Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: The Rise of the Regressive Right and the Reawakening of America

Posted 12 years ago on Oct. 16, 2011, 4:58 a.m. EST by jdragonlee (119)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

The Rise of the Regressive Right and the Reawakening of America

Sunday, October 16, 2011

A fundamental war has been waged in this nation since its founding, between progressive forces pushing us forward and regressive forces pulling us backward.

We are going to battle once again.

Progressives believe in openness, equal opportunity, and tolerance. Progressives assume we’re all in it together: We all benefit from public investments in schools and health care and infrastructure. And we all do better with strong safety nets, reasonable constraints on Wall Street and big business, and a truly progressive tax system. Progressives worry when the rich and privileged become powerful enough to undermine democracy.

Regressives take the opposite positions.

Eric Cantor, Paul Ryan, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann and the other tribunes of today’s Republican right aren’t really conservatives. Their goal isn’t to conservative what we have. It’s to take us backwards.

They’d like to return to the 1920s — before Social Security, unemployment insurance, labor laws, the minimum wage, Medicare and Medicaid, worker safety laws, the Environmental Protection Act, the Glass-Steagall Act, the Securities and Exchange Act, and the Voting Rights Act.

In the 1920s Wall Street was unfettered, the rich grew far richer and everyone else went deep into debt, and the nation closed its doors to immigrants.

Rather than conserve the economy, these regressives want to resurrect the classical economics of the 1920s — the view that economic downturns are best addressed by doing nothing until the “rot” is purged out of the system (as Andrew Mellon, Herbert Hoover’s Treasury Secretary, so decorously put it).

In truth, if they had their way we’d be back in the late nineteenth century — before the federal income tax, antitrust laws, the pure food and drug act, and the Federal Reserve. A time when robber barons — railroad, financial, and oil titans — ran the country. A time of wrenching squalor for the many and mind-numbing wealth for the few.

Listen carefully to today’s Republican right and you hear the same Social Darwinism Americans were fed more than a century ago to justify the brazen inequality of the Gilded Age: Survival of the fittest. Don’t help the poor or unemployed or anyone who’s fallen on bad times, they say, because this only encourages laziness. America will be strong only if we reward the rich and punish the needy.

The regressive right has slowly consolidated power over the last three decades as income and wealth have concentrated at the top. In the late 1970s the richest 1 percent of Americans received 9 percent of total income and held 18 percent of the nation’s wealth; by 2007, they had more than 23 percent of total income and 35 percent of America’s wealth. CEOs of the 1970s were paid 40 times the average worker’s wage; now CEOs receive 300 times the typical workers’ wage.

This concentration of income and wealth has generated the political heft to deregulate Wall Street and halve top tax rates. It has bankrolled the so-called Tea Party movement, and captured the House of Representatives and many state governments. Through a sequence of presidential appointments it has also overtaken the Supreme Court.

Scalia, Alito, Thomas, and Roberts (and, all too often, Kennedy) claim they’re conservative jurists. But they’re judicial activists bent on overturning seventy-five years of jurisprudence by resurrecting states’ rights, treating the 2nd Amendment as if America still relied on local militias, narrowing the Commerce Clause, and calling money speech and corporations people.

Yet the great arc of American history reveals an unmistakable pattern. Whenever privilege and power conspire to pull us backward, the nation eventually rallies and moves forward. Sometimes it takes an economic shock like the bursting of a giant speculative bubble; sometimes we just reach a tipping point where the frustrations of average Americans turn into action.

Look at the Progressive reforms between 1900 and 1916; the New Deal of the 1930s; the Civil Rights struggle of the 1950s and 1960s; the widening opportunities for women, minorities, people with disabilities, and gays; and the environmental reforms of the 1970s.

In each of these eras, regressive forces reignited the progressive ideals on which America is built. The result was fundamental reform.

Perhaps this is what’s beginning to happen again across America.

