Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: The value of your paycheck continues to fall, and security is here to keep it on the DL.

Posted 11 years ago on Nov. 26, 2012, 3:12 p.m. EST by richardkentgates (3269)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

The frauds on this forum continue to attack me for pointing this out. How can one support the 99% while hammering anyone that mentions this issue?

TrapWire tied to anti-Occupy Internet-spy program

Getting paid to subvert The People, how noble. Or is that anti-American? Anti-Democratic? Orwellian? I'll let you think on it for a while.

48 Comments

48 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

sigh

It isn't the information that is a problem. It's you.

How many socks do you have, sweet pea?

[-] -2 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

What does that have to do with the article? mmmmmmnothing...

Speaking of socks, the article touches on the use of socks in online communities, communities just like this forum.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

Like yours.

How many socks do you have, sweet pea?

[-] -3 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

Funny how you are more outraged by my continued pushing of an economic issue that effects the 99% than a security company tasked with suppressing Occupy. Who's side are you on again?

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

Applause. Nice try. C for effort.

Your initial postings were all about you and whatever little creative project that you were involved in at the time. Here we are a year later and your posts are all about you. Still.

You are decidedly to the right which is fine. You kind of make information up as you go. And you insist on acting like an ass for anyone who is liberal. So, you are against unions and only against pipelines when it pleases you. You have multiple IDs.

Dun Dun Dun.........................

and I had no problem thinking that you were still ok until http://occupywallst.org/forum/progressive-change/

You are either a troll or you are in the middle of a fucking meltdown.

How many socks do you have, sweet pea?

[-] -2 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

Still no outrage over paid efforts to suppress Occupy. Still no explanation as to why you call the devaluing of our paychecks a conspiracy theory, even when shown hard data. Much like the other user names, this one is now also exposed. You tools are wasting your time. The game is over whether you accept it or not.

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

Jeeze, did you already forget posting stuff from the Wall Street Journal?

[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

Disprove the data and you'll be cooking with gas. But you can't. All you can do is struggle to regain control, but you won't.

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

Control of what richard?

[-] -2 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

You tell me. I post about a devalued dollar and firms hired to suppress Occupy, and I get attacked profusely. What do you think onlookers see? It damn sure isn't the picture you've been working frantically to paint.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

You nitwit, the character UncleJoe, cousin Joe, or whatever Joe was data-mining about at least a fucking year ago. He fucking said so outright.

[-] -2 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

Ah, the "this is old news" downplay bit. In fact, it's clearly happening right now, so that trick is not going to sell.

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

There is no fucking trick, Dick.

Remember the jack ass that was writing a book and would kick out chapters and then a few days later the issues in the chapter hit the forum? The hive and all that? Caught that shit too and guess what? That shit didn't end there either.

WTF is it that you want me to do? This far into it, I am trying to find value in these others as human. I try to find something decent in them. Tho' that one is a little tough and sometimes it isn't fucking worth it.

Shooz lives one state up from me. He is retired and is pro union. He takes pretty good pictures. Sorry, you will have to sell that shit to someone else. I am not buying it, Dick.

BTW, how many socks do you have, sweet pea?

[+] -4 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

Still, in light of more proof that Occupy is being targeted online for suppression, my points about our checks meaning less day by day, backed by hard data, you still come at me. As if discrediting me will make the data go away.


Fact

The devaluation is the largest factor in the build up to our current economic inequality.


Fact

Money is being spent to suppress Occupy's online activities and this forum is the #1 ranked Occupy site.


It may take you a while and with the potential motivators, you may never yield. But the game is over and acknowledgement of that fact is not required.

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

Fuck you. You are the fucking troll.

[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

You know that's not how that went richard.

Why lie now?

Besides, I'm not now, nor have I EVER used a sock puppet to post two threads who's purpose was to discredit other posters. This one would make it three, but at least it's under one name.

I fight my own battles, richard. I don't employ puppets. I don't start threads to discredit anyone in an attempt to gain sympathy..

You do those things richard.

[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

Really? Let me post some links on the topics so people can see me being attacked on threads that do matter to the 99%.


The user name shooz even jumped in on this one.

http://occupywallst.org/forum/inflation-hidden-behind-the-battle-against-deflati/


http://occupywallst.org/forum/dollar-now-in-decline-as-i-told-you-it-would-be/


http://occupywallst.org/forum/the-dollar-is-rising-in-value-which-would-help-the/


and then there is your lack of outrage over people spending lots of money to suppress Occupy online, which no doubt must include the top ranking Occupy site, this forum.

[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

I'll tell you the same now, that I told you then.

FUCK the Wall Street Journal!

Wall Street has been and still is devaluing our dollars every single day, in every single way they can find to make a profit off of it.

It's what they do.

Now let me make myself perfectly clear.

FUCK the Wall Street Journal!!!

It's a rag printed by the folks that bring you FLAKESnews and can't be trusted.

You can now include the DOW in that equation as well

Rupert owns them.

[-] 0 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 11 years ago

I dont watch Fox either. The last two shows I watched on the MSM were Dylan RAttigan and Judge Napalitano.

