Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: suggested list of demands from former Wall Street banker

Posted 12 years ago on Oct. 7, 2011, 2:36 p.m. EST by amonk9 (3)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Occupy Wall Street Suggested Policy Demands

  1. Reinstate the Glass Steagal Act, which in 1933 separated commercial banks (conservative, FDIC insured banks) from investment banks (high-stakes investment and gambling operations). The repeal of this act contributed to the financial crises by giving banks the freedom to take far greater risks with taxpayer insured deposits.

  2. Regulate credit default swaps as insurance, which they are. Warren Buffet called CDSs “financial weapons of mass destruction” because they multiply the effect of a major default ten, twenty, a hundred times and tie all financial markets together. CDSs are hugely profitable bets for banks and hedge funds. Regulating them will require that the institutions writing them have sufficient assets to cover their bets. Banks and hedge funds will not like this.

  3. Tax hedge fund fees as ordinary income, which they are. The hedge fund managers have a special benefit (called carried interest), which reduces their taxes by over 50% totaling billions of dollars per year. There is no reason that these mega-billionaires, who create no real value or jobs, should get special benefits at our expense.

  4. Reduce interest on student loans to 1% or less, forgive some percentage of student loans as an economic stimulus. The banks charge 7% and more for taxpayer guaranteed student loans where the banks have little or no risk. Student loans are just another way the banks suck money out of the economy and away from real people.

  5. Enact universal, single payer health care creating a government financed, privately managed health care system. This is the fiscally conservative thing to do. We pay almost twice as much per capita for health care as other wealthy countries pay. The extra money goes to health insurance companies, drug companies, medical tech companies and lawyers. Our health care system is one half medical care and one half corporate welfare. We need to end all forms of corporate welfare, most of which are invisible to the average person.

  6. End US imperialism, which is simply more corporate welfare that simultaneously feeds the fires of terrorism. Yes, our young men and women are getting blown up and killed for oil; that is, to benefit corporations, oil corporations and other corporations. We need to bring our troops home and put them to work on rebuilding our infrastructure instead of creating hatred in the world.

  7. End or reduce globalization through tariffs and other import controls. Globalization is mostly corporate welfare at taxpayer expense. It’s true, we each save $100 per year in cheaper pants and shoes, but the corporations make trillions and pay billions in bonuses from profits made by moving jobs and manufacturing facilities overseas and out of reach of environmental and child labor laws. Reducing globalization will be good for our economy and the environment.

  8. Create a tax policy that reduces income and wealth stratification. The United States is now worse than many third world countries in terms of concentration of wealth and income. This is one of the major causes of our deficit as the very rich shield their assets or buy their way out of paying taxes while the poor can’t afford to pay more and the great tax-paying middle class shrinks toward oblivion through the effects of globalization. Some suggestions. Remove the cap on social security taxes (currently on $105,000 income) and with one pen stroke, solve the social security problem forever. Also, pay for universal health care with a flat payroll and income tax on all income including dividends and capital gains and in this way pay for universal health care almost painlessly while reducing the concentration of wealth.

  9. Stop bank bailouts. The Fed is once again bailing out US banks, this time by buying European sovereign debt (really!) with US taxpayer money. They are doing this to protect the US banks and hedge funds that wrote CDSs on sovereign debt and on European banks’ bonds. This is another covert bailout of our high risk-taking banks with taxpayer money. The crisis that is unfolding in Europe has little to do with bailing out the people of Greece or Portugal or Spain. The European bailout money doesn’t even slow down as it passes by Greece on the way to French and German (and US) banks.

  10. Throw the cash-rich influence peddlers out of the halls of government so that legislators can legislate honestly and for the good of the people. This is the most important policy demand. Vote out any politician who signed a no-tax pledge. Limit and tightly monitor campaign contributions. Make laws that clearly state that corporations are not people and do not have the rights people have.

