Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: When did the TSA and their rectal exams come into existence?

Posted 12 years ago on Dec. 29, 2011, 4:48 p.m. EST by mee44 (71)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

I forget..... oh yea, that would be under the Barackster's regime! Gitmo still open. Rendition still in force. THREE years and they still can't decide where to try Kalid Sheik Mohammed for planning 9/11. THREE years? Really folks? Helloooooooooo?

Foreclosures at an all time high. Unemployment well above the "official" lying bureau of labor statistic's 8.6 percent. But I thought it would never get over 8% if we just gave donkeys more of our tax $$$ to give to ACORN & Company? Or so the teleprompter said.

A wasted Barack Obama Recovery Act (stimulus) that was enough dollars to pay off 90% of all residential mortgages. Well... I'm still paying my mortgage. What happened? At least Nancy Pelosi spent that money wisely studying the harvest mouse in her district. (rolleyes)

Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, Fannie, Freddie, the Post Orifice and federal pensions all broke! A debt of $48,000 for every person in the United States thanks to Uncle Sham wasting it on handouts to freeloaders.

But hey, at least time was wisely spent banning light bulbs, giving half a billion to Solyndra under the table, and telling you how much water your toilet will be allowed to hold and to inflate your tires to solve a gas crisis. BTW, the White House's own Jeff Immelt, HMFIC at General Electric sure is bringing good things to life...of the Chinese!

Howzat Hope & Change working out?


Heal baby heal !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by superomenna1 (89) 12 years ago

The neocons, the Israel lobby and big oil are keeping American troops in the Middle East for their own greedy reasons and the US population pays the price by having TSA gloved fingers probing butts. Harvard Professor Stephen Walt and U of Chicago Professor John Mearsheimer discuss the subject at MIT on the video below.


[-] 0 points by owsass (-36) 12 years ago

TSA are 100% Obama. Obama authorized the TSA to do the cavity searches in order to humilitate the people. This was required because the people didn't want to be x-ray'd with the new machines that allow TSA men to see women nude.

The TSA actually enjoys fondling the genitals of infants and sticking their fingers up peoples rectums, thus its a win-win for Obama & TSA.

What's interesting here is this thread acts like none of this is happening, that the TSA isn't doing rectal exams even though they're not physicians, that they're NOT touching infants and small children in ways that would send 'little people' to prison for life.

This is all about humiliation, and it would have NEVER allowed to have been authorized by a rePUGlican, it took a DEMocrat to make this violation possible.

TSA are 100% Obama.

[-] 1 points by superomenna1 (89) 12 years ago

Now with the war with Iran, is unlikely this nightmare will end any time soon.

[-] 1 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 12 years ago

If Bush had still been in power THEY (the powers that be) would never have gotten so much. But with "Democrat" nice guy, great voice Obama in "power", the opposition was outflanked.


[-] 0 points by mee44 (71) 12 years ago

Try again dipschit. The raw data from the IRS is right there:


and in chart form right there:



[-] 1 points by InspectorGadget (-50) 12 years ago

Google Image Search "My First Cavity Search"


[-] 0 points by IslandActivist (191) from Keaau, HI 12 years ago

I'm just going to attempt to answer the thread title since the rest is incoherent. After the 9/11 attack Bush's party urged for an establishment of the Department of Homeland Security. This is where the Patriot Act and TSA originated from.

[-] 0 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

No, the PATRIOT Act was already written before 9/11. This whole police state institution was already planned. Alex Jones gets some of the details wrong, and can be downright paranoid and delusional at times, but in the big picture, he's nailed a lot of things on the head. He saw this coming.

This was broadcast the same day the WTC was privatized, July 25, 2001 He said that a false flag terrorist attack was imminent, and even predicted that bin Laden would be blamed for it.


[-] 0 points by IslandActivist (191) from Keaau, HI 12 years ago

October 26, 2001? That's when it became law.

[-] 0 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

The Patriot act is an extensive document. There is no way it was crafted in just over a month.


If you read the pre-9/11 writings of the people involved, and look at their post-9/11 actions, you will see clearly that this is all part of a bigger plan to destroy the Constitution of the United States of America. These people do not believe in America. They see it as a myth, a collective delusion to be molded and manipulated through acts of physical and economic terrorism in conjunction with the control of the flow of information.

One might even suspect that they read Orwell, not as a warning, but as a playbook. OTOH, it may be that Orwell was writing about these very institutions in a previous generation.

[-] 1 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 12 years ago

So was Orwell writing his books as warnings or as playbooks?

[-] 1 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

He was publishing someone's playbooks. That's my guess. He had been an intelligence officer in the office of propaganda for the UK during WWII. I'm sure he knew a thing or two.

[-] 0 points by valfather (286) 12 years ago

TSA is a post 9/11 monster just like the DHS. Blow the lid off of 9/11 and much else will correct itself. 9/11 was an inside job!

