Forum Post: War-Bomba on a Mad Rampage
Posted 12 years ago on Dec. 4, 2011, 12:25 p.m. EST by hchc
(3297)
from Tampa, FL
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
Is this guy insane? Now the Iranians have shot down a drone plane. We are going to keep poking them, until the eventually bite, and then we can finally blow them up.
What a disgrace our country has become. More wars, more robbing of the people through taxation and printing, and more corruption.
Obama has to go. Democrats have to go. Republicans have to go. Replace with normal, hard working Americans.
Before the death tolls reaches new heights.
BO is just another tool of the corproate-military-financial complex.
Time for a nationwide general strike - shut down the whole country.
Baracks Obombya
Just focus on WallSt, they are the masters of bipartisan politicians.
You can't be a better politician within the system because these mights occupy the state.
[Removed]
Yeah, a mullah nuclear bomb would be better for peace.
Please read http://thecloverhelix.blogspot.com/2011/11/historical-example-of-blowback-america.html and report back.
That doesn't make a mullah nuclear bomb a good idea for peace and that's where things are headed.
How about peace being a good idea for peace?
Maybe you should tell them that instead.
They are not the aggressors.
Sure, we are. Of course, I forget the liberal mindset. Well, good thing then when the mullahs get the bomb to protect themselves from us. The world will be a better place and peace will be at hand.
The application of labels and appeals to emotion are a poor substitute for facts and the application of reason.
Peace will be at hand when people act peacefully. I cannot remember the last time Iran attacked another nation. The last time Iran was at war, it was because they were invaded by Iraq. Iran has no military bases on foreign soil. Iran does not involve itself in overthrowing foreign governments for the benefit of the world's power-mongering controllers. Considering everything that the UK and USA have done to them, their response has been quite measured; I would in fact call it peaceful.
The main reason for US saber-rattling with Iran is because of oil and the fact that the worldwide banking cartel does not yet control the Iranian central bank.
I was taught to do the right thing, regardless of imagined negative consequences (which rarely bear any resemblance to reality). Wouldn't you rather risk your life to do the right thing than to live knowing you had no integrity? I hear a tremendous amount of fear in your responses, the seeds of which were likely planted by the media (who are owned by the same people who want control of the Iranian oil and monetary system). Don't allow yourself to manipulated so easily.
Yes, Iran represents peace, we represent aggression. The only thing we have to fear is dopey pacifism like yours that would have us sit here with flowers up our asses until threats like Iran fully mature into major conflicts.
Did Iran invade someone lately? I musta missed that. I don't know about you but I'm real worried about one of those Iranian troop transports sailing across the ocean and performing a mainland invasion... come on, it would take them a year to secure every building in New York.
Live and let live.
PS. You know what does worry me? The fact that as a result of American actions Russia is sending troops to park off the coast of Syria, and power up its defensive capabilities. China also appears to be less than impressed with American bases inching closer to its borders...
Heh, I already acknowledged that an Iranian nuke would help bring peace to the world. LOL. Live and let live. That's exactly what the mullahs have in mind. Ask the Israelis, they'll tell you.
They probably would have a lot to say about it, they have a whole bunch of nukes.
Hopefully they would figure out like India and Pakistan, and the USA and USSR that mutually assured destruction is not cool. If not, I guess we wouldn't have to worry about either of them anymore. But that is their choice.
Also: Are Muslims really going to nuke one of their traditional holy sites?
Lets start from the very beginning:
When in life is the application of force warranted?
For self-defense. And if you say that you have no idea that you're in a situation of self-defense until I pull the trigger, you're just stupid.
Correct!
How does one determine who is defending themselves?
Sure, I see. They're defending themselves against us, so it's OK whatever they might do to us. If they take a swing, we should just be more understanding. LOL.
I ask the question once again, how does one determine who is defending themselves? Can I ask you to please answer without sarcasm (it doesn't add anything to the discussion).
But that is an answer. I jumped ahead a little as your approach was so obvious.
You don't, because it doesn't matter. A mullah bomb remains a bad idea for peace and a bad idea for our security. That's what we act on.
Vote Libertarian.
libertarians are just repelicans on the fringe.
That is PERFECT..... Ditch the "religious values" forced upon people, and stay out of their business.
You liberal party is pretty libertarian when it comes to some things. Where do you think the word came from?
I have not researched its entomology, but I note that most libertarians are in favor of complete deregulation - and deregulation is how we got here.
Anyone who goes far enough to the left suddenly and unaccountably finds themselves lost among the neo-con-artists - fools and nimrods who in their folly have run this ship of state upon the shoals . . . .
Neolibs and neocons are one in the same, one wants your economic freedom, the other your personal freedom.
Do some research on it. Deregulation of business, but also deregulation of you too. Drug laws, immigration laws, gay rights, pointless fines, controlling what your kids are taught, etc.
Fact is, they dont really fit into the L vs R paradigm that generations have been brainwashed into. Which is why its so hard to comprehend.
Without fiat money, fractional reserve banking and legal tender laws, none of the current mess would be possible. It was government regulation that forced fiat money, fractional reserve banking and legal tender laws on us.
and deregulation of the media and banking
Without fiat money, fractional reserve banking and legal tender laws, no regulation of banking would be required.
The only problem with the media is the fact that it's been monopolized. Monopolies are not possible without government collusion. In fact, most of big business would not be possible at the current scale without government collusion (there's a great book called "Imperial San Francsico", which handily illustrates this point from a historical perspective).
Asking the same government who created this mess through regulation to fix it through regulation sounds fairly absurd to me. Unlike an abusive spouse, they have not even come begging for us to take them back, claiming to have "changed their ways".