Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: The trolls are fake

Posted 7 years ago on Nov. 25, 2012, 9:08 p.m. EST by richardkentgates (3269)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Seriously, who are you kidding?

To the looky-loos

The trolls are characters created and cultivated to create a common enemy in order to strengthen and support a partisan atmosphere. The trolls are the same users that claim to be supporters. They are not trolls nor are they supporters. They have no purpose other than to railroad this forum into uselessness. What you see on this forum is engineered interaction.

To the x-military and x-law-enforcement that has been hired to Occupy this forum

I understand it's your job to keep up the ruse, so I'll just keep informing the looky-loos until you no longer have this job.



Read the Rules
[-] 3 points by elf3 (4129) 7 years ago

But the posts aren't the movement Richard - it's the fury behind it - whatever pseudo - psychological experiments they want to run on here (if it is true) will fail. When there is no longer a wealth gap and corruption - then this could all fizzle. Until then - people are pissed and they aren't putting up with it anymore. They hate corporate America. They have to work for them, get downsized by them, get overcharged by them, foreclosed on by them, they have to bail them out with their meager earnings, they have to work for them when they are sick or watch a relative get sicker because they can't take time to be there to help or to afford it, the list goes on and on. Wall Street when you're done sticking Americans and the world population in the ass please send us the memo, until then - get ready for a long arduous un-ending war against us...well you've been doing that for a while - what I meant was get ready for us to fight back. We are 99 to 1 (we can't lose). I won't wish you luck.

[-] 1 points by KevinPotts (368) 7 years ago

(Round of Applause)

[-] 3 points by therising (6643) 7 years ago

Got a list?

[-] 3 points by highlander (-163) 7 years ago

Who cares about trolls? Perhaps I am showing naivette, but if there is a post or statement that is not, in your opinion, relevent to the topic, then just ignore it!!

[-] 1 points by stevebol (1269) from Milwaukee, WI 7 years ago

The word "troll" is not part of my day-to-day vobabulary. It might mean something on Huff Post but it means nothing on this forum.


[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8706) 7 years ago

-Can't be helped the track is covered Hopeless we have lost the way Demons must have taken over Whilrling, twisting us astray . . .


So let us disregard all this and merely carry on . . .

[-] 1 points by DanielBarton (1345) 7 years ago

hahah trolls on this forum we are all trolls one way or another

[-] 1 points by doitagain (234) from Brooklyn, NY 7 years ago

we are all being trolled to the point or moment in which your account has being suspended by ordinary users with more privileges

[-] 0 points by DanielBarton (1345) 7 years ago

explain that last bit a little more

[-] 0 points by richardkentgates (3269) 7 years ago

But hey, it doesn't matter if we find out the truth. We're all just a bunch of pantie waste liberals, right?


[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 7 years ago

Reactions are so much more informative than words. Something about repetitive training is almost impossible to disguise.

[-] 2 points by rayolite (461) 7 years ago

Grouping without reason in support of faulty proposals for change. When you see that false agreement, that has spurious junk news stuff for filler, you know they are using the buzz created on web video between icons working to rally involvement.

[-] -2 points by Coyote88 (-24) 7 years ago

So unless everyone agrees with everybody else then they are the "enemy"?

[-] -2 points by richardkentgates (3269) 7 years ago

Most commonly used tactic to begin working forum users.

New users: Reply with a handful of troll comments to gather demographic data. Then gain their trust by sending in a "supporter" to defend or back up the new user(s).(very jailhouse by the way)

Unsecured variables/users: Work in a new "supporter" name, work up some points for credibility, assign the "supporter" with believable levels of agreement and disagreement in relation to the target user(s). Then use private messaging and/or commenting to find an opening, a topic that you are more willing to open up to someone else in the course of discussion. (I am most commonly asked how to post pictures or other tech related questions)

Once a user is brought into the clique, they can be nudged by social pressure and other means to stay within the desired range of conversation, such as partisan posts, ego fluff, and otherwise emotional bait.

Keep fighting, I'm learning.

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 7 years ago

Do not let them take your mind.

