Forum Post: Why not Occupy the North Pole??
Posted 12 years ago on Dec. 25, 2011, 12:29 a.m. EST by necropaulis
(491)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
I'm mean Santa has to be the 1% of the 1%, right??
Cause Santa's a mean son of a bitch. His army may be short, but it ain't small. You just don't fuck with the man.
Too cold. Burrr
Do you mean North Pole, Alaska, a little town near Fairbanks that the 800 mile, 33 year old Trans-Alaskan Pipeline runs through? Considering Alyeska's (the owner of the pipeline) less than stellar reputation for being candid about past leaks and spills, I think that Occupying North Pole, AK is a great idea. The other consideration of course is the fact that BP owns 46% of Alyeska Pipeline Services. You remember them folks from the Gulf oil spill, don't you?!
I think it might be best though to Occupy only in the summer months. You still have to worry about the mosquitoes, moose, and especially the grizzlies, but at least you won't have to freeze your butt off in temperatures that can reach minus 50 degrees F.
Do your history... really, you can youtube this one, as in: "The history of Saint Nicholas."
Santa is not St. Nick. I know the difference
YouTube is not a source of information. A book is. If I wanted info about something popular, I would at least go to Wikipedia.
It's a joke. Y'know, because he can manage to pump out all those toys, afford reindeer, sled upkeep, buy a a bunch of Coke-though they may be endorsing him, hmm-, and pay a bunch of cronies worldwide to impersonate him.
It's fucking Christmas, lighten up ;)
Do your fucking history...