Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: The Taliban offered to turn over Bin Laden. Chomsky: No Evidence That Al-Qaeda Carried Out The 9/11 Attacks!

Posted 1 year ago on May 10, 2012, 1:01 p.m. EST by fiftyfourforty (1077) from New York, NY
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

The Taliban offered to turn over Bin Laden.

http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/01/08/breaking-no-evidence-that-al-qaeda-carried-out-the-911-attacks/

BREAKING: No Evidence That Al-Qaeda Carried Out The 9/11 Attacks! JANUARY 8, 2011 BY VOLUBRJOTR COMMENTS OFF

Noam Chomsky Leading liberal intellectual Noam Chomsky just told Press TV:

“The explicit and declared motive of the [Afghanistan] war was to compel the Taliban to turn over to the United States, the people who they accused of having been involved in World Trade Center and Pentagon terrorist acts. The Taliban…they requested evidence…and the Bush administration refused to provide any,” the 81-year-old senior academic made the remarks on Press TV’s program a Simple Question.

“We later discovered one of the reasons why they did not bring evidence: they did not have any.”

The political analyst also said that nonexistence of such evidence was confirmed by FBI eight months later.

“The head of FBI, after the most intense international investigation in history, informed the press that the FBI believed that the plot may have been hatched in Afghanistan, but was probably implemented in the United Arab Emirates and Germany.”

Chomsky added that three weeks into the war, “a British officer announced that the US and Britain would continue bombing, until the people of Afghanistan overthrew the Taliban… That was later turned into the official justification for the war.”

“All of this was totally illegal. It was more, criminal,” Chomsky said.

As Wired wrote on September 27, 2001:

President Bush has said he has evidence that Osama bin Laden was behind the attacks, so it would seem obvious that the FBI would include him and other suspects on its 10 most wanted fugitives Web page.

Think again.

Bin Laden is listed, but only for the 1998 bombings of U.S. embassies in Tanzania and Kenya. There is no mention of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing or the attacks on the USS Cole in October 2000, both of which he is widely believed to have orchestrated. And forget about Sept. 11.

The reason? Fugitives on the list must be formally charged with a crime, and bin Laden is still only a suspect in the recent attacks in New York City and Washington.

“There’s going to be a considerable amount of time before anyone associated with the attacks is actually charged,” said Rex Tomb, who is head of the FBI’s chief fugitive publicity unit and helps decide which fugitives appear on the list. “To be charged with a crime, this means we have found evidence to confirm our suspicions, and a prosecutor has said we will pursue this case in court.”

Larry C. Johnson, a former CIA officer who was deputy director of the U.S. State Department Office of Counterterrorism from 1989 to 1993, said in a Sept. 12 interview conducted by Frontline that there is no concrete proof that bin Laden is responsible for the USS Cole and the 1993 WTC attacks, but bin Laden celebrates those attacks and associates himself with people who are responsible for it.

President Bush promises to reveal evidence linking bin Laden to the suicide hijackers who attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Bin Laden has applauded the attacks but denies direct involvement.

The Bush administration never provided such evidence.

As I wrote last December:

President Obama said Tuesday night as justification for the surge in troops in Afghanistan:

We did not ask for this fight. On September 11, 2001, 19 men hijacked four airplanes and used them to murder nearly 3,000 people.

Al Qaeda’s base of operations was in Afghanistan, where they were harbored by the Taliban”, who refused to turn over Osama bin Laden.

Is that true?

On October 14, 2001, the Taliban offered to hand over Osama bin Laden to a neutral country if the US halted bombing if the Taliban were given evidence of Bin Laden’s involvement in 9/11.

Specifically, as the Guardian writes:

Returning to the White House after a weekend at Camp David, the president said the bombing would not stop, unless the ruling Taliban “turn [bin Laden] over, turn his cohorts over, turn any hostages they hold over.” He added, “There’s no need to discuss innocence or guilt. We know he’s guilty” …

Afghanistan’s deputy prime minister, Haji Abdul Kabir, told reporters that the Taliban would require evidence that Bin Laden was behind the September 11 terrorist attacks in the US.

