Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: The Breaux's Club

Posted 2 years ago on Jan. 6, 2012, 10:25 a.m. EST by FrogWithWings (1367)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

8 Comments

8 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by sinead (474) 2 years ago

Your point?

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 2 years ago

Pay Attention, WHICH ONE she asks and Obama answers. Then ask why hasn't he made an effort to hold a A5CC to restore the original Constitution?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxYDnYgQ5MQ

http://www.serendipity.li/jsmill/us_corporation.htm

http://www.barefootsworld.net/constructive_fraud.html

[-] 1 points by sinead (474) 2 years ago

So you are connecting this President and the living past Presidents with the idea that Obama will not hold a Constitutional Convention to restore the original because they will lose "benefits" of leaving this as they are?

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 2 years ago

Read the 1933 history and learn why congress, the senate and the office of the president is actually owned by the holder of the largest bankruptcy in the history of our planet.

If you can to peek further back to the detailed history of the Federal Reserve's beginning, that may help you put the rest of the pieces together.

I'm telling you our DC government is owned. It is obvious to everyone, regardless if they understand why and refuse to fight simple explanations.

[-] 1 points by sinead (474) 2 years ago

Okay, let's say I agree with that........ what I don't understand is what does that have to do with the past Presidents not have a hard time? Obama's wealth came just before he became President

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 2 years ago

Does it bother you that such a large number of Americans have lost so much and are having a hard time while the suits currently in and even gone from DC don't even break a sweat?

Do you think the Obama's wealth has decreased since going in office?

[-] 1 points by sinead (474) 2 years ago

I suppose it would bother me if I had proof that they had an increase in wealth solely because they were the current President or past Presidents. Are we privy to the income of the past Presidents and how that income was generated? Both Bushes were wealthy before they became President, Clinton did have money issues when he first came out of the Office of the President.... I know absolutely nothing about Carter's income status.

But do you have information that they didn't lose any wealth during the down turn?

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 2 years ago

Yes, it's all public record, DC suits have done very well while citizens have suffered. Proof is plastered all over the net regularly. How this happens is by their treasonous wealth extraction. They are stealing from citizens and it doesn't matter if big corporations hand them the money or they exploit insider trading on wall street.

No citizens, in good faith, have elected anyone with the nod to giving them anything to sell or take from them. However, the reality is DC is owned by the 1933 Force Majeure.... so a bets are off and the Constitution means nothing.