17 Comments

17 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by atki4564 (1259) from Lake Placid, FL 12 years ago

Wow, extremely well said, for many more people will come to your side when you are proactive (for “new” Business & Government solutions), instead of reactive (against “old” Business & Government solutions), which is why what we most immediately need is a comprehensive “new” strategy that implements all our various socioeconomic demands at the same time, regardless of party, and although I'm all in favor of taking down today's ineffective and inefficient Top 10% Management System of Business & Government, there's only one way to do it – by fighting bankers as bankers ourselves; that is, using a Focused Direct Democracy organized according to our current Occupations & Generations. Consequently, I have posted a 1-page Summary of the Strategically Weighted Policies, Organizational Operating Structures, and Tactical Investment Procedures necessary to do this at:

http://getsatisfaction.com/americanselect/topics/on_strategic_legal_policy_organizational_operational_structures_tactical_investment_procedures

Join

http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/StrategicInternationalSystems/

because we need 100,000 “support clicks” at AmericansElect.org to support a Presidential Candidate -- such as any given political opportunist you'd like to draft -- in support of the above bank-focused platform.

Most importantly, remember, as cited in the first link, that as Bank Owner-Voters in your 1 of 48 "new" Business Investment Groups (or "new" Congressional Committees) you become the "new" Congress replacing the "old" Congress according to your current Occupation & Generation, called a Focused Direct Democracy.

Therefore, any Candidate (or Leader) therein, regardless of party, is a straw man, a puppet; it's the STRATEGY – the sequence of steps – that the people organize themselves under, in Military Internet Formation of their Individual Purchasing & Group Investment Power, that's important. In this, sequence is key.

Why? Because there are Natural Social Laws – in mathematical sequence – that are just like Natural Physical Laws, such as the Law of Gravity. You must follow those Natural Social Laws or the result will be Injustice, War, etc.

The FIRST step in Natural Social Law is to CONTROL the Banks as Bank Owner-Voters. If you do not, you will inevitably be UNJUSTLY EXPLOITED by the Top 10% Management Group of Business & Government who have a Legitimate Profit Motive, just like you, to do so.

Consequently, you have no choice but to become Candidates (or Leaders) yourselves as Bank Owner-Voters according to your current Occupation & Generation.

So please JOIN the 2nd link so we can make our support clicks at AmericansElect.org when called for, at exactly the right time, by an e-mail from that group, in support of the above the bank-focused platform. If so, then you will see and feel how your goals can be accomplished within the above strategy as a “new” Candidate (or Leader) of your current Occupation & Generation.

[-] 1 points by jdragonlee (119) 12 years ago

For more articles from Robert Reich, http://robertreich.org/.

[-] 1 points by atki4564 (1259) from Lake Placid, FL 12 years ago

Thanks, I saw it the first time and booked it -- great work.

[-] 1 points by jdragonlee (119) 12 years ago

You are very welcome.

[-] 2 points by OpenSky (217) 12 years ago

good post

[-] 1 points by Markmad (323) 12 years ago

I do love the statement; fighting bankers as bankers ourselves, this simple phrase striked a chord instantly in my head generating a beautiful but simple idea and here it is: Let us all become bankers. How? By simply creating a large public fund in the name of the American people and with these proceedings we do begin to acquire banks and financial institutions, one-by-one. The initial funds can be achieved by many ways, here is one suggestion: every single American citizen is required to contribute with any amount until the size of this fund is larger than Wall Street itself. I know is bizarre, but it is feasible?

[-] 1 points by JustCommonSense (17) 12 years ago

I love this post and the praise for the left. He says....

Progressives believe in openness (like when Polosi and the democrats preached a transparent government only to shut non-partisan CSPAN (it's just a camera put in a room and turned on) out while they made deals behind closed doors on the healthcare law out of the public eye? The whole "But we have to pass the [health care ] bill so that you can find out what is in it.")

Equal opportunity (you know....like racial quotas and reverse discrimination.....the two wrongs make a right philosophy. Sounds soooo equal to me.)

Tolerance (you mean like tolerating the depictions of Bush as Hitler by the left but demonizing the right for depicting Obama as Hitler...... that kind of tolerance?)

I love this.... let's look at some more.

Like the left believes in free speech, until it's speech that offends them and then they want to censor you.

Like when it's not enough for them to simply protest a conservative speaker outside a venue. They will often put plants in the venue to shout out and disrupt the speech with the intention of stopping his free speech because of the left's great legendary capacity for TOLERANCE. How often do you hear the right doing that to liberal speakers?

Free speech... like when conservatives speakers aren't ok to speak at a university campus, but the red carpet is rolled out for liberal ones.

The rule of law..... say they believe in it, then advocate civil disobedience and the breaking of laws. Cuz as long as you think it's for a good cause, breaking laws is perfectly okay.

