Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: TAKE BACK OUR RIGHTS & TURN OVER Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission

Posted 2 years ago on Oct. 11, 2011, 5:28 p.m. EST by HL123 (28)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Hello All, We need to turn over Supreme Court decisions that granted corporations human rights like Freedom of Speech to campaign. It's time to focus on the laws we need to change. We need lawyers and political strength.

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. _ (2010), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment protects corporate and union funding of independent political broadcasts in candidate elections. The 5–4 decision originated in a dispute over whether the non-profit corporation Citizens United could air a film critical of Hillary Clinton, and whether the group could advertise the film in broadcast ads featuring Clinton's image, in apparent violation of the 2002 Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, commonly known as the McCain–Feingold Act, in reference to its primary Senate sponsors.[2]

The decision reached the Supreme Court on appeal from a January 2008 decision by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. The lower court decision had upheld provisions of the 2002 act, which prevented the film Hillary: The Movie from being shown on television within 30 days of 2008 Democratic primaries.[1][3]

The Supreme Court reversed the lower court, striking down those provisions of the McCain–Feingold Act that prohibited all corporations, both for-profit and not-for-profit, and unions from broadcasting “electioneering communications.”[2] An "electioneering communication" was defined in McCain–Feingold as a broadcast, cable, or satellite communication that mentioned a candidate within 60 days of a general election or thirty days of a primary. The decision overruled Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce (1990) and partially overruled McConnell v. Federal Election Commission (2003).[4] McCain–Feingold had previously been weakened, without overruling McConnell, in Federal Election Commission v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. (2007). The Court did uphold requirements for disclaimer and disclosure by sponsors of advertisements. The case did not involve the federal ban on direct contributions from corporations or unions to candidate campaigns or political parties, which remain illegal in races for federal office.[5]

2 Comments

2 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by thegatekeeperbeta (25) from New York, NY 2 years ago

Nice post mate. Is this from a wiki? I can't click the references.

http://www.easymuaythai.com/

[-] 1 points by flanga (26) 1 year ago

I think it was taken from a wiki, not sure though. Have you tried using Google?

Thanks from Clive @ http://easydiablo3.com/.