[-] 0 points by fucorporatemedia (451) 12 years ago

Look, Obama stinks but...

Bush started the BIG GOVERNMENT TSA and the new Department of Homeland Security.

BIG GOVERNMENT by definition.

These BIG GOVERNMENT programs have cost this US more money than all the social programs that you uninformed useful idiots keep complaining about.

Social Security has a HUGE SURPLUS thanks to Reagan (yes Reagan) increasing the contributions into the fund to account for the baby boomers.

It was so well funded that they stole the money for wars and tax cuts and now they don't want to pay it back.

Social Security is separately and fully funded. The government never should have borrowed the money, now they will have to take some of the money they handed out in tax cuts back, to PAY THE PEOPLE BACK for the money that the US CONGRESS and the people that demanded tax cuts STOLE FROM THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

Bush wasted Trillions on war in Iraq, Rumsfeld announced on Sept 10, 2001 that the pentagon 'lost' 2.3 Trillion, the corporate media is pushing yet another war in Iran....but you assholes keep blaming the victims.

Solyndra Solyndra Solyndra, do you know how many war profiteers ripped of the US, including the company of the VP under Bush....all went unnoticed by the supposed 'liberal' media.

Wake up!


[-] -1 points by betuadollar (-313) 12 years ago

Yea but Obama has had every opportunity to make corrections to TSA and he has refused to do so. HE is the guilty party here.

[-] -2 points by mee44 (71) 12 years ago

FDR designed social security to be part of the general fund from DAY ONE.


LBJ proposed Medicare funding be part of the general fund in 1964 and it was signed into law in 1965 after a vote by a democrat congress (aka the "great society" BS).

Carter expanded Social Insecurity to include disability in the Social Security Disability Amendment of 1980.

Barack Obama raided Medicare to the tune of $500 Billion to fund ObamaCare in 2010. Now he's defunding both medicare and social security by playing the FICA tax against the payroll tax holiday shell game.

The programs are BROKE: www.usdebtclock.org

Yes donkey, wake up.

[-] 0 points by fucorporatemedia (451) 12 years ago

Social Security is separately funded with FICA taxes.

The Social Security trust fund is running a surplus, so much so the crooks and liars in Congress couldn't keep their hands off of it.

They paid for wars we could not afford, BIG GOVERNMENT TSA and Homeland Security we could not afford, gave out tax cuts while increasing Big Government Spending...that obviously we could not afford...

...and now you all want to blame social security because it had so much money you couldn't help but steal it for your selfish tax cuts and murderous plans?

[-] -1 points by mee44 (71) 12 years ago

They didn't "give out taxcuts". You act like everything you earn belongs to the gubment and by virtue of its kindness, Uncle Sham ALLOWS people to keep some of it. BS.

The wars are paid for. Welfare isn't.

When Franklin Roosevelt campaigned for the law, he routinely claimed that Social Security was system of insurance that would provide a pension income to the elderly. It wasn't until the 1937 Supreme Court case Helverling v. Davis where the same administration argued that Social Security taxes were not insurance premiums at all, but a generic tax to be spent as government saw fit. But the deception didn't stop there. To the present day, statements on the policy come regularly to the program's participants, perpetuating the illusion of a traditional retirement plan.


[-] 1 points by fucorporatemedia (451) 12 years ago

The wars are paid for by????

Who pays for the war in your little bubble where you want to pay no taxes?

Who pays for your TSA and Big Government Department of Homeland Secuirty?

Who is going to pay Blackwater to stay in Iraq for Eternity? Who paid for Cheney's Halliburton and their cost plus ripoff contracts in Iraq? Who is going to pay for Iran?

You entitled people want it all, your wars, your illegal violations of our constitution, groping our grannies at the airport...and you don't want to pay for it.

That is what it comes down to.

So you all got everything you wanted, by stealing it from American's retirements they have been paying into their whole lives.

They gave tax cuts, while pilfering from Social Security.

What part of this aren't you getting?

[-] 0 points by mee44 (71) 12 years ago

By federal income taxes that the 50% actually pay.

Section 8, Powers of Congress

"To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

To provide and maintain a Navy;

To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces;

To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;"

[-] 1 points by fucorporatemedia (451) 12 years ago

To pay for propagandists to lie and attack nations based on forged and faulty evidence to benefit oil corporations and war profiteers.

And you are okay paying for that 2.3 trillion that went missing? Rumsfeld 2.3 Trillion Dollars missing Pentagon 1 DAY before 911 www.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D3kpWqdPMjmo&ei=W_r8TouQCOnbiAKKluHLDg&usg=AFQjCNFYm9qoWDJYmcpCcLcFhzUVWpgYKQ&cad=rja

[-] -2 points by mee44 (71) 12 years ago

It is NOT SEPARATELY FUNDED. What part of that don't you get?

Read the statute. It's part of the General Fund.

I didn't make the rules up. I'm just citing them to you FFS.

