Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: This web site is unfairly controled

Posted 1 year ago on Feb. 11, 2013, 1:28 p.m. EST by Aleksandar (43) from Toronto, ON
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

My last post has just being deleted. And what is even worse I could still see it, so that they give you an impression that everybody could see it, but I am the only one. That is cheating. That means the OWS forum is unfairly controlled. They might have a formal excuse for censoring me because the article was about conspiracy they do not allow to be talked about. But hey, this is the only way to go. Could you imagine healing somebody but the only thing you are forbidden to give is a medicine? You better find some other place to communicate because whenever somebody comes closer to the solution, he would be censored. In the meantime please visit my web site www.sarovic.com. You will find there everything you need to fix this world.

18 Comments

18 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by ZenDog (20508) from South Burlington, VT 1 year ago

I would agree that the moderation is a bit . . . erratic -

although I must confess, I seem to have been treated more than fairly regardless of overall moderation policy and practice.

[-] 2 points by jrhirsch (4714) from Sun City, CA 1 year ago

The most important question that nobody raises or can answer here is who is running this site? Could be the Koch brothers for all we know. We ask for transparency in government and business, but when it comes to our own organization it's completely opaque.

[-] 2 points by alldone (32) 1 year ago

Shadow banning? What is that about? Isn't this the anti-thesis of what OWS is about?

Sure some posts might be against the TOS but surely there is a better way to keep this under control then SECRETLY and DECEITFULLY keep out the public gaze, as the OP suggests.

[-] 2 points by peacehurricane (293) 1 year ago

I also have written things that just disappear and it seems the most effective of communications I manage to organize onto computer. Since my thinking has become a bit jumbled this sucks. I will check your site.

[Removed]

[-] 2 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

it's frustrating discovering your labors are ignored

[-] 0 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

You got that right. But how can you write both this comment and the minus 3 comment at the bottom?

[-] 2 points by Renneye (3166) 1 year ago

I agree wholeheartedly. Nevada1 contacted me a few days ago by PM, and he/she (still don't know which, lol!) told me that he/she is on a full ban since about 5 weeks ago. Nev1 has managed to get a new moniker periodically, only to be banned within a short while again. I feel bad because Nev1 was a really fair poster here. I hope Nevada1 is 'allowed' to come back. Geesh!

[-] 2 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

once under the targeting of banning

it's only a mater of time before another violation is found

makes one care less not more about violations

[-] 2 points by Renneye (3166) 1 year ago

You're right Matt. The first couple times it happened to me...I really felt as though I had done something wrong. After that, I was just that much more resilient. The oligarchs will get what's coming to them regardless of whether we're 'allowed' to talk here or not. It may take a wee bit longer, but enough people know about the oligarchs now. That genie will be impossible to put back in the bottle.

[-] 0 points by Aleksandar (43) from Toronto, ON 1 year ago

Why would a well documented conspiracy theory be the violation of rules? Why we would not have the right to talk about it? Have you consider that this might protect people who create evil all over the world? And then, it comes to my mind that they may control this web site and make donkeys from everyone who fights for changes.

[-] 3 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

complexity of conspiracy can often be simplified to motivation as opposed to organization.

what is the theory you refer to ?

[-] 3 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

the bank determines who is funded and who is not

[-] 1 points by Aleksandar (43) from Toronto, ON 1 year ago

Then where is the horizontal equality?

[-] 1 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

that exists in the physical realm

we are all humans within it

[-] 1 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 1 year ago

This site has gotten much higher tech. I used to be able to see which comments of mine were shadow banned or not. Now this computer is recognized even if I have no scripts running, no cookies, and come through a different IP address.

Nevada is one of the oldies but goodies, super goodies.

[-] 2 points by Aleksandar (43) from Toronto, ON 1 year ago

I have to correct myself. The article is not deleted but when replaying to it, it jumps up to the first place of the thread only in my computer. For all of you it goes down to the drain, which is the same thing as deleting it.

[-] -3 points by MattLHolck (16833) from San Diego, CA 1 year ago

find another website