The left that feels it's okay to reward illegals with amnesty for breaking into our country (against the law) to live here without giving us a say in the matter (for the 3rd time in this country's history) and yet wants to call the police and have me taken away if I was to break into their house (also against the law) and want to live there without giving them a say in the matter.

The left that believes in one man, one vote democracy and the popular vote will of the people...... unless of course the vote doesn't go their way and then they file a lawsuit trying to allow ONE person (a judge) to decide for the MANY that already decided with their vote. You know... that whole EVERY VOTE SHOULD BE COUNTED thing AL Gore kept reminding us about in the 2000 election, only to be disregarded at the left's whim?

Oh.... and the other things they do when the vote and the will of the people don't go their way? Plans for an immediate recall.....like in Wisconsin.

Or like democratic lawmakers leaving a state like spoiled rotten kids in a temper tantrum so they can hold pending state legislation votes hostage until they get their way like they did in Wisconsin, Ohio and in Texas. Republicans don't do that. Could you just imagine the sheer outrage of the left if republicans in democratic majority states used the same childish tactics?

The left that thinks you should have photo id to pick up a drug prescription or show at the airport to TSA screeners for security reasons, but feel it's okay not to have an id when securing one of our most sacred rights from possible fraud.... the right to vote. Well you know the old saying.....Vote early -- and often? It seems to be in their mindset or why else would they oppose such laws?

I've got a million of them folks.... they are like shooting fish in a barrel!

Doctors take a hippocratic oath. Democrats take a hypocritical oath. Pot meet kettle.

[-] 1 points by jdragonlee (119) 12 years ago

It's written by Robert Reich, here is more of his articles: http://robertreich.org/

[-] 1 points by PlasmaStorm (242) 12 years ago

America wasn't built on taxes. There was no income tax in 1786. It wasn't built on opportunities for homosexuals. The Framers thought homosexualism was a travesty.

America was built on freedom of religion. America was built on faith in the Lord Jesus Christ.

Any claim that OWS is "restoring" America is a joke. You don't even understand economics 101. Not even remedial economics.

America wasn't built on anarchy, or people making angry accusations against people they've never met. It wasn't built by people demanding free services.

[-] 1 points by atki4564 (1259) from Lake Placid, FL 12 years ago

You invoke the name of Lord Christ, and yet revoke everything Christ stood for as exemplified in the above statement, for if you only had a brain as RICH as Christ, right?

[-] 1 points by beautifulworld (23772) 12 years ago

No, America was built by slaves.

[-] 1 points by jdragonlee (119) 12 years ago

moron.

[-] 0 points by Solidarity1 (0) from Greenfield, MA 12 years ago

Your freedom of religion here was considered liberal for its time (the Pilgims leaving England to come here), as did the Quakers, Anabaptists, but other non-Christians came here too--like it or not. You say there were no taxes in the 1700's? England most certainly did impose taxes! Here you sound as angry as the protesters. Unfortunately, some religious types think they have so much superiority..remember, the separation of church and state happened long ago, and for enormous reasons. Religion is the #1 cause of wars. Further, history, politics and religion all mixed into discussions, debates, and arguments certainly can lead to violence. Our Creator, long before Jesus, had an evolutionary process. Your points only reflect a reaction about America; Jesus wasn't born in America. Jesus was also a protester, and the poor were included in his following--and he gave things freely; he shared, so to teach otherws to do the same thing. He certainly was not a greedy corporate glutton. America was not built soley on the freedom of religion...freedom of speech..freedom from monarch rule..freedom of enterprise...It is you that is stating the OWS is "restoring"..it is people who want restoration, reform.......

[-] 0 points by jimbosportsfan5 (16) 12 years ago

good thing the progressive reforms are what are driving this country into the ground...(excluding civil rights)

[-] 0 points by Dontbedaft (155) 12 years ago

You have a seriously tainted take on history

[-] 2 points by jdragonlee (119) 12 years ago

Do you know any of those history at all? What's your take? I'd like to hear some concrete ideas.

[-] 0 points by iam99pct (115) 12 years ago

OK but let's be honest - Obama will win again and things will get WORSE THAN THEY ARE NOW. So let's not play up this partisan hackery. Politics won' t fix our current problems. Taking the reins of power non-violently will.