Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Thrasymaque's True Identity

Posted 2 years ago on Dec. 26, 2011, 7:51 a.m. EST by stuartchase (861)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

38 Comments

38 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by Rico (3027) 2 years ago

Based on my interactions with stuartchase here and elsewhere, I believe he we recruited by the government sometime back to disrupt OWS, first by advancing conspiracy theories that make us look stupid, and second by trying to turn people here against one another. If you don't think this happens, see http://www.law.uchicago.edu/files/file/387.pdf . Note the author, Cass Sunstein, is now the Administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cass_Sunstein ).

[Removed]

[Removed]

[Removed]

[-] 1 points by April (3196) 2 years ago

How about some onion soup with that?

http://www.occupywallst.org/forum/onion-rice-recipe/

[-] -1 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 2 years ago

Your reasoning and research skills are unparalleled my little MatLock. You give a great example for all the conspiracy theorists on this site. Your mind is sharper than the world's best butcher's sharpest knife.

Yuck! is right! I'll go as far as to say: Yucky Yucky!

Be careful guys, I'm not only a paid "agent", I'm also a child murderer! Keep your little Danny at bay! Here's Johnny! Mwhahahahaha!

It's axing time! You can cut this - la la la la LA la LA la, la la la la La la La la - you can cut this.

[-] 1 points by ModestCapitalist (2342) 2 years ago

48 hours ago, I had 2229 points. Now, its down to 1900. From now on, I will create another page daily and repost ALL of my essays in honor of those who use multiple IDs and/or bots to vote down my comments. CLICK ON ALL + SIGNS TO VIEW COMMENTS.

How do you like that you die-hard partisan puppet critics? Was this the result you were hoping for when you started using multiple IDs to aggressively track and 'vote down' my comments? Were you hoping to intimidate me? If so, I have some bad news for you.

IT DIDN'T WORK.

Say that reminds me.

The CBO report I am about to make reference to breaks down shares of net American income by quintile. Since a quintile represents 1/5, the middle quintile would certainly represent the 'middle class'. But we'll expand further out to all 5 quintiles just to cover all bases. Keep in mind these statistics represent income AFTER taxes.

Between 1979 and 2007, the share of net income for the lowest quintile dropped by 27.9 percent. Does that prove the expansion of the lowest class? Damn near it but lets eliminate all doubt.

Between 1979 and 2007, the share of net income for the second quintile, dropped by 23.6 percent. Does that prove the expansion of the lower class? Isn't it possible that the lowest two quintiles were always the lower class and the middle class had always represented just 1/5 of the US population? Well, thats what justhefacts would swear so lets eliminate that last shred of doubt. Lets move onto the middle quintile. The indisputable 'middle class'.

Between 1979 and 2007, the share of net income for the middle quintile dropped by 14.5 percent. There you go. Indisputable proof that at least 3/5 of Americans lost their relative share of net income between 1979 and 2007. Indisputable proof that America's middle class had shrunk and its lower class had expanded between 1979 and 2007. Indisputable mathematical proof. Still, lets move onto the next quintile.

Between 1979 and 2007, the share of net income for the fourth quintile dropped by 10.3 percent. There you go. Indisputable proof that at least 4/5 of Americans lost their relative share of net income between the years 1979 and 2007.

Bankruptcy and consumer debt rose significantly during this time frame. By 2007, consumer debt alone rose to nearly $2,000,000,000,000. Thats NEARLY TWO TRILLION DOLLARS.

So we've proven the actual shrinkage of the middle class and the actual expansion of the lower class. We've clearly established a loss of financial assets.

So where did the money go? The highest quintile? Lets take a look.

Between 1979 and 2007, the share of net income for the fifth quintile rose by 23.8 percent. Should we blame them? The highest quintile? Do we really want to blame a full 20% of the American population?

Not in my book. Lets take a closer look.

Between the years 1979 and 2007, the share of net income for the top decile (one tenth) rose by 40.2 percent. Thats a 16.4 percent spread just within 10 percent of the population. Lets take a closer look.

Between the years 1979 and 2007, the share of net income for the top ventile (one twentieth) rose by 61.9 percent. Thats a 21.9 percent spread just within 5 percent of the population. Interesting. Now, lets take a look at the final piece of the puzzle from this particular time frame.

Between 1979 and 2007, the start of the Great Recession and the worst financial crisis in nearly 80 years, the share of net income for the top centile (one hundredth, top 1%) rose by 128.0 percent. Thats a spread of 66.1 percent just within 5 percent of the population.

But that 66.1 percent spread is nothing. It is multiplied by hundreds just within that top centile. The richest 1%.

THATS THE PROBLEM.

