Posted 11 months ago on June 28, 2012, 5:12 p.m. EST by bensdad
This content is user submitted and not an official statement
In scalia's dissent today, he referred t o Ginsberg's "dissent" eight times.
As if her "concurrent" decision was a dissent!
Does this mean that it originally WAS written as a dissent -
UNTIL ROBERTS CHANGED HIS VOTE ?
Lets see -
did Obama promise Roberts' wife an ambassadorship ?
a job at $1,000,000 / year ?
was a horse's head put in someone's bed ?
or just another "article 2 / take away your guns" conspiracy ?
fox - boehner - issa - ryan -
come on boys - what can you come up with ?