Forum Post: willard lied & obfuscated & Obama let him get away with it
Posted 12 years ago on Oct. 3, 2012, 10:53 p.m. EST by bensdad
(8977)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Obama should have used 47% Obama never mentioned womens rights Obama never mentioned rayans budget
YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY ?
When Romney said he wanted to "broaden the base" Obama should have been ready to point out that means more working people paying taxes, and "lower the rates" that means so he can give billionaires a tax break, would it have really been so hard to say, "He wants to lower the rates by 5 trillion and says he will pay for it by closing loopholes, but we can't find'em and he won't tell us what they are."
msnbac poll of 500 uncommitted voters: 46% romney 22% Obama
[Removed]
I could agree with you on the 47% - but there were so many other missed opportunities.
"we added 30 moths of private sector jobs" etc etc etc
sadly, jim lehrer was a useless stooge
hopefully, the next three debates will not be like this
........................................................................................A T T A C K !!!
Biden will !!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://occupywallst.org/forum/the-1st-presidential-debate-fail-fail-people-i-tru/#comment-848467
O: professorial, sincere, honest, almost no attacks
R: mild attacks, lies, obfuscation
who won?
my guess is that it depends on how you value honesty and if you think Obama should have attacked & used the 47% & expanded debate into willards weaknesses such as trickle down bs & republiclan obstrutionism Why didn't he ask willard - "You endorsed paul ryans budget - do you still?"
Who won? WHO WON?!!
I can tell you who lost. The same person who loses regardless, every single fuckin election- the American. The American ALWAYS loses in this bullshit.
Because he's down with the same shit, just different methods. The establishment doesnt want these two going into details, because its going to either A) scare the shit out of the entire nation or B)expose them as the bumbling, lying idiots they are.