“If the Taliban is given evidence that Osama bin Laden is involved” and the bombing campaign stopped, “we would be ready to hand him over to a third country”, Mr Kabir added.

However, as the Guardian subsequently points out:

A senior Taliban minister has offered a last-minute deal to hand over Osama bin Laden during a secret visit to Islamabad, senior sources in Pakistan told the Guardian last night.

For the first time, the Taliban offered to hand over Bin Laden for trial in a country other than the US without asking to see evidence first in return for a halt to the bombing, a source close to Pakistan’s military leadership said.

And yet … the U.S. turned down the offer and instead prosecuted war.

And in 2006, FBI agent Rex Tomb told reporter Ed Haas that the FBI still did not have enough evidence:

The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.

In fact, many leading liberals have expressed doubts about 9/11, including Daniel Ellsberg, Ray McGovern, William Blum, Dennis Kucinich, Mike Gravel, Lewis Lapham, Dan Hamburg, Michael Moore, Cindy Sheehan, Amy Goodman, Thom Hartmann, Rabbi Michael Lerner, Marc Crispin Miller, Howard Zinn, Robert McChesney, Gore Vidal, Chris Floyd, Robert Fisk, Medea Benjamin, Doris “Granny D” Haddock, Paul Hawken, David Cobb, Randy Hayes, Ernest Callenbach, Dennis Bernstein, Paul H. Ray, Michael Franti, Janeane Garafalo and Ed Asner.

10 Comments

10 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by Nevada1 (4024) 1 year ago

Hi fifty, Thank you for post. Best Regards

[-] 2 points by Deadbeat (11) from Austin, TX 1 year ago

I'm glad they are finally catching up to the 9-11 truth movement 11 years after the fact. Unfortunately these "leading liberals" played gatekeeper roles most of that time and accepted the official story for over a decade. It was well know back in 2001 that the Taliban told the Bush Administration that they would extradite Bin Laden if the U.S. presented evidence of his involvement in 9-11 yet no evidence was presented by the U.S.

However naturally Chomsky won't mention the "Dancing Israelis".

[-] 2 points by fiftyfourforty (1077) from New York, NY 1 year ago

And Chomsky seems to have discovered late in the game that the Taliban had made two offers to turn over Bin laden and that the US had no actual evidence connecting Bin Laden to the crimes of 9/11. I put it here because if these folks (Asner is one who was an earlier truther, he deserves some respect for this) are at the least "doubters" of the official line it might be time for OWS to at least tolerate discussion of this matter on this website.

(edit) Interesting that Chomsky's initial line re 9/11 was "WHO CARES?" Now it is significant in his eyes that the FBI never had evidence linking Bin Laden to the crimes and that the Taliban had twice offered to turn him over.

[-] 1 points by Nevada1 (4024) 1 year ago

Everyone should see this post.

[-] 2 points by fiftyfourforty (1077) from New York, NY 1 year ago

I think so too, but I fear this post was quickly shadow banned.

[Removed]

[-] 0 points by torusngamble (9) 1 year ago

This is only news to American Sheeple that never wanted to know the Truth about 9/11 then, and sure as Hell don't want to know the Truth about 9/11 now....

[-] 2 points by fiftyfourforty (1077) from New York, NY 1 year ago

I wouldn't write off all the American people. Reality is biting. Even a long time 9/11 gatekeeper like Noam Chomsky is bending by admitting the FBI had no evidence against Bin Laden and that the Taliban twice offered to turn him over. If he is bending he has probably done the wet finger which way is the wind blowing test.

[-] 0 points by torusngamble (9) 1 year ago

If it wasn't obvious, I hope you're right....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-dGHwe6COM

[Removed]