Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: willard's private elevator for the elite - him

Posted 1 year ago on Oct. 15, 2012, 5:54 p.m. EST by ericweiss (575)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Mitt Romney made much of his supposed bipartisan skills in Wednesday night's debate. By this time, it may not surprise you to hear that he was "stretching" the truth.

As a Republican governor whose legislature was 87 percent Democrats, he said, "I figured out from Day 1 I had to get along, and I had to work across the aisle to get anything done." The result, he said, was that "we drove our schools to be No. 1 in the nation. We cut taxes 19 times."

Romney didn't deserve credit for Massachusetts schools that were already great when he became governor, the tax cuts include a number that came from the legislature, "routine extensions of existing tax reductions that were due to expire," and two one-day sales tax holidays. Additionally, Romney was famous for raising fees on basically everything he could think of.

And about that bipartisanship. Massachusetts state legislators, though heavily Democratic, were used to working with Republican governors. But while there were moments Romney worked with them successfully—passing the precursor to Obamacare, for instance—Massachusetts legislators by and large remember him as exactly the entitled jerk we see running for president now. One frequently cited example of that entitlement is the elevator in the State House that Romney reserved for himself, banning state legislators from using it. They also talk about the security ropes he had installed outside his office. And about how it was impossible to get a meeting with him and he didn't bother to learn the names of the legislators who he now tells us he worked so hard to get bipartisan with.

It's not just legislators, either. Romney also kept his distance from the state's mayors:

John Barrett, who was mayor of the city of North Adams during Romney's governorship, described him Thursday as "a governor who just ignored us, who didn't want our effort," saying he never met with mayors or sought their input. "He believed that a PowerPoint presentation would solve all our problems," Barrett said.

One Democratic mayor did have a positive experience with Romney. But:

When Kalisz relayed the story to his fellow mayors, though, a funny thing happened: Nobody believed him. “They thought I was joking when I said he was physically in my office,” Kalisz says.

Taking a shared elevator and keeping it for himself, security ropes, refusing to meet with legislators and mayors. Sound like bipartisanship to you? And that was in a state mostly controlled by Democrats—Romney wouldn't face nearly the same pressure to work with Democrats when it comes to a sharply divided U.S. Congress. The meetings with Democrats that he claims would happen on Day One would be much more likely to happen on Day Never.

5 Comments

5 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by bensdad (8977) 1 year ago

corporations are people

[-] 1 points by Tanakasan (-7) 1 year ago

Well he will be a lot more bi-partisan than Obama. We have already seen his approach. His healthcare bill got nary a vote from the opposition party.

[-] 2 points by ericweiss (575) 1 year ago

bi-partisan !?!?!?
As governor, he used the veto 800 times
and was overridden 700 times


how many times has Obama been on "R" fox ?
how many times has willard been on "D" MSNBC ?


bipartisan: With five Republicans joining Democrats in opposition, the Senate easily rejected a House-passed budget plan Wednesday calling for deep cuts in domestic appropriations and major restructuring of Medicare, the government-backed healthcare program for the elderly.

The 57-40 roll call proved more for show than substance but still stung for GOP leaders, coming less than 24 hours after the same Medicare issue figured prominently in the upset of a Republican candidate in a special House election in a conservative upstate New York district.

[-] 1 points by Tanakasan (-7) 1 year ago

But Romney got Democratic votes for his largest and most controversial issue. If Obama is elected there will be stalemate.

[-] 1 points by ericweiss (575) 1 year ago

do you prefer stalemate? or surrender to the 1%