Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Why No Sympathy for the Palestinians? The Disgusting Attacks on Gunter Grass

Posted 2 years ago on April 10, 2012, 7:04 p.m. EST by ShubeLMorgan2 (1088) from New York, NY
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

by TARIQ ALI The German writer Gunter Grass (The Tin Drum) had already predicted the response to his poem in SdZ. There is no reason to be surprised, but there is every reason to be disgusted. Within Germany both the elite and a layer of the population by their words and actions appear to have accepted the disgraceful Goldhagen thesis whereby all German were guilty for the crimes of the Third Reich. This thesis has now been developed further: all Germans are guilty for eternity for the crimes of the Third Reich.

Behind this thinking is the Zionist and Zionophile argument that the crime against the Jews of Europe was unique in the annals of history. This was true as far as the method of extermination was concerned, but not in any other way. The Belgians massacred the Congolese in greater numbers: over 10 million according to the historian Adam Hochschild. The killing of Armenians during the First World War was systematic and we could go on and discuss the nuking of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but comparing one massacre or genocide to another is a futile exercise. Raul Hilberg the most authoritative historian of the Judeocide was angered by the uses that were being made of that crime today.

Some members of the extreme-right government and Lieberman in particular, that rules Israel today have used proto-fascist language against the Palestinian Arabs. Are we not allowed to point that out? That the Israeli government pushed the Bush administration to make war on Iraq is hardly a secret. Nor is the statement of the Israeli Ambassador to the US the day after the fall of Baghdad: “Don’t stop. Move on to Damascus and Teheran.’ Are we not allowed to rebuke him? The targeting and killing of young Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere is fine, is it?

Gunter Grass was very mild in his criticisms. He concentrated on Israeli warmongering in relation to Iran. He could have said a lot more. The fact that it needs political courage to say even what he did in Germany or France is a sad reflection on the political culture of both these countries. As for the attacks on Grass for his wartime activities, these are beneath contempt. The Israelis were delighted when the former Italian minister, Gianfranco Fini, whose party is in lineal descent from Mussolini, went to Israel and praised the Wall. He was forgiven his party’s past. So the past only matters if a person is critical of Israel. The former Nazis in various positions in the postwar Federal republic who pushed through reparations and backed Israel, they were never criticized either.

German citizens should ponder the following: it was not the Palestinians who were responsible for the murder of millions of Jews during the Second World War. Yet they, the Palestinians, have become the indirect victims of the Judeocide. Those to whom evil is done, do evil in return to others. So why no sympathy for the Palestinians?

Tariq Ali is the author of The Duel: Pakistan on the Flightpath of American Power. He can be reached at tariq.ali3@btinternet.com.

http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/04/10/the-disgusting-attacks-on-gunter-grass/

2 Comments

2 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by trashyharry (1498) from Waterville, NY 2 years ago

There is no hope at all for the cause of the Zionists.If anyone thinks they might still prevail I will refer them to the several videos available on the internets which show the IDF running over Jews with bulldozers and shooting Jews in the head with automatic weapons.For Zionists who kill Jews there is no reason to exist...atb trashy

[-] 0 points by fiftyfourforty (1077) from New York, NY 2 years ago

different kinds of zionists? different kinds of thieves? (ok. thief of land. thief of water. thief of air. thief of personal property.etc) a zionist is a zionist. none of the one have a right to palestine.

chompsky is a thief at heart. a supporter, albeit at times a critical supporter, of thieves. and a deceiver.

2 A blogger from Lebanon March 12, 2009 at 6:08 pm

I am very critical of Chomsky on his take on Palestine. He is utterly unconvincing. I remember sitting through one of his guest talks in Canada, and hearing him justify zionist theft (of 1948 lands) and the violation of the right of refugees to return to their lands, by saying it wasn't within the boundaries of reason to expect, let alone demand, that these lands come under the sovereignty of the indigenous people from whom it was stolen. Gee. Go tell that to the black South Africans suffering under, and dispossessed by, racist colonial rule? As usual, different standards when it comes to South Africa (and the rest of the world, actually) on the one hand, and Israel on the other hand. Yes, even Chomsky does it.

3 Dan Kelly March 12, 2009 at 7:40 pm

Great post, ABFH. Chomsky's self-narrative on his upbringing and his experience with "labor Zionism" in the early days, pre-Israel, is thoroughly unconvincing to me as well.

I remember reading what he wrote about the early days of "Israel".

He said he spent a short time there, and although he loved the kibbutz he worked on, he felt a certain racism taking hold back then – the Palestinians were looked at as lesser people, even by the "progressive" labor Zionists of which he was a part.

He takes pains to say that he (and evidently, according to him, the other "labor Zionists" as well) was always against the formation of a strictly Jewish state. Yet, he says that once the state was established (which he evidently didn't do much to oppose either), it should be recognized as any other, according to international law. And then he's done with it. That's it.

This always struck me as a rather odd stance to take for a self-declared "anarchist" who speaks eloquently against nation states and in favor of indigenous rights.

Chomsky, whether intentionally or unwittingly, has a severe blind spot for Israel. He makes an exception of it all the time. It's much more subtle than the obvious Israeli-centric mindset we're used to from mainstream Zionists, but it's there.

http://mondoweiss.net/2009/03/i-was-wrong-about-chomsky.html