be public

Obama administration strikes deal to buy small arms and distribute them to foreigners