Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Your Duopoly is NOT a Democracy

Posted 3 months ago on April 19, 2014, 12:30 p.m. EST by JGriff99mph (507)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

http://www.occupy.com/article/christina-tobin-reforming-politics-make-all-elections-free-and-equal

This is how a duopoly functions, eliminating decisions, reducing choices and providing two corporate wrapped solutions to every problem.

https://www.facebook.com/imminentrebellion

10 Comments

10 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by granada (38) 3 months ago

Good post. Third party candidates definitely do seem to be the answer.

[-] 1 points by stevebol (1269) from Milwaukee, WI 3 months ago

The duop ended in 1963. It's all about carpetbagging now.

[-] 0 points by shooz (17816) 3 months ago

https://occupywallst.org/forum/bernie-reacts-to-the-koch-support-of-the-scotus/

You must have missed this by accident, so I'm posting it here for you edification.

If you would be so kind as to state how that vote and it's dissenting opinions went?

And then tie that into your Alex Jones style conspiracy theory?

[-] 0 points by shooz (17816) 3 months ago

https://occupywallst.org/forum/how-many-of-these-do-you-support/

shall I put the list here, so you don't have to open the link?

So you understand who's activism is winning?

[Removed]

[-] -1 points by ZenDog (13421) from South Burlington, VT 3 months ago

Didn't we have a number of links tracking back to one or more studies that irrefutably demonstrate the . . . Republic . . . is currently ruled by an oligarchy?

And that would, by definition, tend to refute the position that we are ruled by some musical group of unknown origin and long past era?

Should someone tell this fool that the era of the duop has long passed?

[-] -1 points by shooz (17816) 3 months ago

HCHC, is hung up on the word, not the concept.

I fear it would be useless, but you could try.

Never give up trying to educate.

[-] -1 points by ZenDog (13421) from South Burlington, VT 3 months ago

that's why I left the video link - I thought maybe a series of moving pictures might help - but that may yet prove too complicated. I'm not certain but it may be that anything more than a single picture is too much to take in . . .

[-] -2 points by shooz (17816) 3 months ago

Well, he did say he loves Bernie, but I guess he didn't mean Bernie Sanders.

[-] -2 points by ZenDog (13421) from South Burlington, VT 3 months ago

ha! I'm sure you are right. I guess that means he really isn't a liar at all, is he, no matter how extensive, how pervasive, his dishonesty . . .

[Removed]

[+] -4 points by ZenDog (13421) from South Burlington, VT 3 months ago

chew on that fukwad