36 Comments

36 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 1 points by whereschrism (1) 12 years ago

...and how about #11:

Audit the Federal Reserve and expose the greatest swindle in the history of the world wherein foreign bankers -- wealthy beyond anyone's wildest imagination -- have illegally rigged the financial system of the U.S. government so that it is in perpetually escalating debt for the privilege of access to its own currency.

[-] 1 points by ss341 (2) 12 years ago

Also: We need to incentivize fair salaries via regulation or tax breaks. Those at the top of the corporate ladder should be prohibited from earning more than 20x the amount earned by folks at the bottom of the ladder.

[-] 1 points by ss341 (2) 12 years ago

We need a uniform code of corporate law in the USA! Currently, corporations are organized and controlled by state law with the vast majority of them--over 60% of the Fortune 500, e.g.--organized in Delaware. The reason is that DE law is the most favorable for directors and shareholders seeking to avoid personal liability for corporate actions. States are ill-prepared to regulate major corporations like Walmart, which, if it were a state, would be larger than 20 other states on a sales v GDP comparison. We need a new uniform corporate code to reign them in...

[-] 1 points by TNT331 (5) 12 years ago

Add one important demand: nationalize Fed. When Fed is first created, it printed money based on how much gold they had, and people could exchange their dollars back to gold whenever they wanted. However, after the gold standard ended, it doesn't make any sense to have a private entity prints money out of nothing and lend the money to the government and people for interests. That is just ridiculous!

[-] 1 points by occupysolutions (2) 12 years ago

A printable front and back ditto of info relative to the Economic Crisis

http://occupysolutions.wordpress.com/printable-ditto/

More detailed information to help protesters in understanding parts of their cause can be found at www.occupysolutions.com

[-] 1 points by molten (12) 12 years ago

Copy and paste this post repeatedly. Here, there, and everywhere.

[-] 1 points by littleg (452) 12 years ago

Thank you! Thank you! I agree to each and every sentence and the explanation is crystal clear.

[-] 1 points by writtenbyrex (30) from Michigan City, IN 12 years ago

Democratic Capitalism is a political, economic and social ideology based on the synergies that exist between democratic free-market economy, worker owned industry and a liberal cultural system. The economic system that will stem from such an ideology will support a capitalist free market economy that is regulated by a democratic political system supported by the national majority. This system combines the free-market energies of competition with the enormous productivity and innovation released in an environment of good-will and cooperation. The most obvious way that Democratic Capitalism stands apart from authoritarian capitalism is through the limiting of special interest influences such as corporate political lobbyists. The United States at one point in history was on the road to Democratic Capitalism as its political-economic system until the shift to authoritarian capitalism occurred several decades ago.

[-] 1 points by gracie (16) 12 years ago

which brings us back to campaign finance reform - we have to get the dirty business money out of politics and public service!

[-] 1 points by writtenbyrex (30) from Michigan City, IN 12 years ago

Yes, however in order to do that we must implement a worker owned system. Simply outlawing lobbyists and the ability for companies to donate money to political parties will create other problems that perpetuate the dictatorial business structure we currently deal with.

[-] 1 points by distortion (196) 12 years ago

i think once we remove the influence of the powerful from our government the majority of these will happen anyways. Once our political leaders rely solely on doing whats best for the country and it's people to get re-elected, a good majority of these types of things will happen.

[-] 1 points by writtenbyrex (30) from Michigan City, IN 12 years ago

Who is the author of these demands?

[-] 1 points by writtenbyrex (30) from Michigan City, IN 12 years ago

Please visit the below. We need to demand our legislators create policy to promote a democratic economy, and phase our our current model of dictatorial capitalism. We must use freedom and democracy in our economy!

http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/708507790/protest-to-prosperity-occupy-wall-street-pamphlet

[-] 1 points by shoestruggle (1) 12 years ago

What do you think about the credit card companies?

[-] 1 points by littleg (452) 12 years ago

They are like bad Santa Claus who give you 1 gift and take 2 gifts back.

