Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Tulsi Gabbard for President!

Posted 2 years ago on Nov. 23, 2015, 1:50 a.m. EST by Shule (2638)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

U.S. Congresswoman Introduces Bill to Stop “illegal” War on Assad By Tyler Durden http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article43506.htm

In a remarkably candid interview with Wolf Blitzer, Gabbard calls Washington’s effort to oust Assad “counterproductive” and “illegal” before taking it a step further and accusing the CIA of arming the very same terrorists who The White House insists are “sworn enemies.”

In short, Gabbard all but tells the American public that the government is lying to them and may end up inadvertently starting “World War III.”

In an unusual alliance, a House Democrat and Republican have teamed up to urge the Obama administration to stop trying to overthrow Syrian President Bashar Assad and focus all its efforts on destroying Islamic State militants.

Reps. Tulsi Gabbard, a Democrat, and Austin Scott, a Republican, introduced legislation on Friday to end what they called an “illegal war” to overthrow Assad, the leader of Syria accused of killing tens of thousands of Syrian citizens in a more than four-year-old civil war entangled in a battle against IS extremists, also known as ISIS.

“The U.S. is waging two wars in Syria,” Gabbard said. “The first is the war against ISIS and other Islamic extremists, which Congress authorized after the terrorist attack on 9/11. The second war is the illegal war to overthrow the Syrian government of Assad.”

Scott said, “Working to remove Assad at this stage is counter-productive to what I believe our primary mission should be.”

Since 2013, the CIA has trained an estimated 10,000 fighters, although the number still fighting with so-called moderate forces is unclear. CIA-backed rebels in Syria, who had begun to put serious pressure on Assad’s forces, are now under Russian bombardment with little prospect of rescue by their American patrons, U.S. officials say.

For years, the CIA effort had foundered — so much so that over the summer, some in Congress proposed cutting its budget. Some CIA-supported rebels had been captured; others had defected to extremist groups.

Gabbard complained that Congress has never authorized the CIA effort, though covert programs do not require congressional approval, and the program has been briefed to the intelligence committees as required by law, according to congressional aides who are not authorized to be quoted discussing the matter.

Gabbard contends the effort to overthrow Assad is counter-productive because it is helping IS topple the Syrian leader and take control of all of Syria. If IS were able to seize the Syrian military’s weaponry, infrastructure and hardware, the group would become even more dangerous than it is now and exacerbate the refugee crisis.

And make no mistake, Tulsi’s understanding of Washington’s absurd Mid-East policy goes far beyond Syria. That is, Gabbard fully grasps the big picture as well. Here’s what she has to say about the idea that the US should everywhere and always attempt to overthrow regimes when human rights groups claim there’s evidence of oppression:

“People said the very same thing about Saddam (Hussein), the very same thing about (Moammar) Gadhafi, the results of those two failed efforts of regime change and the following nation-building have been absolute, not only have they been failures, but they’ve actually worked to strengthen our enemy.”

This gal needs to be President.

5 Comments

5 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by MattHolck0 (3867) 2 years ago

Burn a witch prince if you want to justify Jordain air strikes

[-] 2 points by turbocharger (1756) 2 years ago

Those 10k rebels ARE ISIS. This is all part of their plan.

I am glad to hear her speaking out against this horrific system we live under.

If only more people listened to her.

[-] 2 points by MattHolck0 (3867) 2 years ago

8k air strikes for 10k #ISIS terrorist ? we missed the target

[-] 2 points by MattHolck0 (3867) 2 years ago

still trying to save the sacred "evil" to justify killing people

there is no enemy

only people

[-] 1 points by MattHolck0 (3867) 2 years ago

the Iraqi people are not interested in destroying the islamic state

is that because our understanding on paints dashe Iraqi as evil ?