[-] 0 points by fucorporatemedia (451) 12 years ago

What are FICA taxes?

What is income tax?

You make up the lies.

[-] -1 points by mee44 (71) 12 years ago

FICA is a payroll tax that goes into the GENERAL FUND to fund anything the gubment sees fit. There are no separate social insecurity or mediscare accounts. They are fungible. Get it now?

[-] 0 points by fucorporatemedia (451) 12 years ago

Why are their two taxes?

Why does the right wing keep saying the poor pay no taxes when everyone is paying FICA?

Why do the rich get a cap on FICA?

[-] -1 points by mee44 (71) 12 years ago

There are two taxes because Uncle Sham wants the illusion that they put the money aside for you to retire on. They don't.

Because when you count all the deductions and loopholes, like the earned income tax credit, child credit, standard deductions and exemptions, half the country pays no taxes. It's a fact whether you like it or not.

The rich? Someone making $106,000 a year isn't "rich".

[-] -1 points by Kirby (104) 12 years ago

Not very good Mee. An awful lot of people are sad hearted and blue under this administration.

[-] -1 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 12 years ago

"Heal baby heal !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

I'm assuming your rectal exam left irreparable scars.

[-] -1 points by mee44 (71) 12 years ago

Bottom line, it's time to flush democrats en masse.

[-] 0 points by nth (21) 12 years ago

Time to flush you Both down!!!

Fuck all Repugs and demoncrats!!


[-] 0 points by owsass (-36) 12 years ago

Why is it when you say this you don't get banned? But when I say what you just said I get banned?


[-] 1 points by InspectorGadget (-50) 12 years ago

no. these chat moderators are fucking idiots. i had some fool in chat talk trash to me two days in a row for no reason. and then when i finally stood up to him some moderator took his side and banned me. this shithead websit is outta control and has no real direction. i have called the phone numbers on here for days trying to do something about it all but nobody answers or does anything when i leave messages. OWSASS is correct.

[-] 1 points by owsass (-36) 12 years ago

I'm in Brisbane, I'm an aussie, I'm rooting for my mates.

I'm just pointing out when I used the exact same words as you I got deleted, and had my account suspended for saying that Obama & Bush are the same and owned by the same.


[-] 1 points by owsass (-36) 12 years ago

I think its important to fight these assholes. I have been around this shit for 50+ years. I know their game, I know what they're afraid of, and I never get tired.

If you look at this forum, like nobody stands up to their shit, I'm NOT anti-OWS per-se, I'm a real anarchist. I just want them to represent 'little-people' and not the status quo, but like the below say's ... they don't represent HOPE&CHANGE anymore than does OBAMA, ...


COINTELPRO fake protests partner with MEDIA to distract from real protests. I believe the Greek protest is genuine. OCCUPY WALL STREET was timed to drown out the Greeks.

I think this because the Greeks had a specific demand last month in direct response to their government's sellout to the IMF. The Greek protest was saying 'Don't vote to accept this debt, traitors!'The "Occupy Wall Street" type protest is NON SPECIFIC.

CONINTELPRO handled protests don't make demands - they make 'statements'. Like, "STOP WAR! LEGALIZE POT! "Give us back our future!" and "Stop pollution!"

OCCUPY TOGETHER in the US and Canada are directed by C.A.N.V.AS., the same directors behind the Tunisian and Egyptian and 'Arab Spring' revolutions. They may look the same but the objectives are quite different. The objective in America and Canada is NOT to topple 'regimes'. C.A.N.V.AS. is backed by Council on Foreign Relations foundations like Carnegie Group and the Albert Einstein Institute and myriad other funnels of BUSH-CHENEY funding.


[-] 1 points by owsass (-36) 12 years ago

Yep, and if you google owsleader2012 & owsleader2011 you'll see I wrote a ton of hard stuff on cia fbi cointelpro and OWS removed 100% of the material, ... its ok

But you got to figure why they delete stuff that is ONLY history, .. is that part of the 'rules' too Thrassy? History not allowed?

COINTELPRO never existed?

I know I saw the other day you got bashed because you pointed out the truth, that american people are idiots and entire world sees them as such,

My first post when I started here in OCT as GOLUM was that "OWS wasn't worth the fight, that the current USA wasn't worth saving", ... that got deleted and quick. These people here at OWS don't want to know what the world outside of the USA prison thinks about the old penal colony.

But now I know that OWS only exists to re-elect OBAMA 2012, and thus everything else is a joke, and pointing out that OBAMA 2012 is the goal will get you deleted in a nano-second, now why is that illegal? Is that statement also banned on the rules thrassy? ( I keep asking the question, cuz thrassy is the mod ).


[-] 1 points by owsass (-36) 12 years ago

Dude, that's why I live on the beach here in aussie-land in a tree house near byron, been here for years, ... bailed out and dropped out as far from the FUCKING usa as possible