Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: US Senate To Vote On Bill That Will Allow The Military To Arrest Americans

Posted 12 years ago on Nov. 28, 2011, 7:17 a.m. EST by magnuvium (0) from Muncie, IN
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

US Senate To Vote On Bill That Will Allow The Military To Arrest Americans On American Soil And Hold Them Indefinitely!

Since Occupy Wall Street began, American police officers have arrested thousands of people for exercising their constitutionally protected right to protest. On Monday or Tuesday, the US Senate will vote on a bill that would give the President the ability to order the military to arrest and imprison American citizens anywhere in the world for an indefinite period of time.

A provision of S. 1867, or the National Defense Authorization Act bill, written by Senators John McCain and Carl Levin, declares American soil a battlefield and allows the President and all future Chief Executives to order the military to arrest and detain American citizens, innocent or not, without charge or trial. In other words, if this bill passes and the President signs it, OWS protesters or any American could end up arrested and indefinitely locked up by the military without the guaranteed right to due process or a speedy trial.

This bill was written in secret and approved by committee without a single hearing. Senate Republicans support the bill and enough Democrats support it to give it a great chance of passing. This provision does have opponents. President Obama has threatened to veto the bill and even Ron Lawl is concerned enough to bring it up during one of the GOP debates. An amendment called the Udall Amendment has been offered by Democratic Senator Mark Udall that would delete the dangerous provision.

If you are an American citizen, protect your constitutional rights. Call your senator and tell them to approve of the Udall Amendment. No American citizen should be arrested by the military and held indefinitely without charge or trial. It’s not conducive to American values and would give the military and the government more power over the American citizenry. The last time Americans had to deal with an overreaching military was during the Revolutionary era. Because of that, the Founders included the 3rd Amendment to ban the quartering of troops during times of war and peace. Once again, Americans are under threat of dealing with a military that has more power than it should have. And it could cost us most of the freedoms we tend to take for granted

America is NOT a battlefield. America is a free country and American citizens should not ever be arrested by the military and certainly not without being charged or getting a trial. This provision would cast aside the Constitution and put the liberties of American citizens here at home and around the world at serious risk. Please call your senator or visit this link, because this is a risk Americans cannot afford to take.

4 Comments

4 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by PublicCurrency (1387) 12 years ago

Call your Senators . . urgent . . .

The Defense Authorization bill — a “must-pass” piece of legislation — is headed to the Senate floor with troubling provisions that would give the President — and all future presidents — the authority to indefinitely imprison people, without charge or trial, both abroad and inside the United States.

If enacted, sections 1031 and 1032 of the NDAA would:

1) Explicitly authorize the federal government to indefinitely imprison without charge or trial American citizens and others picked up inside and outside the United States;

(2) Mandate military detention of some civilians who would otherwise be outside of military control, including civilians picked up within the United States itself; and

(3) Transfer to the Department of Defense core prosecutorial, investigative, law enforcement, penal, and custodial authority and responsibility now held by the Department of Justice.

The bill was drafted in secret by Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) and passed in a closed-door committee meeting, without even a single hearing.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27907

[-] 1 points by dingy58 (172) 12 years ago

Go read the bill, it is NOT bunk. You have to read the entire bill it takes time. Google Udall amendment.

[-] 1 points by beamerbikeclub (414) 12 years ago

This Cannot be true, real, accurate. Completely unconstitutional. But if it is, that's what we get when we allow such things to happen to OTHER people. Guantanamo and Abu Grahib and all kinds of black sites in the name of security. Congratulations, our "security" is coming home for us!

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by Tinhorn (285) 12 years ago

This was posted and debunked a week ago. Do your homework before you post crap to get the "I told you so" fear mongering going. There are already laws in place that remove any jurisdiction of the military to do any such thing on U.S. soil. Additionally, laws already exist that give U.S. law enforcment the ability to do this. There are two cases that I am aware of where a U.S. Citizen has been arrested in the U.S. and are both being held as enemy combatants. The oldest one I am aware of has been held since 2003 with out trial. Bottom line, your statement isn't true.