Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: I expect to +1 "Ex-president Khatami dismisses allegations in IAEA report" in Tehran Times tomorrow 10AM

Posted 12 years ago on Nov. 18, 2011, 6:34 p.m. EST by looseshoelacenj (8)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

You just keep leaving the problem to fester and can't admit it's wrong. In response to your unbelievable mismanagement yesterday I decided to +1 a link here at the Teheran Times under a similar login name.


I am sick of you continuing to cover up a situation which you wrongly believe is only a risk to people you hate and I feel adverse consequences are appropriate. It can still go downhill from here but probably not for as long as you might think. As I let you know last night YOU HAVE ALREADY SURRENDERED until this situation changes greatly.



Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by looseshoelacenj (8) 12 years ago

In an unexpected turn of events I did the +1 at 5AM this morning. I might have been fast asleep but, because of the actions of you jerks and morons on Thursday, I am wide awake now. There was sort of a half decent private answer to this thread but the problem seems bigger than two people. So +1 on Google to "Ex-president Khatami dismisses allegations in IAEA report". I am still waiting on a reasonable, sensible, response and, lacking such an answer, planning to be back later this morning to bump my Google +1 on "IAEA not responsible for overseeing countries’ missile activities: FM" from Tehran Times.

[-] 1 points by looseshoelacenj (8) 12 years ago

Scratch that no further bumps thing. If you are too busy to administer this forum that's your problem at this point. Will continue to promote Iranian Nuclear program on this forum with relevant links that I Google +1 every hour starting tomorrow morning at 10AM until someone on the forum get off their tail and says or does something sensible.

If you want to stay busy smugly writing put-downs for Barkode's posting about putting Jew Bankers in jail you can go right ahead.

[-] 1 points by looseshoelacenj (8) 12 years ago

Someone might consider answering this posting with enough intelligence to persuade me to change my mind.

You probably don't care what happens beyond limiting the damage your mess causes to your image. There will be no further bumps of the posting.

[-] 0 points by alouis (1511) from New York, NY 12 years ago

If your point is that Iran has a right to nuclear research and development, the same as any other nation I agree. What I don't understand, and maybe you can clarify it, is what is the beef here?

[-] 1 points by looseshoelacenj (8) 12 years ago

Thank you again for your open minded response and the OWS tolerance for such open minded ideas, and their attentiveness to such diverse viewpoints as Barkode’s, is noted. The decision to remove Barkode’s flame fest thread is noted as an indication of possibly adequate competency.

There are many people who are concerned that the development of nuclear facilities and technology by Iran may put people at risk if Iran uses such development to acquire nuclear weapons. I barely view that concern as my problem since the many people with such concerns, with plain and adequate warning, could not take the trouble to reply or otherwise act on my thread. While I view their inaction as quite disappointing, I do not find it surprising given my experience with OWS in Manhattan this past Thursday.

Indeed, given my experience on Thursday I expect that given the power they demand, OWS as the new boss doing wealth redistribution would look far too much like the old boss in terms of how it would actually treat people to be worth the disruption. The OWS I met on Thursday appeared too self righteous and hostile to be capable of civil discourse beyond what is offered by “the old boss”. I feel that the weak response to my thread is symptomatic of such attitudes and confirms my negative reaction to the organization that day. I understand being angry with the current system, but without a more positive outlook I feel that it is entirely possible, and even likely, for a simple class based power grab to replace it with something as bad or worse.

[-] 1 points by looseshoelacenj (8) 12 years ago

You know - probably my opinion doesn't matter here. I should probably have kept posting promotions for the Iranian nuclear program until you deleted the thread. It seems to be the appropriate level of discourse here even if it's wrong.

Still thinking through my alternatives ...

[-] 1 points by looseshoelacenj (8) 12 years ago

Sorry I brought up the issue that it might be wrong. My posts to one of your other threads about Zionism and the media remind me that OWS is just another organization about winning. Perhaps in my future conduct here considerations of right and wrong would be better overlooked in favor of the effectiveness of the outcome.

[-] 1 points by looseshoelacenj (8) 12 years ago

Thanks for answering ... will get back a bit later this morning ..