Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
We are the 99 percent

FDR's 1944 State of the Union Address, better known as the Second or Economic Bill of Rights

Posted 6 years ago on Aug. 20, 2011, 8:36 a.m. EST by agnosticnixie

In 1944, for his state of the union address, president Franklin D. Roosevelt presented a social and economic program which would have expanded on the original bill of rights. Most of it was a radio address, as he had the flu, but part of it was filmed (the footage was found recently). Similar programs are found in modern constitutions, and part of it would inspire the universal bill of rights. Obviously, it didn't pass. FDR would die barely a year later, and this would die with him. Their inspiration can be found in the writings of enlightenment philosophers, already, but also in early socialist thought, up to the current day.

As an example, the language and the rights used could be found in the principles of the old french socialist party, who had formed the government before WW2, and whose principles would end up being part of the preambles of the 4th and 5th republics' constitutions, but also in the, admittedly symbolic, soviet constitution of 1936. These sentiments were repeated in the modern constitutions of Peru, Spain, Finland, Ukraine, Romania and Bulgaria.

The speech

It is our duty now to begin to lay the plans and determine the strategy for the winning of a lasting peace and the establishment of an American standard of living higher than ever before known. We cannot be content, no matter how high that general standard of living may be, if some fraction of our people—whether it be one-third or one-fifth or one-tenth—is ill-fed, ill-clothed, ill-housed, and insecure.

This Republic had its beginning, and grew to its present strength, under the protection of certain inalienable political rights—among them the right of free speech, free press, free worship, trial by jury, freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures. They were our rights to life and liberty.

As our nation has grown in size and stature, however—as our industrial economy expanded—these political rights proved inadequate to assure us equality in the pursuit of happiness.

We have come to a clear realization of the fact that true individual freedom cannot exist without economic security and independence. “Necessitous men are not free men.”[2] People who are hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made.

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:

The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

The right of every family to a decent home;

The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.

For unless there is security here at home there cannot be lasting peace in the world.



Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by EllaSP3 (2) from Union, MO 5 years ago

I prefer Eisenhower's "Military-Industrial Complex Speech" myself.


[-] 2 points by alterorabolish1 (569) 5 years ago

FDR had some great speeches, wish they were read more today.

[-] 1 points by fate (1) from ブリッジポート, CT 5 years ago

FDR was certainly far from a perfect leader, but he had the right idea by advancing these ideas. He didn't invent these; the radicals of the day did. It's up to the dreamers of this era to not only bring these goals back into the mainstream, but add to them the collective human knowledge gained in the 70 years since, as well as the ignored wisdom of the indigenous and marginalised.

[-] 1 points by riethc (1149) 5 years ago

Great post

[-] 0 points by TrevorMnemonic (5827) 5 years ago

great post

[-] 0 points by PetadeAztlan (113) from Sacramento, CA 5 years ago

August 7, 2012 ~ The above article is good, but very narrowly focused. To hell with just thinking about Amerika, as if the US is the central focal point in the Cosmos. FDR was a fascist. Under his Empire building our modern-day fascism was allowed to lay its groundwork.

If anything we should remember the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights and quit reinventing the wheel. Yes, the UN is screwed up too. We should be able to relate to basic universal principles, regardless of their origin.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights ~ http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/ ~

U.S. Bill of Rights ~ http://1.usa.gov/etuaxS ~

“If you have come here to help me, you are wasting your time. But if you have come because your liberation is bound up with mine, then let us work together.” – Lilla Watson

Venceremos Unidos! We Will Win United! Peter S. López AKA @Peta_de_Aztlan ~ Sacramento, California, Aztlan c/s