Now, watch my die-hard partisan puppet critics deny the actual shrinkage of the middle class, the actual expansion of the lower class, and the actual transfer of wealth from poor to rich. In particular, the richest 1% who as of 2007, owned 43% of all financial wealth in America. Thats more than twice the share they held in 1976.

I see that my die-hard conservative partisan puppet critics and possibly another (Thrasymaque) who has admitted despising me more than any other user and using 'bots' of his own design to 'vote down' my comments are at it again. Be sure to click the '+' sign to view all comments.

http://occupywallst.org/forum/48-hours-ago-i-had-2229-points-on-this-ows-site-no/

[-] 1 points by stuartchase (861) 2 years ago

Nobody would pay you. You get assistance from your government like all of the other degenerates that can't hold a job.

[-] 0 points by blackbloc (-19) 2 years ago

you do know stuart chase was a socialist right? you libertarians are slow.

[-] 1 points by stuartchase (861) 2 years ago

Don't patronize me you stupid fuck. I'm am well aware of the author who wrote A New Deal and a Tyranny of words. I hold no political affiliation and I'm not slow.

[-] 0 points by blackbloc (-19) 2 years ago

ha ha ha you are a dim witted fool who fashions himself intelligent it is laughable.

[-] -1 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 2 years ago

Keep it coming MatLock. Give up more comedic material. We all need a good laugh.

[-] 1 points by stuartchase (861) 2 years ago

Then why don't you post a picture of your penis?

[-] -1 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 2 years ago

That wouldn't be very funny, and I never post porn on this site. You're the comedian around here, give us more conspiracy theory mumbo jumbo so we can all laugh. You were saying I was a child murderer. Perhaps you can expand upon this interesting idea. How do I stalk and kill children? What is my modus operandi and my motive? Please, do go on my little MatLockian friend.

[-] 1 points by stuartchase (861) 2 years ago

No, you admitted to going after children. Besides, your inadequacies are very funny, Pee-wee.

[-] 0 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 2 years ago

NO!!! Your research skills are too profound. You found me out. NO!!!

[-] 1 points by stuartchase (861) 2 years ago

stuartchase said 0 minutes ago at Dec. 26, 2011, 8:22 a.m. EST (delete)

Alright, get a girlfriend without paying for it. And she has to be of legal age!

Thrasymaque said 2 minutes ago at Dec. 26, 2011, 8:19 a.m. EST (delete)

Man, you're drowning your own self by posting nonsense and making it obvious to everyone that you're hyper ridiculous. I don't have to do anything. At least give me some kind of challenge.

[-] -1 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 2 years ago

Indeed. You're drowning your own self with your own ridiculous comments. You don't even realize it.

[-] 1 points by stuartchase (861) 2 years ago

Yeah, but your hung like the children you go after, self-admitted pervert.

Why don't you try dating people your own age?

[-] -1 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 2 years ago

I'm Pee-Wee Herman remember? Who the hell would want to date me.

[-] 1 points by 666isMONEY (348) 2 years ago

i'd date u, u're in bali now right?

[-] -1 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 2 years ago

Indeed I am. You too?

[-] 1 points by 666isMONEY (348) 2 years ago

no, i hear it's nice though I like MJ, Peter Pan and Pee Wee

[-] -1 points by Thrasymaque (-2138) 2 years ago

You'd be great with stuartchase. He keeps talking about these people. I think he's harboring a secret fantasy. You guys should hook up.

[-] 0 points by alouis (1511) from New York, NY 2 years ago

References: [1] "Treasury Targets Key Al-Qa’ida Funding and Support Network Using Iran as a Critical Transit Point," July 28, 2011, http://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/tg1261.aspx [2] "Treasury Accuses Iran of Aiding Al Qaeda," The New York times, July 28, 2011, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/29/world/29terror.html [3] "The 9/11 Commission Report," http://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/report/911Report.pdf [4] "U.S. Sees Iranian, al Qaeda Alliance," The Wall Street Journal, July 29, 2011, http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904888304576474160157070954.html?mod=googlenews_wsj [5] "U.S. Suggests a Qaeda Cell in Iran Directed Saudi Bombings," The New York Times, May 20, 2003, http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/21/international/middleeast/21IRAN.html?pagewanted=all [6] "Some U.S. Officials Fear Iran Is Helping Al Qaeda," Los Angeles Times, March 21, 2006, http://articles.latimes.com/2006/mar/21/world/fg-iranterror21 [7] "U.S. accuses Iran of aiding al-Qaeda," The Washington Post, July 29, 2011, http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/us-accuses-iran-of-aiding-al-qaeda/2011/07/28/gIQARUPxfI_story.html [8] Ibid.