[-] 1 points by Timeless (2) 12 years ago

If I may add to the last item, what we need is publicly financed campaigns. Once the lobbyists are out of the halls of Congress, we might actually have a government that represents "the rest of us"

[-] 1 points by Timeless (2) 12 years ago

If I may add to the last item, what we need is publicly financed campaigns. Once the lobbyists are out of the halls of Congress, we might actually have a government that represents "the rest of us"

[-] 1 points by camanachd (2) 12 years ago

alwayzbull: You have concerns about health care funded at a federal level. After the 2nd world war, when the UK was in a worse financial position than it is now, the people voted for a socialist government. Socialism doesn't mean you have to wear blue overalls and all drive the same type of car. It can mean many things and is adaptable to a whole host of conditions and countries. It means, in this example, that the government, elected by ordinary citizens, in empowered by those people, to carry out certain functions and provide universal services on their behalf. In the UK, we have had governments of many political hues: since 1979 they have all been to the right (even the so-called "left wing" ones, under Blair and Brown). Throughout that whole period, we have had the same deregulation of the financial system and its attendant chaos. The National Health Service, a system of universal state-provided health care has remained, free, at the point of need, because it is sacred to British people. Citizens pay a fee each month to central (federal) government. The government runs the health service, on behalf of the citizens, just like Canada and the vast majority of European countries. By the people, for the people.To give an example of the Europe-wide nature of health provision, being a European Union citizen, when living in Denmark a few years ago, I fell ill. I went to the local hospital, with my EU health card. Because I pay national insurance here, in Scotland, I got to see a doctor in the superb Danish (state/federal) system for free, at the point of need. I pay my state insurance here, it works Europe-wide. All that is needed in the States is a change of attitude and the will to implement it. On a more personal level, it is more than gratifying to see the people of the United States of America finally demanding a return to the principles enshrined in the Declaration which promised so much. These principles were about the needs of individuals, yes, but it should be remembered that all individuals make up the community, collectively. No man is an island.The Declaration was about community. Individuals within any community have, I believe, inalienable rights and collective responsibilties. All citizens have a collective responsibility to contribute to a system which promotes the wellbeing of all.Treat your fellow man as you would wish to be treated yourself. Health is a right ofall humans, the citizen and the body that represents the desires of all citizens, federal government, should provide for the good of all.

[-] 1 points by littleg (452) 12 years ago

Unfortunately the Libertarians and a majority of conservatives treat any service from government as Free lunch and so they want do support it. I guess they have some sort of social deficiency!

[-] 1 points by ForTheWinnebago (143) 12 years ago

This is great! Good work.

I would also add:

  1. US based corporations that have income earned abroad ought to be taxed at the top US corporate income rate (no tax holidays).

  2. All regulatory bodies must be financed through Congressional appropriations. For example, the OCC is one of the organizations that regulates banks, yet its funding does not come from Congress, it comes from the banks themselves; the banks are funding an organization that regulates them. This creates huge conflicts of interest.

  3. End prison privatization, by having prisons privatized and maximizing shareholder value, it goes adamantly against the values of a healthy society. We have the most prisoners per capita of any nation on Earth and do not need to exacerbate the process.

  4. Overturn FEC v Citizens United (piggybacks on your #10, but at a more granular level)

  5. Have banking capital requirements scale upwards with market capitalization. As the banks get larger in size, since they pose a larger systemic risk, they ought to have to mitigate that risk by having higher capital requirements and/or tier 1 capital ratios.

  6. Adjust all income brackets for inflation and then add on what we had in in 1964, 2 additional tax brackets of 500,000 and 1,000,0000. Subsequently, lower the tax burden for all other tax brackets.

[-] 1 points by silentxzero (8) from Avondale, AZ 12 years ago

I am all for this list.

[-] 1 points by ahnubiss (2) 12 years ago

I love this list. In addition to this list, can we also take down the patriot act as number 11? I feel like the patriot act gives some superior powers to the executive branch under emergency circumstances, which can segway into taking away our civil rights permanently.

