Welcome login | signup
Language en es fr
OccupyForum

Forum Post: Spending Myth 1:

Posted 2 years ago on July 19, 2012, 6:39 a.m. EST by flip (6401)
This content is user submitted and not an official statement

Spending Myth 1: Today’s deficits have taken us to a historically unprecedented, economically catastrophic place.

This myth has had the effect of binding the hands of elected officials and policymakers at every level of government. It has also emboldened those who claim that we must cut government spending as quickly, as radically, as deeply as possible.

In fact, we’ve been here before. In 2009, the federal budget deficit was a whopping 10.1% of the American economy and back in 1943, in the midst of World War II, it was three times that -- 30.3%. This fiscal year the deficit will total around 7.6%. Yes, that is big. But in the Congressional Budget Office’s grimmest projections, that figure will fall to 6.3% next year, and 5.8% in fiscal 2014. In 1983, under President Reagan, the deficit hit 6% of the economy, and by 1998, that had turned into a surplus. So, while projected deficits remain large, they’re neither historically unprecedented, nor insurmountable.

More important still, the size of the deficit is no sign that lawmakers should make immediate deep cuts in spending. In fact, history tells us that such reductions are guaranteed to harm, if not cripple, an economy still teetering at the edge of recession.

A number of leading economists are now busy explaining why the deficit this year actually ought to be a lot larger, not smaller; why there should be more government spending, including aid to state and local governments, which would create new jobs and prevent layoffs in areas like education and law enforcement. Such efforts, working in tandem with slow but positive job growth in the private sector, might indeed mean genuine recovery. Government budget cuts, on the other hand, offset private-sector gains with the huge and depressing effect of public-sector layoffs, and have damaging ripple effects on the rest of the economy as well.

When the economy is healthier, a host of promising options are at hand for lawmakers who want to narrow the gap between spending and tax revenue. For example, loopholes and deductions in the tax code that hand enormous subsidies to wealthy Americans and corporations will cost the Treasury around $1.3 trillion in lost revenue this year alone -- more, that is, than the entire budget deficit. Closing some of them would make great strides toward significant deficit reductions.

Alarmingly, the deficit-reduction fever that’s resulted from this first spending myth has led many Americans to throw their support behind de-investment in domestic priorities like education, research, and infrastructure -- cuts that threaten to undo generations of progress.

7 Comments

7 Comments


Read the Rules
[-] 0 points by geo (2638) from Concord, NC 2 years ago

Alarmingly, the deficit-reduction fever that’s resulted from this first spending myth has led many Americans to throw their support behind de-investment in domestic priorities like education, research, and infrastructure -- cuts that threaten to undo generations of progress.

Because of unwarranted fear, ignorance of how our monetary system is designed to operate, and control by those controlling governmental purse strings.

[-] 0 points by know1 (210) 2 years ago

exactly !!! What we need is is ww111 spending on green tech. Solar rails ,solar cars, solar houses

[-] 1 points by flip (6401) 2 years ago

right on - so obvious but hard to get the political system to address it - if you read buckminster fuller's book "spaceship earth" from 1969 he was saying the same thing!

[-] 0 points by know1 (210) 2 years ago

OWS dosn't seem to have any demands ??? Should that be it ???

Of coarse, only one of many, But thats a good one

who could desagree, other than the austerity people, but fuck them ,they're wrong and they know it, thats a cynical movment

[-] 0 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 2 years ago

Are you demanding it ??

[-] 0 points by know1 (210) 2 years ago

Yes I am , JadedCitizen

[-] 1 points by JadedCitizen (4277) 2 years ago

You might try raising the issue on the official web site,....., http://www.nycga.net/