Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr

Forum Post: The Rich and the Rest of Us

Posted 8 years ago on April 21, 2012, 7:54 a.m. EST by flip (7101)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

JUAN GONZALEZ: We turn now to an issue seldom talked about on the presidential campaign trail by President Obama or any of his Republican rivals. The issue is poverty. A recent article in the Chicago Reader described poverty as "the forgotten issue in the presidential campaign." Census data shows nearly one in two Americans, or 150 million people, have fallen into poverty or could be classified as low-income. Thirty-eight percent of African-American children and 35 percent of Latino children live in poverty. In February, Republican presidential front-runner Mitt Romney openly declared he is, quote, "not concerned about the very poor."

AMY GOODMAN: We’re now joined by two guests, Cornel West and Tavis Smiley, who are attempting to start a national dialog on poverty. Last year they took part in a 10-state poverty tour, and they’ve just published a book on the issue called The Rich and the Rest of Us: A Poverty Manifesto.

Cornel West is a professor of religion and African-American studies at Princeton University, author of many books. Tavis Smiley is an award-winning TV and radio broadcaster. He hosts the PBS TV show Tavis Smiley and two radio shows, The Tavis Smiley Show and Smiley & West, which he hosts with Cornel West.

We welcome you both to Democracy Now!

CORNEL WEST: Thank you. A blessing to be here.

TAVIS SMILEY: Delighted to be here. Thank you both for having us.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, you are on a whirlwind tour. The title, Tavis, The Rich and the Rest of Us.

TAVIS SMILEY: That’s what America looks like right about now. There is this gap between the haves and the have-nots, a growing gap, in fact. When 1 percent of the people control 42 percent—own and control 42 percent of the wealth, that’s a problem. When one out of two Americans is either in or near poverty—you take the perennially poor or the persistent poor, on top of them the new poor—we argue in this book the new poor are the former middle class—and the near poor, folk who are a paycheck away, that’s 150 million Americans wrestling with poverty. Mitt Romney, who Juan referenced earlier, wants to call this the "politics of envy." But we think it’s about fundamental fairness, and that’s what we’re trying to talk about in the book.

AMY GOODMAN: I mean, that’s an astounding figure. I just want to stop and not let it go by.

TAVIS SMILEY: I say the same thing.

AMY GOODMAN: One in two Americans?

TAVIS SMILEY: Exactly. One out of two of us, 150 million people, is either in or near poverty. So, you’ve got half of your democracy fighting to get out or to stay out of poverty. And what we argue in this book is that poverty threatens our democracy and that poverty is a matter of national security, that poverty is no longer color-coded. Americans of all races, all colors, all creeds. As you mentioned, Amy, on our poverty tour last summer, 11 states, 18 cities, we saw all kinds of Americans wrestling with this issue. And finally, we saw on this tour poverty that was so extreme, Juan, that it’s clear to us that a slight uptick in our economy, the kind of which we’re experiencing now, a slight uptick, is not going to do much of anything to really alleviate or to address the kind of poverty that we saw. This poverty is not a character flaw anymore. It’s a societal crisis.

JUAN GONZALEZ: But, Cornel West, it was half a century ago that President—another president, Lyndon Johnson, declared a war on poverty. And you, in the book, talk about how that war has progressed, supposedly, or has not progressed.

CORNEL WEST: Well, we know, as a result of the social movements, led by Martin Luther King Jr., but connected Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel and Dorothy Day and Daniel Berrigan and others, that we went from nearly 24 percent of Americans living in poverty to 11 percent—Michael Harrington, Frances Fox Piven, others playing a crucial role. Social movements make a difference. But also, greed at the top has social consequences. This is issues of economic injustice, issues of class inequality, 1 percent of the population having 42 percent of the wealth. 2010, the top 1 percent got 93 percent of the income. And we’re not talking about wealth at this point. Income. Now that’s morally obscene. You have 22 percent of our children of all colors, each one precious, living in poverty. That’s an ethical abomination.



