Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: The 1% might not be so opposed to picking up the tab ....

Posted 12 years ago on Nov. 11, 2011, 9:25 a.m. EST by NotYour99 (226)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

The 1% might not be so opposed to picking up the tab for some of what is discussed here daily IF their tax burden wasn't already so great. Slim down the government, reducing spending. Then use that money for the betterment of the people.

But suggestions like some have made with 90% income tax and another 5% of some other tax on top of that are absurd and unrealistic.

30 Comments

30 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by JonoLith (467) 12 years ago

The Tax Rate for the rich, through the fifties and sixties, during America's greatest period of Technological and Infrastructural growth, was 90%.

[-] 1 points by NotYour99 (226) 12 years ago

That's sure not us right now. If you haven't noticed we are in quite the slump, and oppressive taxes won't fix that, it will only make it worse.

[-] 1 points by libertarianincle (312) from Cleveland, OH 12 years ago

I am waiting for the OWSers to come here and talk aobut the 90% income tax. The difference is that the government was smaller and that tax money went to things that DIRECTLY benefited the the 1%, like infrastructure. Now the MAJORITY (and I think on October 31st ALL) of our income tax goes to pay the debt. There is NO benefit. Now it is just theft.

[-] 1 points by JZes (30) 12 years ago

Everyone has to do their part, help the needy, help your neighbors, taxes and money will not solve the problem if there is no one who is willing to help for free.

[-] 1 points by NotYour99 (226) 12 years ago

What you are describing is called charity. Many people do this already. It requires free will of the giver to be considered thus. TAKING from someone to pay fir something so someone else can have it for free is NOT charity. That is unjust and oppression. I'd venture to say that the 1% are already the biggest charitable givers. Tax em some more and watch that dry up.

[-] 1 points by JZes (30) 12 years ago

No that still falls with in the spectrum of money changing hands. This would not be giving money, this would be "boots" on the ground. It applies to everyone.

[-] 1 points by NotYour99 (226) 12 years ago

Yep. That's about right. No comments. OWS is apparently not interested in any kind of compromise to better the people. It seems that only oppression of a minority is what they are after.

[-] 1 points by NotYour99 (226) 12 years ago

I am not a 1%, but I'm trying to get there. What's keeping me from it right now is my tax burden. I've actually given thought to becoming an ex-pat and leaving the country. I doubt I'm the only one. I know in other societies, even those touted here as models to what the US should be, I would be that 1% based on what I can provide them.

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 12 years ago

Sir, you too are not the 1%, their effective tax burden is insignificant while you, and working people kick up to pay the corrput mafia leaders

Like many, you aren't big enough to be "too big to fail" or wealthy enough to have pet laws passed for you, and apparently receive no pet earmarks.

You may never get over that hump, and if the 1% doesn't want you in, you won't.

[-] 2 points by NotYour99 (226) 12 years ago

But, I'm close enough to the 1% that any "sanctions" that would be passed to include them would likely include me. Even if it didn't why would I want to continue to push toward that 1%. There would be no benefit to me to do so, and in America that is WRONG. I have earned and deserve everything I have. To be subjected to progressive taxes instead of something fair and balanced is also wrong. Any victories I have had are my own. Any failures or shortcomings are also my own. None of it is the fault or responsibility of anyone else, 99er or 1er. Own your life.

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 12 years ago

Well I don't see these 1%ers crying about their tax burdens....

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/stocks/these-30-american-corporations-paid-0-of-income-taxes-for-three-years.html/

http://www.sfbg.com/politics/2011/06/03/protesters-target-apple-tax-cheat

Seems to me like, if you were close enough, you'd be getting returns like the big boys!

[-] 1 points by NotYour99 (226) 12 years ago

And that's one of the fundamental misconceptions of this movement. It's not all black and white, 1% or 99%. Lots of people fall in the grey, and they will not side with you.

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 12 years ago

With me? Funny.

[-] 0 points by Perspective (-243) 12 years ago

Well said!

[-] 0 points by hahaha (-41) 12 years ago

And if the looney-tunes suggestions here ever came to pass and the wealthy were taxed at 90%, that is exactly what would happen. They would take their ball and go home. Their new home which would be elsewhere on the planet.

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 12 years ago

NOBODY, and I mean NOBODY cares if the uber-wealthy take their ball and goes home. The overly entitled bloodsuckers are easily replaced with people willing to work and actually produce durable tangible things, unlike paper magic which currently only serves to extract wealth from such production.

And plenty have always been willing to pay the GD taxes on the money. It's only become very fashionable, within the last 20 years, to buy laws that make paper magic so very lucrative.

Investing money is not production or work.

[-] 1 points by NotYour99 (226) 12 years ago

That last statement is so full of ignorance I don't even know where to being. Have you ever borrowed money to pay for something? That was someone making an investment in you. Their reward was interest. Investing is productive. It let's people do things beyond their means, sometimes improving their position my leaps and bounds because of it. Yeesh.

[-] 1 points by NotYour99 (226) 12 years ago

If those wealthy leave there won't be any wealth to distribute except your own. The 99% claim to be so down trodden but if the rich are gone you'll have nothing to spread around. You people would be much better off suggesting compromise than issuing ultimatums.

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 12 years ago

production is from whence wealth originate, printed money means less with each passing day

nobody is suggesting the criminals will not be held accountable and reparations made

[-] 0 points by Perspective (-243) 12 years ago

What you apparently don't understand is when they leave they take their business with them. OWS is nothing more than Obama's class warfare army.

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 12 years ago

Who cares? Let them take their business and sell their paper to the Chinese.

[-] 1 points by NotYour99 (226) 12 years ago

The tax code definitely needs an overhaul to prevent such abuses, but taking these instances and applying them 100% to the 1% is fallacy. The 1% pay 37% or more of our taxes, so most of them are doing their part. You also need to ask yourself, if these businesses didn't get out of paying so much in taxes, then where would that money have cone from? The answer is.... Your pockets.

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 12 years ago

hey, in the words of George Carlin

fuck em

the wealth these crooked bastards extract comes from everyone's pockets but theirs

Your numbers are incorrect

[-] -1 points by Perspective (-243) 12 years ago

Quoting a comedian makes you seem foolish and ignorant. His numbers are correct if you had enough sense to look them up.

[-] 1 points by FrogWithWings (1367) 12 years ago

This is not my concern.

You people seem to not comprehend the game is over. The people have no further use for paper magicians. I suggest you guys learn to do actual work.

[-] 1 points by NotYour99 (226) 12 years ago

Lol. How do you explain to a deluded individual that they are, in fact, deluded. Nothing is over. Nothing significant has even happened yet. And it won't.

[-] 1 points by NotYour99 (226) 12 years ago

No. They aren't. I could even quote them if need be but I would expect intelligent conversation in return and can see I won't be getting that here.

[-] 0 points by Perspective (-243) 12 years ago

?? I said your numbers were right.

[-] 1 points by NotYour99 (226) 12 years ago

Was a misclick sorry. Was supposed to be on the comedian.