Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: US Labor Movement at the Crossroads, in the Crosshairs by Shamus Cooke

Posted 2 years ago on June 10, 2012, 5:41 p.m. EST by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

The labor movement had better do some deep soul searching, and fast. Although the defeat in Wisconsin is the horrible end to a local drama, the corporate winners hope to turn their victory into the beginning chapter of a national novel. Firefigher Brian Ritter of Ocean Shores, Wash., holds a pro-union sign during a rally supporting Wisconsin public sector unions on the Capitol campus in Olympia, Washingon in March of 2011. (AP file)

The opening sentence was perhaps written recently in San Diego or San Jose, where voters in both California cities agreed to cut union pensions to resolve budget deficits, an idea soon to catch wildfire nationally.

There can be no mistaking the dire consequence of these events; the anti-union forces are not merely celebrating a tremendous victory, but organizing for new ones. Unless the labor movement educates and re-organizes its forces quickly, the recent losses will serve as a catalyst for union busting on a national scale, unseen in modern times. As the recession lumbers on - and likely intensifies - the wealthy will continue to shift all blame, away from themselves, towards unions that will be targeted for destruction.

"Upcoming battles will test just how far the economy will force unions to bend. New Hampshire will probably face a right-to-work measure when its Democratic governor steps down; Iowa is looking to require state workers to pay more on their health insurance premiums; Pennsylvania legislators plan to substitute 401(k)s for defined benefit plans for state employees."

The complete list of upcoming anti-union legislation nationwide would probably cover all fifty states.

The nation's anti-union environment was already at a fever pitch. President Obama has, contrary to expectations, served over the most anti-union political climate since Ronald Reagan. The President of the nation's largest teachers’ union, Dennis Van Roekel, summarized teachers’ experience with the Obama Administration:

“Today our members face the most anti-educator, anti-union, anti-student environment I have ever experienced.” He was referring, in part, to Obama's anti-union Race to the Top education program and his promotion of charter schools.

Many within the union movement wrongly blame Republicans exclusively for labor's plight. But no fewer than eleven Democratic governors in the past two years have targeted and attacked the public sector unions in their states, blaming labor for the budget deficits caused by the recession, itself caused by the banks and corporations. More than 600,000 public sector jobs have been lost since 2009, many of them union jobs. The re-emerging recession will re-impose this budget deficit challenge for unions for years to come. Will unions learn from their mistakes?

Instead of alerting workers to the new anti-union actions of the Democrats, union officials have miseducated their members by focusing rage solely on the Republican governors of Wisconsin, Ohio, Indiana, etc. As bad as these governors are, they don't exist in a political vacuum. The Republicans have been given new life by the new anti-labor attitude of the Democrats; instead of mounting a vigorous defense of these Republican-targeted unions, Democrats have also been busy steamrolling unions across the country, while cynically pretending to "respect collective bargaining rights" at the same time.

More than 600,000 public sector jobs have been lost since 2009, many of them union jobs. The re-emerging recession will re-impose this budget deficit challenge for unions for years to come. Will unions learn from their mistakes?

In order to maintain their friendship with the union-attacking Democrats, labor leaders made an artificial, suicidal distinction between fighting to maintain bargaining rights (against Republican attackers) and accepting massive concessions demanded by Democratic attackers.

But these twin attacks on unions are two sides of the same coin: accepting concessions without a fight drastically weakens unions, enough to be vulnerable to losing bargaining rights. It was Republicans who demanded concessions today; it will be Democrats who attack bargaining rights tomorrow. Indeed, Democratic politicians in New Jersey have already worked with the Republican governor to strip public employees of collective bargaining rights, a stark reminder that labor unions have no political party of their own.

Nothing has weakened labor so much as its now-common attitude to accepting concessions to wages and benefits. Doing so makes union members think that their union is weak, since it's acting so, while non-union members are given the same impression. Who would want to join a union if they thought their wages and benefits would be reduced? What good are bargaining rights if they are used to lower wages and benefits?

Forty years ago it would be unthinkable to target bargaining rights, since unions were militant organizations that struck fear in the hearts of the corporate elite; it would have also been unthinkable to demand the concessions being demanded today.