[-] 1 points by gracie (16) 12 years ago

Awesome list! But I think we need to move number 10 to number 1 - if we don't disempower lobbyists and rich donators, none of this will ever get passed or implemented. And, along those lines, I think we need to get rid of the oh-so-outdated electoral college. How can we call ourselves a democracy when half of the citizens' votes are thrown away every time? A vote = a vote!

[-] 1 points by AlanO (52) 12 years ago

Take down the stated list the organizers posted on this site, which FOX News is now using to portray protesters as an incoherent and disorganized mob, and replace it with this.

I couldn't agree with this more. These ten simple demands are certainly realistic AND achievable in the near term. I'd like to see the average FOX blogger argue against ANY of it.

[-] 1 points by WhyIsTheCouchAlwaysWet (316) from Lexington, KY 12 years ago

Seconded! Well said!

[-] 1 points by rmmo (262) 12 years ago

I would add: stop the cozy relationships between industry and Washington. There is almost no real regulation going on there. Not only were they not regulating the banks and wall street, but the rest of corporate America too. Take Johnson & Johnson as an example. The pillar of American industry was selling contaminated Tylenol, Motrin, Benadryl and many other medications for years. The consumer complaints and faulty drugs got so bad, that Johnson & Johnson in 2008 secretly hired independent contractors to go re-buy their products off of the shelves. The government caught wind of this and took years to do anything about. Finally, in 2010 there was a Congressional hearing and it was determined that the America J&J plants were so dirty and the products we all trust were so faulty, that J&J entered into a "consent decree" for the government to take over their plants and shut them down.

Can't get Motrin anymore and many more J&J medications? This is why. Why didn't you hear more about this? The government and industry both colluded because they both dropped the ball. Where was the FDA? Why didn't they regulate J&J and make sure the drugs were manufactured safely to federal standards? Because the government now serves the corporate and not people's interests.

The government is supposed to protect the public from industry and not lie in bed with them. You would have thought this would happen in China, but it was J&J plants in the US. We are not being protected because our government is bought and sold by the wealthy and big business.

And the billionaire propaganda media wants us all to think that we need to further deregulate to get ourselves out of this mess.

[-] 1 points by rmmo (262) 12 years ago

Well said!

[-] 1 points by SocialJustice (7) 12 years ago

Hopefully, if we can continue to stand together we can see these goals realized

[-] 1 points by alwayzabull (228) 12 years ago

I agree with everything you've written here, but I'm not convinced of #5. A service such as health care funded at the federal level is bound to fail. Can you explain how this would work?

[-] 1 points by gracie (16) 12 years ago

camanachd (see comment above) made some great points, but I would just add that most of those socialist, government-fun health care systems cost less per capita than our fight-for-yourself system. The main reason being that they take a preventative approach and provide all necessary care to keep people healthy. Our system, on the other hand, values expensive procedures and drugs to solve already-advanced problems and forces many to go uninsured. In turn, these uninsured wait until their issues are urgent and then go to the Emergency room so their care is paid for by the rest of us who are already paying for over-priced insurance.

[-] 1 points by littleg (452) 12 years ago

I would say the current healthcare system in US does everything possible to ensure doctors, hospitals, insurance companies, pharma companies all make a ton of money while passing on physical/mental pain and debt to patients while bankrupting the medicare system (basically adding to govt debt).

[-] 1 points by marsdefIAnCe (365) 12 years ago

Nice framework

[-] 1 points by tehwicki (13) 12 years ago

10.: Corporations in the USA used to be government funded projects that were disbanded after the project was finished. It was not until Anti-slavery laws came about that people were able to argue corporations into the state they are in today. These men twisted anti-slavery laws. Sick. Now, these men are not alive today. But the people who are OK with what they did should be held accountable. I totally 100% agree with your list.

[-] 1 points by SIBob (154) from Staten Island, NY 12 years ago

I couldn't have said it better. You hit the nail squarely on the head.