Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: The War on Food

Posted 10 years ago on Sept. 6, 2013, 9:15 a.m. EST by kubrick21 (0)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

The War on Food

Imagine tomorrow when you wake up the headline, "American Declares War on Food".  Sounds silly?  Kind of, right?  How could it be enforced?  We would die of starvation.  You can't outlaw food!  We need food to eat, etc, etc.
Take a minute and consider how much Americans spend on food and on a similar vice: drugs.  In the US, the food industry accounts for 1.2 trillion dollars per year.  In other words, Americans consume or spend 1.2 trillion dollars on eating food every year.  Not too outlandish, right?  Other countries eat more, most eat less, but not out of line.  Imagine though the amount of money America spends on drugs in America per year, would you imagine it to be more or less?  Well, lets see..me and the wife spent about $50 going out to eat the other day..the wife spends $250 at the grocery every week or so, give or take..I buy a round of beer at the bar at bowling on Thursdays. I assume most Americans would venture to guess more money is spent on food than on drugs in our country.  I eat three meals per day as do most people, a minimal percentage of people use drugs and I'm sure they typically use less than three times per day..no brainer, right?  Wrong.  The amount of money spent on eating in America is equal to that Americans spend on drugs.  Equal.  1.2 trillion dollars worth!

Well, we can't outlaw food, we need it to live, right? Where is the correlation? Ask yourself this, what would a war on food look like? How would we ever have the resources necessary to arrest the little old lady baking cookies in her oven and why would we care, she is not hurting anyone? Outlawing soda is ridiculous, imagine the outrage kids would have when they can't drink their sodas at school? How silly would it be to arrest the patrons at McDonalds for ordering at the drive-thru. "Ma'am, we saw you order that Big Mac, no sense in lying about it, you'll have to come downtown with us." Not only would it be impossible to eradicate eating, it would not make much sense to arrest someone for this, our jails would be full and the idea of arresting or outlawing something like this makes no sense to begin with, right? Even if high fructose corn syrup is bad for our health and 30% of Americans will be considered obese in 20 years, outlawing food would be a waste of time and money, right? Food is necessary and much of it healthy, etc, etc. Think for a moment of the scale here. Outlawing food is silly, right? It provides sustenance and nutrition, and without it, it would cause a health concern and possibly over time, death. Plus it wouldn't be possible to have a war on food, there would be people who made food anyway and most would resort to this I would imagine or they would starve and die and suffer much injustice.
The US spends a great deal of unnecessary money on doing something very similar. We give other countries three billion dollars a year to eradicate drugs in their countries, we give our Coast Guard one billion a year to stop drug shipments from coming into this country from Latin America and Mexico. Americans spend 100 million dollars per year on consuming alcohol, 35 million dollars a year on smoking. The US loses 200 million a year on tobacco related job loss and medical issues, not to mention the addiction of nicotine and it's effects, including a shorter life span for smokers, and the complications with drunk driving (up to and including death). 300 billion is spent on Big Pharma, to give us our Xanax and our Oxycodone and on and on. The illegal drug trade is bigger, an estimated 400 billion dollars of American cold, hard cash is spent on marijuana, and the like in the illegal drug trade every year. This in no way speaks to the loss of life and time chasing an invisible enemy that will never be defeated because it never existed in the first place. Legislating moral issues has never and will never work or fix anything, in fact, making drugs illegal by some accounts makes the problem worse.
What do we do? The first thing we do is understand this is currently going on. Arguments can be made that using pharmacy drugs is beneficial and drugs like alcohol and cigarettes are legal, so they should not be included here. Fine. The War on Food will be Monday to Thursday. You get the idea. The scale here is what is important. Drugs need to be de-criminalized at the least. The loss of jobs due to a police record and the time to pay for courts is not even included in this discussion. More than half our prisoners are in jail due to having been arrested for drug use. Putting a person in a 24 hour care facility costs half as much as housing a person in prison and the rates of recidivism are much less. One idea to understand the scope and one I would like to see if only for one year, would be if we call a moratorium on drug spending for one year. Doing so, we could afford to give every college graduate $217,000 and it would be an even deal. We would eradicate our entire student loan debt in one year and reward those who struggle and work hard to improve themselves in these tough times. Plus I am one. I reference the following website in writing this article, http://www.drugsense.org/mcwilliams/www.mcwilliams.com/books/books/aint/2050.htm Much thanks to it's author.. Dr. Ben Meyer

2 Comments

2 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 10 years ago

You might get some people to read this if you were to put in paragraphs ( edit the post put in paragraphs or dialog breaks ). The GR8 wall of text is kind of a turn off. Also at the beginning of your post? The 1st two lines that run off of the page? If you edit - you can back space ( probably only necessary to do the 1st line ) the line so that it meets the left side border - this will alter the text so that it fits the page.

[-] 0 points by richlago1 (-25) 10 years ago

"We would eradicate our entire student loan debt in one year". The Banksters would never go for that. They've engineered that student loan debt can not be resolved with bankruptcy.