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 7 years ago

I think we're too late...............................:(

[-] -1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 7 years ago

Well, to be fair, he is right up on it. The problem is that he has his own socks and, at this point, I fail to see how dropping this little tidbit of info is useful. This little group does a shoddy job of discreet communication. It is almost as if it is intentionally shoddy.

[-] 1 points by shoozTroll (17632) 7 years ago

He's starting to remind me of the folks who used to accuse me of being some kind on psy-op for the CIA.

It makes me laugh.............................:)

[-] -2 points by richardkentgates (3269) 7 years ago

Getting a little warmer every day. Besides, I have two documents, one for a lobbying group, and one from a security firm. Both soliciting contracts to engage and neutralize Occupy. You want to keep pretending, fine, be my guest.

[-] 2 points by GirlFriday (17435) 7 years ago

Drop the docs.

[-] -1 points by richardkentgates (3269) 7 years ago

lol, drop the hard data. Sure, whatever.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 7 years ago

If you are insinuating that I am aligned with either of those two groups than bring it.

[-] -2 points by richardkentgates (3269) 7 years ago

I'm telling you I have hard evidence that neutralizing Occupy seems to be worth a LOT of fucking money, and your advice is to drop that? It looks like you're bringing quite enough.

[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 7 years ago

Richard, I am telling you that if you are making an accusation towards me than I expect you to fucking prove it. If you are suggesting that you are the only one that is aware that there is a troll problem and that they truly do suck at their attempts to communicate with each other than you would be wrong here as well. In fact, I would go so far to say that it is about time that you caught on.

[-] -2 points by richardkentgates (3269) 7 years ago

I'll tell you what it looks like, then you tell me.

It looks like a trust exercise. If I trust you, I will back down. If I doubt you, I will be evasive, like I am now.

  1. I never accused you of anything
  2. You're fishing for confirmation or denial on an accusation not stated
[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 7 years ago

I'll tell you what it looks like, then you tell me.

You want to keep pretending, fine, be my guest.

Skip it. I do not give a fuck what you think.

[-] -2 points by richardkentgates (3269) 7 years ago


[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 7 years ago

You think that I am a troll?

[-] 0 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 7 years ago

I'll say it. Yes, I think you are a troll.

You argued in support of Scalia in Bush v. Gore. That was the exact point at which America made its disastrous turn towards evil.

Her exact quote:

"[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (10343) 1 month ago

Yep. That case [Bush v. Gore] was a requirement.

You have nothing.

You don't like the fact that he is an originalist and you don't like his eyes. You are afraid that if the rethuglican is in office that he will appoint someone that is also an originalist and will read the law too narrowly. Fine. ↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink" http://occupywallst.org/forum/piers-morgan-recently-had-scalia-on-his-show/#comment-856774

My response: "[-] 1 points by nomdeguerre (1482) from Brooklyn, NY 1 month ago

Wow, just wow. Thanks for letting us know who you are. I would never have imagined that you were a 99.9% true disinfo spook. Now we see the truth.

Well genius, why did the court say the Bush v Gore ruling applied only to this case (set aside the fact that that's a constitutional impossibility)? I'm not really interested in your tortured answer. I'm simply happy to know who and what you are. ↥twinkle ↧stinkle reply permalink" http://occupywallst.org/forum/piers-morgan-recently-had-scalia-on-his-show/#comment-856956

I believe you are morally and intellectually bankrupt. I also recall your resisting the call to free the marijuana prisoners, but I couldn't find the post right now.

Incidentally, what's your point about Scalia's eyes.

[-] 0 points by GirlFriday (17435) 7 years ago

Hahahahaha! Yeah-you don't count. Really you don't. You are the dimwit with the quotes that managed to take all of that out of context, yeah? Intentionally obtuse, much? Yes, yes, you are. You have failed again.

[-] 1 points by nomdeguerre (1775) from Brooklyn, NY 7 years ago

Just out of curiosity what do you think of the trumped up case against Don Siegelman? http://occupywallst.org/forum/40-days-to-free-don-siegelman-case-reminiscent-of-/