But over the years labor became more bark than bite: when Democrats started demanding concessions labor simply rolled over and exposed its belly, instead of roaring back and tearing at its attackers. Union members don't mind paying dues when the money goes to an attack dog instead of a Chihuahua.

It was the attack dog that inspired the movement in Wisconsin. Non-union workers joined the movement in huge numbers because they saw a real fight-back, not just against a Republican Governor, but against the decades-long, anti-worker status quo; they were inspired by working people acting independently and powerfully. Alas, this independence and power was stupidly funneled into the electoral realm, placed in the hands of a corporate Democrat who inspired no one, having previously attacked the wages and benefits of unions as the Democratic mayor of Milwaukee.

http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/06/10-5

20 Comments

20 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 4 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 2 years ago

See that democratic supporters? 11 democratic governers support the attack on public workers. How you people continue to support them is beyond me.

[-] 3 points by beautifulworld (20901) 2 years ago

Good article. Isn't OWS having a call to action for a living wage on June 20th? Here is the link:

http://occupywallst.org/article/occupy-midsummer-global-festivals-universal-living/

I think that is just the kind of thing labor needs to focus on. General worker rights instead of just "union" rights.

[-] 1 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 2 years ago

Check out this site. There is alot of good stuff on here and alot of its articles have audio.

http://blackagendareport.com/

[-] 1 points by beautifulworld (20901) 2 years ago

I just took a brief look and bookmarked it. Great stuff there. Looks like it takes in the whole African diaspora. Very nice. Thanks.

[-] 2 points by stevebol (1269) from Milwaukee, WI 2 years ago

Me too. That site is a trip, in a good way.

[-] 1 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 2 years ago

They got the dirt on Cory Booker and Al Sharpton.

[-] 1 points by beautifulworld (20901) 2 years ago

LOL

[-] 1 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 2 years ago

Absolutley, I should find out whats going on in my area. I've been out of the loop lately.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Unity in common cause - support workers rights - ALL WORKERS.

{:-])

[-] 2 points by beautifulworld (20901) 2 years ago

Yep. All workers!!

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

All anti-people politicians need to go - ALL OF THEM.

[-] 2 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 2 years ago

I mean for godsake look at the state of the unions how could you say that partnering with the democrats has been good for them in any sense of the word?

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

Unions have been their own worst enemy. Union workers are also to blame for letting their leadership run wild - just like the American people are to blame for letting government and business run wild.

[-] 1 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 2 years ago

Your absolutley right they have been their own worst enemy they allowed themselves to beccome embroiled in an abusive relationship with the democrats. It works like this the unions raise a bunch of money for the democrats and help to get them elected and then the democrats belt them in the mouth tell them to shut the fuck up while they pass a bunch of free trade agreements cut their benifits and genrally royally fuck them over. Meanwhile the union bosses just sit there and take it and some how convince the rank and file to take it as well.

[-] 2 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 2 years ago

I think we should start with the democrats first. At least the repulicans are honest about what they intend to do. The democrats mean to do the same thing except they hide behind the rhetoric of left leaning populism when they do it.

[-] 3 points by DKAtoday (28256) from Coon Rapids, MN 2 years ago

I think it would be better to take out the ones shouting at the Public - FUCK YOU - 1st. In my opinion. List em all and find replacements to support - true independents would be my hope with any sort of luck at all.

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 2 years ago

no more labor movement

everyone is going to put down the mp and stop worker

another call for

NO LABOR MOVEMENT

Smithers, we need those robots yesterday

[-] 1 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 2 years ago

Invertebrates have more backbone than Democrats.

[-] 1 points by PeterKropotkin (1050) from Oakland, CA 2 years ago

I sympathize with your statement but I think the reason democrats seem spineless is because the capitulate to the republicans and they seem to be easily bullied when I think the case is more often than not the democrats share the same values as repubicans. They don't have to be pushed very hard to capitulate because they all play for the same team in the first place.

[-] 1 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 2 years ago

You're correct. It does not appear the republicans are forcing democrats miles from their positions, more like yards.