Read the Rules
[-] 4 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 8 years ago

Donated for common cause by Odin:


  • Are You Wondering What This IS All About ?*

We Urge You To Tune In To PBS Frontline’s Documentary

Money, Power, and, Wall Street

Airing on PBS - Tues. Aril 24th and WED. the 25th

Check local listings If You Still Don't Understand, or You Want To See More Of The Malfeasance and Recklessness That Caused So Many Americans To Suffer Needlessly, and a Corrupt System That Continues To Threaten Every American’s Financial Well-Being

Then View These: .

Inside Job – (the best so far) - available at the library

The Warning – also available at the library

Meltdown - available at “top documentary films” web site

There Are Many More Good Sources at The Library and Different Web Sites, But You Will Not Find The Whole Truth in The Corporate-Owned Media. That I Can Guarantee.

Choose The World That Your Kids Will Grow up in

Support Occupy Wall Street* or Don't Complain as


[-] 2 points by flip (7101) 8 years ago

right on!

[-] 1 points by DKAtoday (33802) from Coon Rapids, MN 8 years ago

Hey flip - I could not stop myself from placing that comment advertisement on your excellent post. It is like they were made for each other.

GOOD JOB!!!!!!!!!!

[-] 3 points by beautifulworld (23286) 8 years ago

Evidently the great divide between the rich and the poor has been getting bigger in recent years.

"Labor Department figures released Tuesday show that between the end of the recession in mid-2009 and the first quarter of 2012, earnings of Americans at the top-meaning those who earned more than 90% of all workers-rose 7%, before adjusting for inflation. During the same period, wages of those at the bottom-meaning those who earned less than 90% of all workers-rose 2.5%."


[-] 1 points by GirlFriday (17435) 8 years ago

Link to the rest.

And they rehashed Romney in there which I think is a demonstration of the attitude. Look at the homeless and then look at the programs. He is clearly disconnected from the people.

[-] 1 points by GypsyKing (8708) 8 years ago

Thanks for this timely post. General strike! They need to know we mean business! We need to all be together on this!

[-] -2 points by vvvpr (0) 8 years ago

All except the corporate controlled Democratic and Republican Parties, and their false fronts and operatives like YOU.

[-] 1 points by Nevada1 (5843) 8 years ago

Hi flip, Thank you for post. Welcome to the Third World. Best Regards

[-] 1 points by flip (7101) 8 years ago

we have had the income distribution of a third world country for some time now - we just happen to be much richer than mexico etc - something needs to turn this in a better direction - any ideas?

[-] 1 points by gagablogger (207) 8 years ago

General strike!

[-] 1 points by flip (7101) 8 years ago

i am with you here - iww

[-] 0 points by Misaki (893) 8 years ago

2010, the top 1 percent got 93 percent of the income. And we’re not talking about wealth at this point. Income.

93% of the rise in income. There's a difference. But anyway: If you are poor, it's because you want to be or because you're stupid.

(I like this post which summarizes what the numbers were before and after. Bottom 90%, $29,967 decreased by $127, top 1% was $913,451 and increased by $105,637)

[-] 1 points by flip (7101) 8 years ago

i was wondering what he was talking about - she never questioned that statement - thanks

[+] -4 points by toonces (-117) 8 years ago

The poverty rate has climbed more in the past three years than it has at any other time since The Great Depression. Unemployment has stayed over 8% for longer than any time other than The Great Depression. I doubt the poor can take another Obama presidency. The failure of socialism and progressive policies is there for everyone to see.

[-] 2 points by flip (7101) 8 years ago

fool - what else can one say?

[-] -1 points by toonces (-117) 8 years ago

I agree with you, Obama is a fool.

[-] 1 points by flip (7101) 8 years ago

i knew it - your reading comprehension skills are poor - very poor. how come you handle always reminds me of looney tunes?