Needless to say, they were both canned. The judge was openly fired, despite climbing ratings, and Dylan "left on his own"....

Ive tried to give some of the others a shot, like Maddow, but its just such PR garbage that its more frustrating than anything else. I would love to see Maddow on something like RT though, where she could let loose, because I do think she is pretty quick and funny.

Its been a few years since I got the journal, but the ftew issues I find when out and around seem to be fairly decent. But yes, nothing is as it seems.

[-] 0 points by hchc (3297) from Tampa, FL 11 years ago

Actually a lot of good stuff is in the journal. You should get a few copies and read through them, theres a lot of good financial and foreign country stuff in there.

The ownership of the DOW and its Fed injections are a bit deeper than Murdoch.

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

They no longer have any credibility and cannot be used as a resource. I was a fan of WSJ. So, you have to take whatever they say and then find as many other sources to verify.

[-] 2 points by JesseHeffran (3903) 11 years ago

I kinda feel what you are saying. WSJ does produce some great articles, but with all the scandals that Rupert has gotten himself into, I can see why no one takes anything he produces seriously. The worst thing the WSJ did was get in bed with Rupert. A paper or any media outlet ain't worth shit once it loses its credibility. And the WSJ is guilty by association

[-] 0 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

No thanks.

I don't watch FLAKESnews either.

Control of the DOW is why Rupert bought the WSJ, don't underestimate him. EVER.

[+] -4 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

I've gotten what I need. I'm not playing the game any more. The game is over and I'm going to make sure it stays over. You ass hats want data, collect all you want, but stay out of our damn way. This is our country. It does not belong to 1%ers. Collect your check and shut the fuck up.

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 11 years ago

Oh, OK.

Does that mean you're going to quit reading the preferred press releases of the 1% now?

I certainly hope you desist from posting ideas you've gleaned from them.

You see richard, I reject their view of the economy.

I like these guys.

http://bilbo.economicoutlook.net/blog/

http://moslereconomics.com/wp-content/powerpoints/7DIF.pdf

That last ones deep and goes WAY beyond anything you've read in the WSJ.

I won't pretend to understand it well enough to get into it with you but the last place to find info is anything at all to do with News Crop.

Macro economics isn't a sport for us amateurs.

Geo had a good handle on it, but the trolls finally got to him.

So stop pretending some BS in the WSJ is the Gods truth about anything at all.

It isn't.

With that out of the way, I'm done being nice.

[+] -4 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

Take your time. It won't matter what gear you switch to at this point.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

How many socks do you have, Dick?

Your game is over.

[-] -3 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

thx sweety. I'm currently not wearing socks.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

Blow me, I will buy one for your epoch fail at condescending terminology.

[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

*epic. Not that I can spell worth a damn. I also don't wear socks with flip flops. But you northerners sure do look funny when you come down here wearing socks with your flip flops and bad-taste sandals ;)

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

I don't do that shit. In fact, I caught all kinds of hell moving to Chicago, you ass.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 11 years ago

Chi town? Hell we are almost next door neighbors now - just Wisconny standing between us. They are a dairy state so I don't think they mean any harm - like it's not intentional or anything.

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

It is special. It's a cow town. Make no mistake. It is also the first time that I have heard..................you can have this job if you do some heroin.

I do not forget AND I never fucking forgive.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 11 years ago

Are you all right, GF?

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

I am perfectly fine,

This is how the real world works.

I don't care what you think of me. Get my people off the street.

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 11 years ago

What? I have had people come after me - but that was a long time ago - what is going on?


[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (10429) 0 minutes ago

Exactly what I said.

Lemme ask you something, you ever gone to a town and had every fucking dealer within a 50 mile radius come for you? ↥twinkle ↧stinkle permalink

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

No, nobody is coming after me. Nor did i mean to imply that. I am merely stating how this cow town works.

[-] -1 points by thestonemill (-93) 11 years ago

You must be doing some very heavy drugs or prescription pills??

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 11 years ago

Huh(?) wah(?)Huh????

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

Exactly what I said.

Lemme ask you something, you ever gone to a town and had every fucking dealer within a 50 mile radius come for you?

I do not forgive and I never forget.

[-] 0 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

good times

[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

You think it's easy standing alone, potentially alienating perfectly innocent people? The forum wasn't and still isn't making sense and while pointing an individual finger is next to impossible, seeing the pattern is not. But when you're fighting for the future of the country your kids will grow up in and that fight is being waged with information exchange, do you submit, even seeing the pattern, knowing the people we protest could, would, and documents show they have spent money to subvert your end of that fight, what the fuck would you do? Give in to peer pressure, or decide the battle is more important than self image? Take it or leave it but you are not my priority. Sorry.

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

Do not let them take your fucking mind.

[-] 2 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 11 years ago

That ship has sailed.

[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

says the user that brags about tweeting to an account that is set to private.

[-] 0 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 11 years ago

You still don't understand how that works? Not surprising.

[-] -2 points by richardkentgates (3269) 11 years ago

It's not a question of whether or not it's happening. It's a question of who. If you keep fucking with me, I will personally make it an international story when I find out.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 11 years ago

You do that. In fact, I'm counting on it.