Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Supporting the "Buffett Tax" makes you look like Democratic Party boot lickers

Posted 12 years ago on Oct. 4, 2011, 2:50 p.m. EST by Kooch (77)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

While the idea of taxing the wealthy more at this time may or may not be good, this is supposed to be a frickin revolution! Revolutionaries don't stand behind their President.

Change the system. Figure out how to pay for it later.

Reform capitalism now.

14 Comments

14 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 2 points by kestrel (274) 12 years ago

Oh.. you mean Obama 2008, instead of Obama 2012?

[-] 1 points by GammaPoint (400) from Oakland, CA 12 years ago

I agree. The Buffett tax is not enough. The rich should be taxed MORE than the middle class is. Let's say Buffet Rule + 20%.

[-] 1 points by skizzy (445) 12 years ago

I agree... If you are for taxing the wealthy more cool. just don't call it the "Buffett Tax" that is just another item for the system to try and co-opt this revolution...

[-] 1 points by garvan (52) from North Bergen, NJ 12 years ago

Only an insane person would agree with Warren Buffett's assessment.

Mr. Buffett exploited the 99% to get where he is. Look at his actions, not his words. That should tell you all you need to know about what a "Buffett" tax would do.

OBSERVE THE ACTIONS! DON'T LISTEN TO THEIR WORDS.

They have lied to us before, they will again.

[-] 1 points by Dutch (6) 12 years ago

But revolutionaries DO support good ideas even if they're not original...

[-] 1 points by revg33k (429) from Woodstock, IL 12 years ago

"Change the system. Figure out how to pay for it later"

Ya because saying that we will figure out how to pay for it later has worked soooooo well so far

[-] 2 points by Kooch (77) 12 years ago

Point taken, but if we really change things properly, all our known conceptions of budgeting government will change as well. I'm for monetary reform. That's a game changer unlike any other. Look up Kucinich's NEED act. That is revolutionary.

[-] 1 points by musearch (26) from Tualatin, OR 12 years ago

http://kucinich.house.gov/UploadedFiles/NEED_ACT.pdf The NEED act does seem a game changer - I can't honestly evaluate what result it would have.

[-] 1 points by Kooch (77) 12 years ago

It has to be better than what we have now. Plus it would end national debt. Imagine getting that BS out of our discourse.

[-] 0 points by SpreadJoy (2) from Queens, NY 12 years ago

Kooch presumes to tell us what we have to believe in to be a "revolutionary" ...Kooch, I think this post makes YOU look like the "boot licker"

[-] 2 points by Kooch (77) 12 years ago

Alrighty then. Keep backing the Prez and calling yourself a "revolutionary".

[-] 1 points by SpreadJoy (2) from Queens, NY 12 years ago

Toppling our government isn't going to lead to utopia, Kooch. It's about restoring our government -- and WE are the government. We let it slip away, but we can reclaim it. It's not about backing or not backing the President. It's about focusing on how we can use democracy so that the President, and all elected officials, will once again reflect the voice of the people.

[-] 1 points by Kooch (77) 12 years ago

Understood, but you're not going to get there by dividing the group with backing a proposal Obama just made at a joint session of Congress. I'm not advocating toppling our government at all. I want to see real changes that are not advocated in the highest levels of power. But seriously, backing the "Buffett Tax" makes this whole thing just seem like Democrats on parade.

[-] 1 points by musearch (26) from Tualatin, OR 12 years ago

For a long time now people have been told: all taxes are bad, all government is bad, all deregulation is good, trust the magic hand of the market. All those things are #$!@. Changing America's viewpoint on these very subjects is important. Maybe, specifically supporting the "Buffet Tax" is silly, but generically: taxing wall street transactions, taxing capital gains,and taxing those at the top - all so that we can properly fund government and the social programs we need, all seems good to me.