Forum Post: The truth about filthy rich celebrities and 'humanitarian' work. Basically, it's a load of crap.
Posted 12 years ago on Oct. 21, 2011, 3:22 p.m. EST by Mcc
(542)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
The rich and famous do not want to be seen as 'pigs' or go down in history as 'villains'. They want to be seen as 'heros' and go down in history as 'humanitarians'. The market for their product has become global. The fan base has become global. Therefore, the 'humanitarian' effort and 'good will' PR machine has gone global. These 'humanitarian' efforts and 'good deeds' are not chosen to address the greatest need or injustice. They are chosen almost exclusively to appeal to the largest demographic for their respective commercial products. The largest fan base. Efficiency or effect is of little or no concern. Its all about PR, marketing, image, and fame. This is why so many of the rich and famous have taken up 'philanthropy' or 'good will' around the world. This is why so many have 'schools' or 'foundations' in their name. This is why so many play golf or appear on a TV game show for 'charity'. This is why so many sign motorcycles, other merchandise, or auction off their own 'personal effects' for 'charity'. This is why so many have TV shows with a 'charitable' gimmick. This is why so many arrange photo ops with wounded veterans, firefighters, or sick children. This is why so many have adopted children from around the world (Which they always pay others to care for full time. The hired professionals are sworn by legal contract to confidentiality. Not allowed to discuss or appear in public with the children they care for. Those 'photo' and 'interview' opportunities are reserved exclusively for the rich and famous 'adoptive' parents. Often sold for millions.). This is why every 'humanitarian' effort and 'good deed' is plastered all over the media worldwide. Its not about 'humanity' or 'good will'. Its all about marketing, image, fame, and PROFIT. This is why we are so often reminded of their respective 'good deeds' or 'humanitarian' efforts shortly before or after the release of their latest commercial product. IT IS A SHAM. THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A MULTI-MILLIONAIRE HUMANITARIAN. GOOD WILL HAS BECOME BIG BUSINESS.
Disaster Capitalism. I wonder what would happen if a humanitarian like Angelia Jolie went to Tibet with a big entourage and refused to leave unless the Chinese officially recognized Tibet as an independent nation? Or Madonna came down to the OWS protests and set up camp with them? I heard Jay-Z and Russel Simmons had a walk through, what if they had stayed to really support the movement? Where's Sean Penn!!???!
"THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A MULTI-MILLIONAIRE HUMANITARIAN."
Bullshit! You are peddling hatred and intolerance, my friend...
Even Jesus had some rich friends, such as Mary of Magdala, Joanna and Susanna. These women were the first patrons of the "Jesus Movement".